Cargando…

2199 Critical and creative thinking course: Fundamental for a junior researcher

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Explain the difference between creative and critical thinking. Practice and enhance the critical thinking skills. Display innovative thinking through creative solutions and insights. Critically evaluate evidence in research. Think imaginatively, actively seeking out new poi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Laurido, Lourdes E. Soto, Norman, Marie K., Rubio, Doris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799479/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.200
_version_ 1783460294018727936
author de Laurido, Lourdes E. Soto
Norman, Marie K.
Rubio, Doris
author_facet de Laurido, Lourdes E. Soto
Norman, Marie K.
Rubio, Doris
author_sort de Laurido, Lourdes E. Soto
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Explain the difference between creative and critical thinking. Practice and enhance the critical thinking skills. Display innovative thinking through creative solutions and insights. Critically evaluate evidence in research. Think imaginatively, actively seeking out new points of view. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Offer an online course in Critical and Creative Thinking to junior researchers to improve their capacity to think and transforms their ideas in research questions and aims that bring new option to the field of clinical and translational research. Evaluate their improvement through evaluation forms and exercises that show their process to think imaginatively. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The Scholars will understood the importance of critical and creative thinking in their careers, believed they could apply the insights and knowledge from the course in their grant and paper writing, recognized that they don’t always consider if they are being critical or creative in their thinking and actions. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: The course helped the participants to improve their capacity to think and saw a need to develop a more systematic thought processes in their life and work. The junior research will understand the difference between opinion, reasoned, judgment and fact and they will be able to judge the credibility of an information source using criteria such as authorship, currency and potential bias that can improve their grant submission and scientific writing skills.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6799479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67994792019-10-28 2199 Critical and creative thinking course: Fundamental for a junior researcher de Laurido, Lourdes E. Soto Norman, Marie K. Rubio, Doris J Clin Transl Sci Basic/Translational Science/Team Science OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Explain the difference between creative and critical thinking. Practice and enhance the critical thinking skills. Display innovative thinking through creative solutions and insights. Critically evaluate evidence in research. Think imaginatively, actively seeking out new points of view. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Offer an online course in Critical and Creative Thinking to junior researchers to improve their capacity to think and transforms their ideas in research questions and aims that bring new option to the field of clinical and translational research. Evaluate their improvement through evaluation forms and exercises that show their process to think imaginatively. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The Scholars will understood the importance of critical and creative thinking in their careers, believed they could apply the insights and knowledge from the course in their grant and paper writing, recognized that they don’t always consider if they are being critical or creative in their thinking and actions. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: The course helped the participants to improve their capacity to think and saw a need to develop a more systematic thought processes in their life and work. The junior research will understand the difference between opinion, reasoned, judgment and fact and they will be able to judge the credibility of an information source using criteria such as authorship, currency and potential bias that can improve their grant submission and scientific writing skills. Cambridge University Press 2018-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6799479/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.200 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Basic/Translational Science/Team Science
de Laurido, Lourdes E. Soto
Norman, Marie K.
Rubio, Doris
2199 Critical and creative thinking course: Fundamental for a junior researcher
title 2199 Critical and creative thinking course: Fundamental for a junior researcher
title_full 2199 Critical and creative thinking course: Fundamental for a junior researcher
title_fullStr 2199 Critical and creative thinking course: Fundamental for a junior researcher
title_full_unstemmed 2199 Critical and creative thinking course: Fundamental for a junior researcher
title_short 2199 Critical and creative thinking course: Fundamental for a junior researcher
title_sort 2199 critical and creative thinking course: fundamental for a junior researcher
topic Basic/Translational Science/Team Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799479/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.200
work_keys_str_mv AT delauridolourdesesoto 2199criticalandcreativethinkingcoursefundamentalforajuniorresearcher
AT normanmariek 2199criticalandcreativethinkingcoursefundamentalforajuniorresearcher
AT rubiodoris 2199criticalandcreativethinkingcoursefundamentalforajuniorresearcher