Cargando…
3185 A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Nonabsorbable Antibiotic Rifaximin vs. Dietary Intervention Low in Fermentable Sugars (FODMAP) in Irritable Bowel Syndrome
OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Objectives and goals of this study are to (i) determine whether IBS-D patients randomized to either rifaximin or low FODMAP diet show improvement in IBS-related symptoms; and (2) identify using longitudinal analyses how SIBO status and fecal microbiota features associate wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799797/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.75 |
_version_ | 1783460367244984320 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Allen Rao, Krishna Haller, Emily Dam, Lauren Van Baker, Jason Eswaran, Shanti Chey, William Young, Vincent Owyang, Chung Hasler, William |
author_facet | Lee, Allen Rao, Krishna Haller, Emily Dam, Lauren Van Baker, Jason Eswaran, Shanti Chey, William Young, Vincent Owyang, Chung Hasler, William |
author_sort | Lee, Allen |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Objectives and goals of this study are to (i) determine whether IBS-D patients randomized to either rifaximin or low FODMAP diet show improvement in IBS-related symptoms; and (2) identify using longitudinal analyses how SIBO status and fecal microbiota features associate with response to either rifaximin or low FODMAP dietary intervention. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: 42 patients ≥ 18 years of age who meet Rome IV criteria for IBS-D will be randomized to receive either rifaximin or low FODMAP diet intervention. The primary outcome will be the proportion of responders to intervention which is defined as ≥ 30% reduction in mean daily abdominal pain or bloating by visual analog scale compared with baseline. Exclusion criteria will include: (a) history of microscopic colitis, inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, or other organic disease that could explain symptoms, (b) prior gastrointestinal surgery, other than appendectomy or cholecystectomy > 6 months prior to study initiation, (c) prior use of rifaximin or formal dietary interventions for IBS-D, (d) use of antibiotics within the past 3 months, or (e) use of probiotics within 1 month of study entry. Glucose hydrogen breath tests will be performed at the beginning and end of the trial to evaluate for SIBO. Fecal samples will be collected at 0, 2, and 6 weeks to determine changes in fecal microbial composition and structure. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: This study seeks to examine whether longitudinal analyses of small intestinal and colonic microbiota can subtype IBS-D subjects into clinically relevant phenotypes. A total of 18 subjects have been enrolled into the study. Clinical variables, hydrogen breath test results, and fecal microbiota data are being collected for ongoing analysis. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Results from this study may help move treatment of IBS from a purely symptom based approach to a more individualized approach by stratifying IBS-D patients into distinct clinical phenotypes which are amenable to targeted therapeutic approaches. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6799797 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67997972019-10-28 3185 A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Nonabsorbable Antibiotic Rifaximin vs. Dietary Intervention Low in Fermentable Sugars (FODMAP) in Irritable Bowel Syndrome Lee, Allen Rao, Krishna Haller, Emily Dam, Lauren Van Baker, Jason Eswaran, Shanti Chey, William Young, Vincent Owyang, Chung Hasler, William J Clin Transl Sci Clinical Epidemiology/Clinical Trial OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Objectives and goals of this study are to (i) determine whether IBS-D patients randomized to either rifaximin or low FODMAP diet show improvement in IBS-related symptoms; and (2) identify using longitudinal analyses how SIBO status and fecal microbiota features associate with response to either rifaximin or low FODMAP dietary intervention. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: 42 patients ≥ 18 years of age who meet Rome IV criteria for IBS-D will be randomized to receive either rifaximin or low FODMAP diet intervention. The primary outcome will be the proportion of responders to intervention which is defined as ≥ 30% reduction in mean daily abdominal pain or bloating by visual analog scale compared with baseline. Exclusion criteria will include: (a) history of microscopic colitis, inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, or other organic disease that could explain symptoms, (b) prior gastrointestinal surgery, other than appendectomy or cholecystectomy > 6 months prior to study initiation, (c) prior use of rifaximin or formal dietary interventions for IBS-D, (d) use of antibiotics within the past 3 months, or (e) use of probiotics within 1 month of study entry. Glucose hydrogen breath tests will be performed at the beginning and end of the trial to evaluate for SIBO. Fecal samples will be collected at 0, 2, and 6 weeks to determine changes in fecal microbial composition and structure. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: This study seeks to examine whether longitudinal analyses of small intestinal and colonic microbiota can subtype IBS-D subjects into clinically relevant phenotypes. A total of 18 subjects have been enrolled into the study. Clinical variables, hydrogen breath test results, and fecal microbiota data are being collected for ongoing analysis. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Results from this study may help move treatment of IBS from a purely symptom based approach to a more individualized approach by stratifying IBS-D patients into distinct clinical phenotypes which are amenable to targeted therapeutic approaches. Cambridge University Press 2019-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6799797/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.75 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ncnd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Epidemiology/Clinical Trial Lee, Allen Rao, Krishna Haller, Emily Dam, Lauren Van Baker, Jason Eswaran, Shanti Chey, William Young, Vincent Owyang, Chung Hasler, William 3185 A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Nonabsorbable Antibiotic Rifaximin vs. Dietary Intervention Low in Fermentable Sugars (FODMAP) in Irritable Bowel Syndrome |
title | 3185 A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Nonabsorbable Antibiotic Rifaximin vs. Dietary Intervention Low in Fermentable Sugars (FODMAP) in Irritable Bowel Syndrome |
title_full | 3185 A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Nonabsorbable Antibiotic Rifaximin vs. Dietary Intervention Low in Fermentable Sugars (FODMAP) in Irritable Bowel Syndrome |
title_fullStr | 3185 A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Nonabsorbable Antibiotic Rifaximin vs. Dietary Intervention Low in Fermentable Sugars (FODMAP) in Irritable Bowel Syndrome |
title_full_unstemmed | 3185 A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Nonabsorbable Antibiotic Rifaximin vs. Dietary Intervention Low in Fermentable Sugars (FODMAP) in Irritable Bowel Syndrome |
title_short | 3185 A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Nonabsorbable Antibiotic Rifaximin vs. Dietary Intervention Low in Fermentable Sugars (FODMAP) in Irritable Bowel Syndrome |
title_sort | 3185 a randomized controlled trial comparing the nonabsorbable antibiotic rifaximin vs. dietary intervention low in fermentable sugars (fodmap) in irritable bowel syndrome |
topic | Clinical Epidemiology/Clinical Trial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799797/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.75 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leeallen 3185arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingthenonabsorbableantibioticrifaximinvsdietaryinterventionlowinfermentablesugarsfodmapinirritablebowelsyndrome AT raokrishna 3185arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingthenonabsorbableantibioticrifaximinvsdietaryinterventionlowinfermentablesugarsfodmapinirritablebowelsyndrome AT halleremily 3185arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingthenonabsorbableantibioticrifaximinvsdietaryinterventionlowinfermentablesugarsfodmapinirritablebowelsyndrome AT damlaurenvan 3185arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingthenonabsorbableantibioticrifaximinvsdietaryinterventionlowinfermentablesugarsfodmapinirritablebowelsyndrome AT bakerjason 3185arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingthenonabsorbableantibioticrifaximinvsdietaryinterventionlowinfermentablesugarsfodmapinirritablebowelsyndrome AT eswaranshanti 3185arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingthenonabsorbableantibioticrifaximinvsdietaryinterventionlowinfermentablesugarsfodmapinirritablebowelsyndrome AT cheywilliam 3185arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingthenonabsorbableantibioticrifaximinvsdietaryinterventionlowinfermentablesugarsfodmapinirritablebowelsyndrome AT youngvincent 3185arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingthenonabsorbableantibioticrifaximinvsdietaryinterventionlowinfermentablesugarsfodmapinirritablebowelsyndrome AT owyangchung 3185arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingthenonabsorbableantibioticrifaximinvsdietaryinterventionlowinfermentablesugarsfodmapinirritablebowelsyndrome AT haslerwilliam 3185arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingthenonabsorbableantibioticrifaximinvsdietaryinterventionlowinfermentablesugarsfodmapinirritablebowelsyndrome |