Cargando…

3185 A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Nonabsorbable Antibiotic Rifaximin vs. Dietary Intervention Low in Fermentable Sugars (FODMAP) in Irritable Bowel Syndrome

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Objectives and goals of this study are to (i) determine whether IBS-D patients randomized to either rifaximin or low FODMAP diet show improvement in IBS-related symptoms; and (2) identify using longitudinal analyses how SIBO status and fecal microbiota features associate wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Allen, Rao, Krishna, Haller, Emily, Dam, Lauren Van, Baker, Jason, Eswaran, Shanti, Chey, William, Young, Vincent, Owyang, Chung, Hasler, William
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799797/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.75
_version_ 1783460367244984320
author Lee, Allen
Rao, Krishna
Haller, Emily
Dam, Lauren Van
Baker, Jason
Eswaran, Shanti
Chey, William
Young, Vincent
Owyang, Chung
Hasler, William
author_facet Lee, Allen
Rao, Krishna
Haller, Emily
Dam, Lauren Van
Baker, Jason
Eswaran, Shanti
Chey, William
Young, Vincent
Owyang, Chung
Hasler, William
author_sort Lee, Allen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Objectives and goals of this study are to (i) determine whether IBS-D patients randomized to either rifaximin or low FODMAP diet show improvement in IBS-related symptoms; and (2) identify using longitudinal analyses how SIBO status and fecal microbiota features associate with response to either rifaximin or low FODMAP dietary intervention. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: 42 patients ≥ 18 years of age who meet Rome IV criteria for IBS-D will be randomized to receive either rifaximin or low FODMAP diet intervention. The primary outcome will be the proportion of responders to intervention which is defined as ≥ 30% reduction in mean daily abdominal pain or bloating by visual analog scale compared with baseline. Exclusion criteria will include: (a) history of microscopic colitis, inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, or other organic disease that could explain symptoms, (b) prior gastrointestinal surgery, other than appendectomy or cholecystectomy > 6 months prior to study initiation, (c) prior use of rifaximin or formal dietary interventions for IBS-D, (d) use of antibiotics within the past 3 months, or (e) use of probiotics within 1 month of study entry. Glucose hydrogen breath tests will be performed at the beginning and end of the trial to evaluate for SIBO. Fecal samples will be collected at 0, 2, and 6 weeks to determine changes in fecal microbial composition and structure. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: This study seeks to examine whether longitudinal analyses of small intestinal and colonic microbiota can subtype IBS-D subjects into clinically relevant phenotypes. A total of 18 subjects have been enrolled into the study. Clinical variables, hydrogen breath test results, and fecal microbiota data are being collected for ongoing analysis. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Results from this study may help move treatment of IBS from a purely symptom based approach to a more individualized approach by stratifying IBS-D patients into distinct clinical phenotypes which are amenable to targeted therapeutic approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6799797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67997972019-10-28 3185 A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Nonabsorbable Antibiotic Rifaximin vs. Dietary Intervention Low in Fermentable Sugars (FODMAP) in Irritable Bowel Syndrome Lee, Allen Rao, Krishna Haller, Emily Dam, Lauren Van Baker, Jason Eswaran, Shanti Chey, William Young, Vincent Owyang, Chung Hasler, William J Clin Transl Sci Clinical Epidemiology/Clinical Trial OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Objectives and goals of this study are to (i) determine whether IBS-D patients randomized to either rifaximin or low FODMAP diet show improvement in IBS-related symptoms; and (2) identify using longitudinal analyses how SIBO status and fecal microbiota features associate with response to either rifaximin or low FODMAP dietary intervention. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: 42 patients ≥ 18 years of age who meet Rome IV criteria for IBS-D will be randomized to receive either rifaximin or low FODMAP diet intervention. The primary outcome will be the proportion of responders to intervention which is defined as ≥ 30% reduction in mean daily abdominal pain or bloating by visual analog scale compared with baseline. Exclusion criteria will include: (a) history of microscopic colitis, inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, or other organic disease that could explain symptoms, (b) prior gastrointestinal surgery, other than appendectomy or cholecystectomy > 6 months prior to study initiation, (c) prior use of rifaximin or formal dietary interventions for IBS-D, (d) use of antibiotics within the past 3 months, or (e) use of probiotics within 1 month of study entry. Glucose hydrogen breath tests will be performed at the beginning and end of the trial to evaluate for SIBO. Fecal samples will be collected at 0, 2, and 6 weeks to determine changes in fecal microbial composition and structure. