Cargando…
Validation and perception of a key feature problem examination in neurology
OBJECTIVE: To validate a newly-developed Key Feature Problem Examination (KFPE) in neurology, and to examine how it is perceived by students. METHODS: We have developed a formative KFPE containing 12 key feature problems and 44 key feature items. The key feature problems covered four typical clinica...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799971/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31626678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224131 |
_version_ | 1783460404940242944 |
---|---|
author | Grumer, Meike Brüstle, Peter Lambeck, Johann Biller, Silke Brich, Jochen |
author_facet | Grumer, Meike Brüstle, Peter Lambeck, Johann Biller, Silke Brich, Jochen |
author_sort | Grumer, Meike |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To validate a newly-developed Key Feature Problem Examination (KFPE) in neurology, and to examine how it is perceived by students. METHODS: We have developed a formative KFPE containing 12 key feature problems and 44 key feature items. The key feature problems covered four typical clinical situations. The items were presented in short- and long-menu question formats. Third- and fourth-year medical students undergoing the Neurology Course at our department participated in this study. The students' perception of the KFPE was assessed via a questionnaire. Students also had to pass a summative multiple-choice question examination (MCQE) containing 39 Type-A questions. All key feature and multiple-choice questions were classified using a modified Bloom’s taxonomy. RESULTS: The results from 81 KFPE participants were analyzed. The average score was 6.7/12 points. Cronbach’s alpha for the 12 key-feature problems was 0.53. Item difficulty level scores were between 0.39 and 0.77, and item-total correlations between 0.05 and 0.36. Thirty-two key feature items of the KFPE were categorized as testers of comprehension, application and problem-solving, and 12 questions as testers of knowledge (MCQE: 15 comprehension and 24 knowledge, respectively). Overall correlations between the KFPE and the MCQE were intermediate. The KFPE was perceived well by the students. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to previously-established principles enables the creation of a valid KFPE in the field of Neurology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6799971 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67999712019-10-25 Validation and perception of a key feature problem examination in neurology Grumer, Meike Brüstle, Peter Lambeck, Johann Biller, Silke Brich, Jochen PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To validate a newly-developed Key Feature Problem Examination (KFPE) in neurology, and to examine how it is perceived by students. METHODS: We have developed a formative KFPE containing 12 key feature problems and 44 key feature items. The key feature problems covered four typical clinical situations. The items were presented in short- and long-menu question formats. Third- and fourth-year medical students undergoing the Neurology Course at our department participated in this study. The students' perception of the KFPE was assessed via a questionnaire. Students also had to pass a summative multiple-choice question examination (MCQE) containing 39 Type-A questions. All key feature and multiple-choice questions were classified using a modified Bloom’s taxonomy. RESULTS: The results from 81 KFPE participants were analyzed. The average score was 6.7/12 points. Cronbach’s alpha for the 12 key-feature problems was 0.53. Item difficulty level scores were between 0.39 and 0.77, and item-total correlations between 0.05 and 0.36. Thirty-two key feature items of the KFPE were categorized as testers of comprehension, application and problem-solving, and 12 questions as testers of knowledge (MCQE: 15 comprehension and 24 knowledge, respectively). Overall correlations between the KFPE and the MCQE were intermediate. The KFPE was perceived well by the students. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to previously-established principles enables the creation of a valid KFPE in the field of Neurology. Public Library of Science 2019-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6799971/ /pubmed/31626678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224131 Text en © 2019 Grumer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Grumer, Meike Brüstle, Peter Lambeck, Johann Biller, Silke Brich, Jochen Validation and perception of a key feature problem examination in neurology |
title | Validation and perception of a key feature problem examination in neurology |
title_full | Validation and perception of a key feature problem examination in neurology |
title_fullStr | Validation and perception of a key feature problem examination in neurology |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation and perception of a key feature problem examination in neurology |
title_short | Validation and perception of a key feature problem examination in neurology |
title_sort | validation and perception of a key feature problem examination in neurology |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799971/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31626678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224131 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grumermeike validationandperceptionofakeyfeatureproblemexaminationinneurology AT brustlepeter validationandperceptionofakeyfeatureproblemexaminationinneurology AT lambeckjohann validationandperceptionofakeyfeatureproblemexaminationinneurology AT billersilke validationandperceptionofakeyfeatureproblemexaminationinneurology AT brichjochen validationandperceptionofakeyfeatureproblemexaminationinneurology |