Cargando…

2521 Use of forced air warming devices to induce fever-range hyperthermia in critically ill septic patients

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Afebrile septic patients are twice as likely to die and develop nosocomial infections as compared with those with fever; the reason for these differences is unknown. One hypothesis is that elevated temperatures directly boost immunity and inhibit microorganism growth. Howev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drewry, Anne M., Ablordeppey, Enyo A., Kollef, Marin H., Hotchkiss, Richard S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799641/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.191
_version_ 1783460330943283200
author Drewry, Anne M.
Ablordeppey, Enyo A.
Kollef, Marin H.
Hotchkiss, Richard S.
author_facet Drewry, Anne M.
Ablordeppey, Enyo A.
Kollef, Marin H.
Hotchkiss, Richard S.
author_sort Drewry, Anne M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Afebrile septic patients are twice as likely to die and develop nosocomial infections as compared with those with fever; the reason for these differences is unknown. One hypothesis is that elevated temperatures directly boost immunity and inhibit microorganism growth. However, there is little data examining the clinical effects of warming septic patients. The goal of this study was to determine whether warming afebrile septic patients to fever-range hyperthermia with noninvasive forced air warmers is feasible and safe. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This is an ongoing randomized trial on afebrile mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis. The intervention consisted of 48 hours of external warming with a forced air warming device to a goal core temperature of 1.5°C higher than the lowest recorded temperature within the 24 hours preceding enrollment. Efficacy of the intervention and adverse event data (i.e., increases in heart rate and vasopressor doses) were collected. Clinical outcomes included 28-day mortality and acquisition of secondary infections. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: In total, 18 patients were randomized to the control and warming groups, respectively. Baseline characteristics (including demographics, comorbidities, and illness severity scores) were similar among the 2 groups, except the control group had more males (61% vs. 28%, p=0.04). Median (IQR) body temperature averaged over the 48-hour intervention period was higher in the warming group [38.2 (37.6, 38.6) vs. 37.1 (36.4, 37.4) °C, p<0.001). Patients in the warming group achieved core temperatures above their goal for a median of 37 (IQR 11, 45) hours during the 48-hour intervention period. There were no differences in heart rate or vasopressor dose changes or acquisition of secondary infections between the groups. Eight (44.4%) control patients and 3 (16.7%) warmed patients died by day 28 (p=0.07). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Externally warming severe septic patients with forced air warming devices effectively raises core body temperature and is safe. Additional research will focus on cellular and immunological changes seen in warmed Versus control patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6799641
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67996412019-10-28 2521 Use of forced air warming devices to induce fever-range hyperthermia in critically ill septic patients Drewry, Anne M. Ablordeppey, Enyo A. Kollef, Marin H. Hotchkiss, Richard S. J Clin Transl Sci Basic/Translational Science/Team Science OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Afebrile septic patients are twice as likely to die and develop nosocomial infections as compared with those with fever; the reason for these differences is unknown. One hypothesis is that elevated temperatures directly boost immunity and inhibit microorganism growth. However, there is little data examining the clinical effects of warming septic patients. The goal of this study was to determine whether warming afebrile septic patients to fever-range hyperthermia with noninvasive forced air warmers is feasible and safe. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This is an ongoing randomized trial on afebrile mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis. The intervention consisted of 48 hours of external warming with a forced air warming device to a goal core temperature of 1.5°C higher than the lowest recorded temperature within the 24 hours preceding enrollment. Efficacy of the intervention and adverse event data (i.e., increases in heart rate and vasopressor doses) were collected. Clinical outcomes included 28-day mortality and acquisition of secondary infections. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: In total, 18 patients were randomized to the control and warming groups, respectively. Baseline characteristics (including demographics, comorbidities, and illness severity scores) were similar among the 2 groups, except the control group had more males (61% vs. 28%, p=0.04). Median (IQR) body temperature averaged over the 48-hour intervention period was higher in the warming group [38.2 (37.6, 38.6) vs. 37.1 (36.4, 37.4) °C, p<0.001). Patients in the warming group achieved core temperatures above their goal for a median of 37 (IQR 11, 45) hours during the 48-hour intervention period. There were no differences in heart rate or vasopressor dose changes or acquisition of secondary infections between the groups. Eight (44.4%) control patients and 3 (16.7%) warmed patients died by day 28 (p=0.07). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Externally warming severe septic patients with forced air warming devices effectively raises core body temperature and is safe. Additional research will focus on cellular and immunological changes seen in warmed Versus control patients. Cambridge University Press 2018-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6799641/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.191 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Basic/Translational Science/Team Science
Drewry, Anne M.
Ablordeppey, Enyo A.
Kollef, Marin H.
Hotchkiss, Richard S.
2521 Use of forced air warming devices to induce fever-range hyperthermia in critically ill septic patients
title 2521 Use of forced air warming devices to induce fever-range hyperthermia in critically ill septic patients
title_full 2521 Use of forced air warming devices to induce fever-range hyperthermia in critically ill septic patients
title_fullStr 2521 Use of forced air warming devices to induce fever-range hyperthermia in critically ill septic patients
title_full_unstemmed 2521 Use of forced air warming devices to induce fever-range hyperthermia in critically ill septic patients
title_short 2521 Use of forced air warming devices to induce fever-range hyperthermia in critically ill septic patients
title_sort 2521 use of forced air warming devices to induce fever-range hyperthermia in critically ill septic patients
topic Basic/Translational Science/Team Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799641/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.191
work_keys_str_mv AT drewryannem 2521useofforcedairwarmingdevicestoinducefeverrangehyperthermiaincriticallyillsepticpatients
AT ablordeppeyenyoa 2521useofforcedairwarmingdevicestoinducefeverrangehyperthermiaincriticallyillsepticpatients
AT kollefmarinh 2521useofforcedairwarmingdevicestoinducefeverrangehyperthermiaincriticallyillsepticpatients
AT hotchkissrichards 2521useofforcedairwarmingdevicestoinducefeverrangehyperthermiaincriticallyillsepticpatients