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: This study seeks to examine whether longitudinal analyses of small intestinal and colonic microbiota can subtype IBS-D subjects into clinically relevant phenotypes. A total of 18 subjects have been enrolled into the study. Clinical variables, hydrogen breath test results, and fecal microbiota data are being collected for ongoing analysis. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Results from this study may help move treatment of IBS from a purely symptom based approach to a more individualized approach by stratifying IBS-D patients into distinct clinical phenotypes which are amenable to targeted therapeutic approaches. Cambridge University Press 2019-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6799797/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.75 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ncnd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
spellingShingle Clinical Epidemiology/Clinical Trial
Lee, Allen
Rao, Krishna
Haller, Emily
Dam, Lauren Van
Baker, Jason
Eswaran, Shanti
Chey, William
Young, Vincent
Owyang, Chung
Hasler, William
3185 A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Nonabsorbable Antibiotic Rifaximin vs. Dietary Intervention Low in Fermentable Sugars (FODMAP) in Irritable Bowel Syndrome
title 3185 A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Nonabsorbable Antibiotic Rifaximin vs. Dietary Intervention Low in Fermentable Sugars (FODMAP) in Irritable Bowel Syndrome
title_full 3185 A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Nonabsorbable Antibiotic Rifaximin vs. Dietary Intervention Low in Fermentable Sugars (FODMAP) in Irritable Bowel Syndrome
title_fullStr 3185 A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Nonabsorbable Antibiotic Rifaximin vs. Dietary Intervention Low in Fermentable Sugars (FODMAP) in Irritable Bowel Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed 3185 A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Nonabsorbable Antibiotic Rifaximin vs. Dietary Intervention Low in Fermentable Sugars (FODMAP) in Irritable Bowel Syndrome
title_short 3185 A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Nonabsorbable Antibiotic Rifaximin vs. Dietary Intervention Low in Fermentable Sugars (FODMAP) in Irritable Bowel Syndrome
title_sort 3185 a randomized controlled trial comparing the nonabsorbable antibiotic rifaximin vs. dietary intervention low in fermentable sugars (fodmap) in irritable bowel syndrome
topic Clinical Epidemiology/Clinical Trial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799797/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.75
work_keys_str_mv AT leeallen 3185arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingthenonabsorbableantibioticrifaximinvsdietaryinterventionlowinfermentablesugarsfodmapinirritablebowelsyndrome
AT raokrishna 3185arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingthenonabsorbableantibioticrifaximinvsdietaryinterventionlowinfermentablesugarsfodmapinirritablebowelsyndrome
AT halleremily 3185arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingthenonabsorbableantibioticrifaximinvsdietaryinterventionlowinfermentablesugarsfodmapinirritablebowelsyndrome
AT damlaurenvan 3185arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingthenonabsorbableantibioticrifaximinvsdietaryinterventionlowinfermentablesugarsfodmapinirritablebowelsyndrome
AT bakerjason 3185arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingthenonabsorbableantibioticrifaximinvsdietaryinterventionlowinfermentablesugarsfodmapinirritablebowelsyndrome
AT eswaranshanti 3185arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingthenonabsorbableantibioticrifaximinvsdietaryinterventionlowinfermentablesugarsfodmapinirritablebowelsyndrome
AT cheywilliam 3185arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingthenonabsorbableantibioticrifaximinvsdietaryinterventionlowinfermentablesugarsfodmapinirritablebowelsyndrome
AT youngvincent 3185arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingthenonabsorbableantibioticrifaximinvsdietaryinterventionlowinfermentablesugarsfodmapinirritablebowelsyndrome
AT owyangchung 3185arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingthenonabsorbableantibioticrifaximinvsdietaryinterventionlowinfermentablesugarsfodmapinirritablebowelsyndrome
AT haslerwilliam 3185arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingthenonabsorbableantibioticrifaximinvsdietaryinterventionlowinfermentablesugarsfodmapinirritablebowelsyndrome