Cargando…

2526: Using the multiphase optimization strategy to engineer an optimized STI preventive intervention among college students

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The goal of this study is to develop an effective and efficient STI preventive intervention among college students following the principles and phases of MOST. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION As part of the preparation phase, an explicit conceptual model, drawing heavily on theory...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christine Kugler, Kari, Tanner, Amanda E., Wyrick, David L., Milroy, Jeffrey J., Chambers, Brittany D., Ma, Alice, Collins, Linda M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799310/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2017.289
_version_ 1783460256440909824
author Christine Kugler, Kari
Tanner, Amanda E.
Wyrick, David L.
Milroy, Jeffrey J.
Chambers, Brittany D.
Ma, Alice
Collins, Linda M.
author_facet Christine Kugler, Kari
Tanner, Amanda E.
Wyrick, David L.
Milroy, Jeffrey J.
Chambers, Brittany D.
Ma, Alice
Collins, Linda M.
author_sort Christine Kugler, Kari
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The goal of this study is to develop an effective and efficient STI preventive intervention among college students following the principles and phases of MOST. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION As part of the preparation phase, an explicit conceptual model, drawing heavily on theory and prior research, was used to translate the existing science into 5 candidate intervention components (ie, descriptive norms, injunctive norms, expectancies, perceived benefits of protective behavioral strategies, and self-efficacy). For the optimization phase, in Fall 2016 all first-year students (n=3547) from 4 universities were recruited to participate. Students were randomized to 1 of 32 different experimental conditions that included a combination of the candidate intervention components. Component effectiveness was evaluated using data from an immediate post-intervention survey on respective component mediators (eg, alcohol and sex-related descriptive norms). After a second factorial experiment (Fall 2017), only those intervention components that meet the pre-specified criteria of day ≥0.15 will be included in the optimized intervention. The evaluation phase will evaluate the effectiveness of the optimized STI preventive intervention via a randomized-control trial (Fall 2018). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Preliminary results from the first factorial experiment suggest that descriptive norms and injunctive norms intervention components were significantly effective in reducing post-intervention perceived alcohol prevalence (β=−0.28, p<0.001) and approval of alcohol (β=−0.33, p<0.001), and sex-related norms (β=−0.23, p<.001). These results, in combination with process data, are being used to inform revisions of the intervention components to be included in a second factorial screening experiment. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: This study demonstrates how an iterative approach to engineering an STI preventive intervention using MOST can affect the behaviors of college students and serve as a foundation for other translational science.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6799310
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67993102019-10-28 2526: Using the multiphase optimization strategy to engineer an optimized STI preventive intervention among college students Christine Kugler, Kari Tanner, Amanda E. Wyrick, David L. Milroy, Jeffrey J. Chambers, Brittany D. Ma, Alice Collins, Linda M. J Clin Transl Sci Outcomes Research/Health Services Research/Comparative Effectiveness OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The goal of this study is to develop an effective and efficient STI preventive intervention among college students following the principles and phases of MOST. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION As part of the preparation phase, an explicit conceptual model, drawing heavily on theory and prior research, was used to translate the existing science into 5 candidate intervention components (ie, descriptive norms, injunctive norms, expectancies, perceived benefits of protective behavioral strategies, and self-efficacy). For the optimization phase, in Fall 2016 all first-year students (n=3547) from 4 universities were recruited to participate. Students were randomized to 1 of 32 different experimental conditions that included a combination of the candidate intervention components. Component effectiveness was evaluated using data from an immediate post-intervention survey on respective component mediators (eg, alcohol and sex-related descriptive norms). After a second factorial experiment (Fall 2017), only those intervention components that meet the pre-specified criteria of day ≥0.15 will be included in the optimized intervention. The evaluation phase will evaluate the effectiveness of the optimized STI preventive intervention via a randomized-control trial (Fall 2018). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Preliminary results from the first factorial experiment suggest that descriptive norms and injunctive norms intervention components were significantly effective in reducing post-intervention perceived alcohol prevalence (β=−0.28, p<0.001) and approval of alcohol (β=−0.33, p<0.001), and sex-related norms (β=−0.23, p<.001). These results, in combination with process data, are being used to inform revisions of the intervention components to be included in a second factorial screening experiment. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: This study demonstrates how an iterative approach to engineering an STI preventive intervention using MOST can affect the behaviors of college students and serve as a foundation for other translational science. Cambridge University Press 2018-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6799310/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2017.289 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Outcomes Research/Health Services Research/Comparative Effectiveness
Christine Kugler, Kari
Tanner, Amanda E.
Wyrick, David L.
Milroy, Jeffrey J.
Chambers, Brittany D.
Ma, Alice
Collins, Linda M.
2526: Using the multiphase optimization strategy to engineer an optimized STI preventive intervention among college students
title 2526: Using the multiphase optimization strategy to engineer an optimized STI preventive intervention among college students
title_full 2526: Using the multiphase optimization strategy to engineer an optimized STI preventive intervention among college students
title_fullStr 2526: Using the multiphase optimization strategy to engineer an optimized STI preventive intervention among college students
title_full_unstemmed 2526: Using the multiphase optimization strategy to engineer an optimized STI preventive intervention among college students
title_short 2526: Using the multiphase optimization strategy to engineer an optimized STI preventive intervention among college students
title_sort 2526: using the multiphase optimization strategy to engineer an optimized sti preventive intervention among college students
topic Outcomes Research/Health Services Research/Comparative Effectiveness
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799310/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2017.289
work_keys_str_mv AT christinekuglerkari 2526usingthemultiphaseoptimizationstrategytoengineeranoptimizedstipreventiveinterventionamongcollegestudents
AT tanneramandae 2526usingthemultiphaseoptimizationstrategytoengineeranoptimizedstipreventiveinterventionamongcollegestudents
AT wyrickdavidl 2526usingthemultiphaseoptimizationstrategytoengineeranoptimizedstipreventiveinterventionamongcollegestudents
AT milroyjeffreyj 2526usingthemultiphaseoptimizationstrategytoengineeranoptimizedstipreventiveinterventionamongcollegestudents
AT chambersbrittanyd 2526usingthemultiphaseoptimizationstrategytoengineeranoptimizedstipreventiveinterventionamongcollegestudents
AT maalice 2526usingthemultiphaseoptimizationstrategytoengineeranoptimizedstipreventiveinterventionamongcollegestudents
AT collinslindam 2526usingthemultiphaseoptimizationstrategytoengineeranoptimizedstipreventiveinterventionamongcollegestudents