Cargando…

2136 Frequently overlooked challenges of pragmatic trials

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: To review the multiple differences between traditional research design and on the ground pragmatic trials. To review two pragmatic projects, identify core assumptions and to contrast assumptions with the reality of conducting T3 and T4 research. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Ob...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kessler, Rodger S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799654/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.213
_version_ 1783460334443429888
author Kessler, Rodger S.
author_facet Kessler, Rodger S.
author_sort Kessler, Rodger S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: To review the multiple differences between traditional research design and on the ground pragmatic trials. To review two pragmatic projects, identify core assumptions and to contrast assumptions with the reality of conducting T3 and T4 research. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Observational mixed methods multi trial review of large multi site implementations. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The complexities of implementation on the ground were consistently greater than anticipated and required changing assumptions and research design elements. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Research findings are tremendously influenced by design and design implementation decisions. Anticipating the scope and breadth of the challenges will assist potential of successful implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6799654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67996542019-10-28 2136 Frequently overlooked challenges of pragmatic trials Kessler, Rodger S. J Clin Transl Sci Basic/Translational Science/Team Science OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: To review the multiple differences between traditional research design and on the ground pragmatic trials. To review two pragmatic projects, identify core assumptions and to contrast assumptions with the reality of conducting T3 and T4 research. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Observational mixed methods multi trial review of large multi site implementations. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The complexities of implementation on the ground were consistently greater than anticipated and required changing assumptions and research design elements. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Research findings are tremendously influenced by design and design implementation decisions. Anticipating the scope and breadth of the challenges will assist potential of successful implementation. Cambridge University Press 2018-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6799654/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.213 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Basic/Translational Science/Team Science
Kessler, Rodger S.
2136 Frequently overlooked challenges of pragmatic trials
title 2136 Frequently overlooked challenges of pragmatic trials
title_full 2136 Frequently overlooked challenges of pragmatic trials
title_fullStr 2136 Frequently overlooked challenges of pragmatic trials
title_full_unstemmed 2136 Frequently overlooked challenges of pragmatic trials
title_short 2136 Frequently overlooked challenges of pragmatic trials
title_sort 2136 frequently overlooked challenges of pragmatic trials
topic Basic/Translational Science/Team Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799654/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.213
work_keys_str_mv AT kesslerrodgers 2136frequentlyoverlookedchallengesofpragmatictrials