Cargando…

3113 Formative Evaluation of a Safety Baby Shower Intervention for Rural African American Parents and Community Advisors

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: To explore rural African American parents’ and their community advisors’ perspectives on the Safety Baby Shower’s acceptability, feasibility, and adaptability. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Collaborating with a local community organization, we explored community advisors’ and e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nabaweesi, Rosemary, Aitken, Mary, Mullins, Samantha H., Bryant-Moore, Keneshia, Curran, Geoffrey M., Harris, Zenobia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799198/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.206
_version_ 1783460232086683648
author Nabaweesi, Rosemary
Aitken, Mary
Mullins, Samantha H.
Bryant-Moore, Keneshia
Curran, Geoffrey M.
Harris, Zenobia
author_facet Nabaweesi, Rosemary
Aitken, Mary
Mullins, Samantha H.
Bryant-Moore, Keneshia
Curran, Geoffrey M.
Harris, Zenobia
author_sort Nabaweesi, Rosemary
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: To explore rural African American parents’ and their community advisors’ perspectives on the Safety Baby Shower’s acceptability, feasibility, and adaptability. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Collaborating with a local community organization, we explored community advisors’ and expectant women’s SBS experiences to understand intervention delivery and adoption in a rural underserved community (RUC). The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided our data collection and analysis using focus groups and key informant interviews. We used directed content analysis to generate themes and sub codes. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Five focus groups (21 participants) and one key informant interview were conducted. Identified barriers that hinder feasibility and acceptability included resources, time/ flexibility, intervention location, cultural norms and beliefs, and the lack of a birthing hospital in the county. “Baby proofing”, “reinforcement products” and “teaching sleep safety on the same day as infant clinical appointment” are expectant mothers’ exemplars for what comes to their minds when asked to think about safety baby showers. To improve feasibility, both community advisors and expectant mothers suggested adaptations ranging from decentralizing or rotating intervention location, using different delivery sites such as churches, scheduling intervention outside business hours, to incorporating intervention into school health fairs and barbeque events. Social media emerged as a facilitator, and integrating safe sleep education into personal baby showers emerged as an implementation strategy. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: The community advisors and expectant mothers identified a wide spectrum of potential adaptations that have potential to improve safe sleep knowledge and practices. In the next study phase, identified themes will inform intervention adaptation and suggested implementation strategies will support uptake of the adapted SBS. Identifying transformative implementation strategies and conducting a community-informed SBS adaptation using a collective decision-making process between intervention experts and local community partners will support improved safety baby shower delivery, adoption and sustainability in RUCs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6799198
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67991982019-10-28 3113 Formative Evaluation of a Safety Baby Shower Intervention for Rural African American Parents and Community Advisors Nabaweesi, Rosemary Aitken, Mary Mullins, Samantha H. Bryant-Moore, Keneshia Curran, Geoffrey M. Harris, Zenobia J Clin Transl Sci Health Equity & Community Engagement OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: To explore rural African American parents’ and their community advisors’ perspectives on the Safety Baby Shower’s acceptability, feasibility, and adaptability. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Collaborating with a local community organization, we explored community advisors’ and expectant women’s SBS experiences to understand intervention delivery and adoption in a rural underserved community (RUC). The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided our data collection and analysis using focus groups and key informant interviews. We used directed content analysis to generate themes and sub codes. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Five focus groups (21 participants) and one key informant interview were conducted. Identified barriers that hinder feasibility and acceptability included resources, time/ flexibility, intervention location, cultural norms and beliefs, and the lack of a birthing hospital in the county. “Baby proofing”, “reinforcement products” and “teaching sleep safety on the same day as infant clinical appointment” are expectant mothers’ exemplars for what comes to their minds when asked to think about safety baby showers. To improve feasibility, both community advisors and expectant mothers suggested adaptations ranging from decentralizing or rotating intervention location, using different delivery sites such as churches, scheduling intervention outside business hours, to incorporating intervention into school health fairs and barbeque events. Social media emerged as a facilitator, and integrating safe sleep education into personal baby showers emerged as an implementation strategy. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: The community advisors and expectant mothers identified a wide spectrum of potential adaptations that have potential to improve safe sleep knowledge and practices. In the next study phase, identified themes will inform intervention adaptation and suggested implementation strategies will support uptake of the adapted SBS. Identifying transformative implementation strategies and conducting a community-informed SBS adaptation using a collective decision-making process between intervention experts and local community partners will support improved safety baby shower delivery, adoption and sustainability in RUCs. Cambridge University Press 2019-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6799198/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.206 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ncnd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
spellingShingle Health Equity & Community Engagement
Nabaweesi, Rosemary
Aitken, Mary
Mullins, Samantha H.
Bryant-Moore, Keneshia
Curran, Geoffrey M.
Harris, Zenobia
3113 Formative Evaluation of a Safety Baby Shower Intervention for Rural African American Parents and Community Advisors
title 3113 Formative Evaluation of a Safety Baby Shower Intervention for Rural African American Parents and Community Advisors
title_full 3113 Formative Evaluation of a Safety Baby Shower Intervention for Rural African American Parents and Community Advisors
title_fullStr 3113 Formative Evaluation of a Safety Baby Shower Intervention for Rural African American Parents and Community Advisors
title_full_unstemmed 3113 Formative Evaluation of a Safety Baby Shower Intervention for Rural African American Parents and Community Advisors
title_short 3113 Formative Evaluation of a Safety Baby Shower Intervention for Rural African American Parents and Community Advisors
title_sort 3113 formative evaluation of a safety baby shower intervention for rural african american parents and community advisors
topic Health Equity & Community Engagement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799198/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.206
work_keys_str_mv AT nabaweesirosemary 3113formativeevaluationofasafetybabyshowerinterventionforruralafricanamericanparentsandcommunityadvisors
AT aitkenmary 3113formativeevaluationofasafetybabyshowerinterventionforruralafricanamericanparentsandcommunityadvisors
AT mullinssamanthah 3113formativeevaluationofasafetybabyshowerinterventionforruralafricanamericanparentsandcommunityadvisors
AT bryantmoorekeneshia 3113formativeevaluationofasafetybabyshowerinterventionforruralafricanamericanparentsandcommunityadvisors
AT currangeoffreym 3113formativeevaluationofasafetybabyshowerinterventionforruralafricanamericanparentsandcommunityadvisors
AT harriszenobia 3113formativeevaluationofasafetybabyshowerinterventionforruralafricanamericanparentsandcommunityadvisors