Cargando…

3412 Informed Consent: Refining the Process

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: -This study aims to evaluate our retention rate into our prospective clinical trial. We will be comparing the rate of withdrawal both before and after our revamped informed consent process. -We aim to assess patient satisfaction with our study and u METHODS/STUDY POPULATION...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perry, Courtney, Barrett, Terrence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799793/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.280
_version_ 1783460366218428416
author Perry, Courtney
Barrett, Terrence
author_facet Perry, Courtney
Barrett, Terrence
author_sort Perry, Courtney
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: -This study aims to evaluate our retention rate into our prospective clinical trial. We will be comparing the rate of withdrawal both before and after our revamped informed consent process. -We aim to assess patient satisfaction with our study and u METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: -The informed consent process for an observational prospective study at our institution has been modified to lengthen the recruitment and consenting process. -In brief, the research protocol for this observational prospective aims to evaluate the role of steroids on ulcer healing in patients with ulcerative colitis. This study involves an initial standard of care colonoscopy with biopsies and photos. The areas biopsied are marked with a tattoo. The patients are started on steroids for management of their Ulcerative Colitis, and must return for two research colonoscopies at one week post- initial diagnostic visit, and at one month. Additional study biopsies are obtained at the one week visit and photo documentation is obtained. At the one month visit, only photos are obtained to document healing. -In addition to patients with active ulcerative colitis, this study recruits control groups of patients with UC in remission, as well as two groups of normal control patients (one group on steroids for non-IBD reasons, and one group not on steroids. -Prior to our informed consent intervention, patients were screened for eligibility on the day of their standard of care endoscopy. The study was explained to the patient prior to their endoscopy, often in the “pre-op” endoscopy suite. -Our intervention seeks to draw out the consent and recruitment process. All patients scheduled for upcoming endoscopies will be mailed a generic flyer announcing research studies occurring in the endoscopy suite. Patients will be pre-screened at least a week prior to endoscopy with the aid of the endoscopy scheduler. Patients interested in hearing about research will be contacted via phone by study personnel, and a copy of the consent as well as a brief summary will be mailed to the patient. -Patients potentially interested in study participation will be asked to arrive 30 minutes earlier than they typically would for their procedure, and they will be consented in a quiet and private consultation room. They will be given ample time to ask clarifying questions regarding the study. -At the conclusion of their participation, patients will receive an anonymous post-participation survey that seeks to assess their feelings regarding the study and their understanding of the research process. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: This study adds to the ongoing body of evidence suggesting that the informed consent process is more than the three key elements initially described by the Belmont Report 40 years ago. Several factors can impact patient’s willingness to participate in research, and the amount of time it takes for patients to achieve all three elements of consent can vary from person to person. The traditional method of consent just prior to study entrance is one that needs to be revisited, and we propose that prolonging the consenting process will positively impact not only patients, but also the overall research process by ensuring that those who decide to participate remain adherent to study protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6799793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67997932019-10-28 3412 Informed Consent: Refining the Process Perry, Courtney Barrett, Terrence J Clin Transl Sci Science and Health Policy/Ethics/Health Impacts/Outcomes Research OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: -This study aims to evaluate our retention rate into our prospective clinical trial. We will be comparing the rate of withdrawal both before and after our revamped informed consent process. -We aim to assess patient satisfaction with our study and u METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: -The informed consent process for an observational prospective study at our institution has been modified to lengthen the recruitment and consenting process. -In brief, the research protocol for this observational prospective aims to evaluate the role of steroids on ulcer healing in patients with ulcerative colitis. This study involves an initial standard of care colonoscopy with biopsies and photos. The areas biopsied are marked with a tattoo. The patients are started on steroids for management of their Ulcerative Colitis, and must return for two research colonoscopies at one week post- initial diagnostic visit, and at one month. Additional study biopsies are obtained at the one week visit and photo documentation is obtained. At the one month visit, only photos are obtained to document healing. -In addition to patients with active ulcerative colitis, this study recruits control groups of patients with UC in remission, as well as two groups of normal control patients (one group on steroids for non-IBD reasons, and one group not on steroids. -Prior to our informed consent intervention, patients were screened for eligibility on the day of their standard of care endoscopy. The study was explained to the patient prior to their endoscopy, often in the “pre-op” endoscopy suite. -Our intervention seeks to draw out the consent and recruitment process. All patients scheduled for upcoming endoscopies will be mailed a generic flyer announcing research studies occurring in the endoscopy suite. Patients will be pre-screened at least a week prior to endoscopy with the aid of the endoscopy scheduler. Patients interested in hearing about research will be contacted via phone by study personnel, and a copy of the consent as well as a brief summary will be mailed to the patient. -Patients potentially interested in study participation will be asked to arrive 30 minutes earlier than they typically would for their procedure, and they will be consented in a quiet and private consultation room. They will be given ample time to ask clarifying questions regarding the study. -At the conclusion of their participation, patients will receive an anonymous post-participation survey that seeks to assess their feelings regarding the study and their understanding of the research process. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: This study adds to the ongoing body of evidence suggesting that the informed consent process is more than the three key elements initially described by the Belmont Report 40 years ago. Several factors can impact patient’s willingness to participate in research, and the amount of time it takes for patients to achieve all three elements of consent can vary from person to person. The traditional method of consent just prior to study entrance is one that needs to be revisited, and we propose that prolonging the consenting process will positively impact not only patients, but also the overall research process by ensuring that those who decide to participate remain adherent to study protocols. Cambridge University Press 2019-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6799793/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.280 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ncnd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
spellingShingle Science and Health Policy/Ethics/Health Impacts/Outcomes Research
Perry, Courtney
Barrett, Terrence
3412 Informed Consent: Refining the Process
title 3412 Informed Consent: Refining the Process
title_full 3412 Informed Consent: Refining the Process
title_fullStr 3412 Informed Consent: Refining the Process
title_full_unstemmed 3412 Informed Consent: Refining the Process
title_short 3412 Informed Consent: Refining the Process
title_sort 3412 informed consent: refining the process
topic Science and Health Policy/Ethics/Health Impacts/Outcomes Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799793/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.280
work_keys_str_mv AT perrycourtney 3412informedconsentrefiningtheprocess
AT barrettterrence 3412informedconsentrefiningtheprocess