Cargando…

Validation and perception of a key feature problem examination in neurology

OBJECTIVE: To validate a newly-developed Key Feature Problem Examination (KFPE) in neurology, and to examine how it is perceived by students. METHODS: We have developed a formative KFPE containing 12 key feature problems and 44 key feature items. The key feature problems covered four typical clinica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grumer, Meike, Brüstle, Peter, Lambeck, Johann, Biller, Silke, Brich, Jochen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31626678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224131
_version_ 1783460404940242944
author Grumer, Meike
Brüstle, Peter
Lambeck, Johann
Biller, Silke
Brich, Jochen
author_facet Grumer, Meike
Brüstle, Peter
Lambeck, Johann
Biller, Silke
Brich, Jochen
author_sort Grumer, Meike
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To validate a newly-developed Key Feature Problem Examination (KFPE) in neurology, and to examine how it is perceived by students. METHODS: We have developed a formative KFPE containing 12 key feature problems and 44 key feature items. The key feature problems covered four typical clinical situations. The items were presented in short- and long-menu question formats. Third- and fourth-year medical students undergoing the Neurology Course at our department participated in this study. The students' perception of the KFPE was assessed via a questionnaire. Students also had to pass a summative multiple-choice question examination (MCQE) containing 39 Type-A questions. All key feature and multiple-choice questions were classified using a modified Bloom’s taxonomy. RESULTS: The results from 81 KFPE participants were analyzed. The average score was 6.7/12 points. Cronbach’s alpha for the 12 key-feature problems was 0.53. Item difficulty level scores were between 0.39 and 0.77, and item-total correlations between 0.05 and 0.36. Thirty-two key feature items of the KFPE were categorized as testers of comprehension, application and problem-solving, and 12 questions as testers of knowledge (MCQE: 15 comprehension and 24 knowledge, respectively). Overall correlations between the KFPE and the MCQE were intermediate. The KFPE was perceived well by the students. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to previously-established principles enables the creation of a valid KFPE in the field of Neurology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6799971
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67999712019-10-25 Validation and perception of a key feature problem examination in neurology Grumer, Meike Brüstle, Peter Lambeck, Johann Biller, Silke Brich, Jochen PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To validate a newly-developed Key Feature Problem Examination (KFPE) in neurology, and to examine how it is perceived by students. METHODS: We have developed a formative KFPE containing 12 key feature problems and 44 key feature items. The key feature problems covered four typical clinical situations. The items were presented in short- and long-menu question formats. Third- and fourth-year medical students undergoing the Neurology Course at our department participated in this study. The students' perception of the KFPE was assessed via a questionnaire. Students also had to pass a summative multiple-choice question examination (MCQE) containing 39 Type-A questions. All key feature and multiple-choice questions were classified using a modified Bloom’s taxonomy. RESULTS: The results from 81 KFPE participants were analyzed. The average score was 6.7/12 points. Cronbach’s alpha for the 12 key-feature problems was 0.53. Item difficulty level scores were between 0.39 and 0.77, and item-total correlations between 0.05 and 0.36. Thirty-two key feature items of the KFPE were categorized as testers of comprehension, application and problem-solving, and 12 questions as testers of knowledge (MCQE: 15 comprehension and 24 knowledge, respectively). Overall correlations between the KFPE and the MCQE were intermediate. The KFPE was perceived well by the students. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to previously-established principles enables the creation of a valid KFPE in the field of Neurology. Public Library of Science 2019-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6799971/ /pubmed/31626678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224131 Text en © 2019 Grumer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Grumer, Meike
Brüstle, Peter
Lambeck, Johann
Biller, Silke
Brich, Jochen
Validation and perception of a key feature problem examination in neurology
title Validation and perception of a key feature problem examination in neurology
title_full Validation and perception of a key feature problem examination in neurology
title_fullStr Validation and perception of a key feature problem examination in neurology
title_full_unstemmed Validation and perception of a key feature problem examination in neurology
title_short Validation and perception of a key feature problem examination in neurology
title_sort validation and perception of a key feature problem examination in neurology
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31626678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224131
work_keys_str_mv AT grumermeike validationandperceptionofakeyfeatureproblemexaminationinneurology
AT brustlepeter validationandperceptionofakeyfeatureproblemexaminationinneurology
AT lambeckjohann validationandperceptionofakeyfeatureproblemexaminationinneurology
AT billersilke validationandperceptionofakeyfeatureproblemexaminationinneurology
AT brichjochen validationandperceptionofakeyfeatureproblemexaminationinneurology