Cargando…
2526: Using the multiphase optimization strategy to engineer an optimized STI preventive intervention among college students
OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The goal of this study is to develop an effective and efficient STI preventive intervention among college students following the principles and phases of MOST. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION As part of the preparation phase, an explicit conceptual model, drawing heavily on theory...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799310/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2017.289 |
_version_ | 1783460256440909824 |
---|---|
author | Christine Kugler, Kari Tanner, Amanda E. Wyrick, David L. Milroy, Jeffrey J. Chambers, Brittany D. Ma, Alice Collins, Linda M. |
author_facet | Christine Kugler, Kari Tanner, Amanda E. Wyrick, David L. Milroy, Jeffrey J. Chambers, Brittany D. Ma, Alice Collins, Linda M. |
author_sort | Christine Kugler, Kari |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The goal of this study is to develop an effective and efficient STI preventive intervention among college students following the principles and phases of MOST. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION As part of the preparation phase, an explicit conceptual model, drawing heavily on theory and prior research, was used to translate the existing science into 5 candidate intervention components (ie, descriptive norms, injunctive norms, expectancies, perceived benefits of protective behavioral strategies, and self-efficacy). For the optimization phase, in Fall 2016 all first-year students (n=3547) from 4 universities were recruited to participate. Students were randomized to 1 of 32 different experimental conditions that included a combination of the candidate intervention components. Component effectiveness was evaluated using data from an immediate post-intervention survey on respective component mediators (eg, alcohol and sex-related descriptive norms). After a second factorial experiment (Fall 2017), only those intervention components that meet the pre-specified criteria of day ≥0.15 will be included in the optimized intervention. The evaluation phase will evaluate the effectiveness of the optimized STI preventive intervention via a randomized-control trial (Fall 2018). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Preliminary results from the first factorial experiment suggest that descriptive norms and injunctive norms intervention components were significantly effective in reducing post-intervention perceived alcohol prevalence (β=−0.28, p<0.001) and approval of alcohol (β=−0.33, p<0.001), and sex-related norms (β=−0.23, p<.001). These results, in combination with process data, are being used to inform revisions of the intervention components to be included in a second factorial screening experiment. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: This study demonstrates how an iterative approach to engineering an STI preventive intervention using MOST can affect the behaviors of college students and serve as a foundation for other translational science. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6799310 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67993102019-10-28 2526: Using the multiphase optimization strategy to engineer an optimized STI preventive intervention among college students Christine Kugler, Kari Tanner, Amanda E. Wyrick, David L. Milroy, Jeffrey J. Chambers, Brittany D. Ma, Alice Collins, Linda M. J Clin Transl Sci Outcomes Research/Health Services Research/Comparative Effectiveness OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The goal of this study is to develop an effective and efficient STI preventive intervention among college students following the principles and phases of MOST. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION As part of the preparation phase, an explicit conceptual model, drawing heavily on theory and prior research, was used to translate the existing science into 5 candidate intervention components (ie, descriptive norms, injunctive norms, expectancies, perceived benefits of protective behavioral strategies, and self-efficacy). For the optimization phase, in Fall 2016 all first-year students (n=3547) from 4 universities were recruited to participate. Students were randomized to 1 of 32 different experimental conditions that included a combination of the candidate intervention components. Component effectiveness was evaluated using data from an immediate post-intervention survey on respective component mediators (eg, alcohol and sex-related descriptive norms). After a second factorial experiment (Fall 2017), only those intervention components that meet the pre-specified criteria of day ≥0.15 will be included in the optimized intervention. The evaluation phase will evaluate the effectiveness of the optimized STI preventive intervention via a randomized-control trial (Fall 2018). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Preliminary results from the first factorial experiment suggest that descriptive norms and injunctive norms intervention components were significantly effective in reducing post-intervention perceived alcohol prevalence (β=−0.28, p<0.001) and approval of alcohol (β=−0.33, p<0.001), and sex-related norms (β=−0.23, p<.001). These results, in combination with process data, are being used to inform revisions of the intervention components to be included in a second factorial screening experiment. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: This study demonstrates how an iterative approach to engineering an STI preventive intervention using MOST can affect the behaviors of college students and serve as a foundation for other translational science. Cambridge University Press 2018-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6799310/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2017.289 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Outcomes Research/Health Services Research/Comparative Effectiveness Christine Kugler, Kari Tanner, Amanda E. Wyrick, David L. Milroy, Jeffrey J. Chambers, Brittany D. Ma, Alice Collins, Linda M. 2526: Using the multiphase optimization strategy to engineer an optimized STI preventive intervention among college students |
title | 2526: Using the multiphase optimization strategy to engineer an optimized STI preventive intervention among college students |
title_full | 2526: Using the multiphase optimization strategy to engineer an optimized STI preventive intervention among college students |
title_fullStr | 2526: Using the multiphase optimization strategy to engineer an optimized STI preventive intervention among college students |
title_full_unstemmed | 2526: Using the multiphase optimization strategy to engineer an optimized STI preventive intervention among college students |
title_short | 2526: Using the multiphase optimization strategy to engineer an optimized STI preventive intervention among college students |
title_sort | 2526: using the multiphase optimization strategy to engineer an optimized sti preventive intervention among college students |
topic | Outcomes Research/Health Services Research/Comparative Effectiveness |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799310/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2017.289 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT christinekuglerkari 2526usingthemultiphaseoptimizationstrategytoengineeranoptimizedstipreventiveinterventionamongcollegestudents AT tanneramandae 2526usingthemultiphaseoptimizationstrategytoengineeranoptimizedstipreventiveinterventionamongcollegestudents AT wyrickdavidl 2526usingthemultiphaseoptimizationstrategytoengineeranoptimizedstipreventiveinterventionamongcollegestudents AT milroyjeffreyj 2526usingthemultiphaseoptimizationstrategytoengineeranoptimizedstipreventiveinterventionamongcollegestudents AT chambersbrittanyd 2526usingthemultiphaseoptimizationstrategytoengineeranoptimizedstipreventiveinterventionamongcollegestudents AT maalice 2526usingthemultiphaseoptimizationstrategytoengineeranoptimizedstipreventiveinterventionamongcollegestudents AT collinslindam 2526usingthemultiphaseoptimizationstrategytoengineeranoptimizedstipreventiveinterventionamongcollegestudents |