Cargando…

Evaluation of bioaerosol samplers for the detection and quantification of influenza virus from artificial aerosols and influenza virus–infected ferrets

BACKGROUND: Bioaerosol sampling devices are necessary for the characterization of infectious bioaerosols emitted by naturally‐infected hosts with acute respiratory virus infections. Assessment of these devices under multiple experimental conditions will provide insight for device use. OBJECTIVES: Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bekking, Christian, Yip, Lily, Groulx, Nicolas, Doggett, Nathan, Finn, Mairead, Mubareka, Samira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6800310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31541519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12678
_version_ 1783460424232992768
author Bekking, Christian
Yip, Lily
Groulx, Nicolas
Doggett, Nathan
Finn, Mairead
Mubareka, Samira
author_facet Bekking, Christian
Yip, Lily
Groulx, Nicolas
Doggett, Nathan
Finn, Mairead
Mubareka, Samira
author_sort Bekking, Christian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bioaerosol sampling devices are necessary for the characterization of infectious bioaerosols emitted by naturally‐infected hosts with acute respiratory virus infections. Assessment of these devices under multiple experimental conditions will provide insight for device use. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to assess and compare bioaerosol sampling devices using a) an in vitro, environmentally‐controlled artificial bioaerosol system at a range of different RH conditions and b) an in vivo bioaerosol system of influenza virus‐infected ferrets under controlled environmental conditions. Secondarily, we also sought to examine the impact of NSAIDs on bioaerosol emission in influenza virus‐infected ferrets to address its potential as a determinant of bioaerosol emission. METHODS: We examined the performance of low and moderate volume bioaerosol samplers for the collection of viral RNA and infectious influenza virus in vitroand in vivo using artificial bioaerosols and the ferret model of influenza virus infection. The following samplers were tested: the polytetrafluoroethylene filter (PTFE filter), the 2‐stage National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health cyclone sampler (NIOSH cyclone sampler) and the 6‐stage viable Andersen impactor (Andersen impactor). RESULTS: The PTFE filter and NIOSH cyclone sampler collected similar amounts of viral RNA and infectious virus from artificially‐generated aerosols under a range of relative humidities (RH). Using the ferret model, the PTFE filter, NIOSH cyclone sampler and the Andersen impactor collected up to 3.66 log(10)copies of RNA/L air, 3.84 log(10)copies of RNA/L air and 6.09 log(10)copies of RNA/L air respectively at peak recovery. Infectious virus was recovered from the PTFE filter and NIOSH cyclone samplers on the peak day of viral RNA recovery. CONCLUSION: The PTFE filter and NIOSH cyclone sampler are useful for influenza virus RNA and infectious virus collection and may be considered for clinical and environmental settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6800310
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68003102019-11-01 Evaluation of bioaerosol samplers for the detection and quantification of influenza virus from artificial aerosols and influenza virus–infected ferrets Bekking, Christian Yip, Lily Groulx, Nicolas Doggett, Nathan Finn, Mairead Mubareka, Samira Influenza Other Respir Viruses Original Articles BACKGROUND: Bioaerosol sampling devices are necessary for the characterization of infectious bioaerosols emitted by naturally‐infected hosts with acute respiratory virus infections. Assessment of these devices under multiple experimental conditions will provide insight for device use. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to assess and compare bioaerosol sampling devices using a) an in vitro, environmentally‐controlled artificial bioaerosol system at a range of different RH conditions and b) an in vivo bioaerosol system of influenza virus‐infected ferrets under controlled environmental conditions. Secondarily, we also sought to examine the impact of NSAIDs on bioaerosol emission in influenza virus‐infected ferrets to address its potential as a determinant of bioaerosol emission. METHODS: We examined the performance of low and moderate volume bioaerosol samplers for the collection of viral RNA and infectious influenza virus in vitroand in vivo using artificial bioaerosols and the ferret model of influenza virus infection. The following samplers were tested: the polytetrafluoroethylene filter (PTFE filter), the 2‐stage National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health cyclone sampler (NIOSH cyclone sampler) and the 6‐stage viable Andersen impactor (Andersen impactor). RESULTS: The PTFE filter and NIOSH cyclone sampler collected similar amounts of viral RNA and infectious virus from artificially‐generated aerosols under a range of relative humidities (RH). Using the ferret model, the PTFE filter, NIOSH cyclone sampler and the Andersen impactor collected up to 3.66 log(10)copies of RNA/L air, 3.84 log(10)copies of RNA/L air and 6.09 log(10)copies of RNA/L air respectively at peak recovery. Infectious virus was recovered from the PTFE filter and NIOSH cyclone samplers on the peak day of viral RNA recovery. CONCLUSION: The PTFE filter and NIOSH cyclone sampler are useful for influenza virus RNA and infectious virus collection and may be considered for clinical and environmental settings. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-21 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6800310/ /pubmed/31541519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12678 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Bekking, Christian
Yip, Lily
Groulx, Nicolas
Doggett, Nathan
Finn, Mairead
Mubareka, Samira
Evaluation of bioaerosol samplers for the detection and quantification of influenza virus from artificial aerosols and influenza virus–infected ferrets
title Evaluation of bioaerosol samplers for the detection and quantification of influenza virus from artificial aerosols and influenza virus–infected ferrets
title_full Evaluation of bioaerosol samplers for the detection and quantification of influenza virus from artificial aerosols and influenza virus–infected ferrets
title_fullStr Evaluation of bioaerosol samplers for the detection and quantification of influenza virus from artificial aerosols and influenza virus–infected ferrets
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of bioaerosol samplers for the detection and quantification of influenza virus from artificial aerosols and influenza virus–infected ferrets
title_short Evaluation of bioaerosol samplers for the detection and quantification of influenza virus from artificial aerosols and influenza virus–infected ferrets
title_sort evaluation of bioaerosol samplers for the detection and quantification of influenza virus from artificial aerosols and influenza virus–infected ferrets
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6800310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31541519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12678
work_keys_str_mv AT bekkingchristian evaluationofbioaerosolsamplersforthedetectionandquantificationofinfluenzavirusfromartificialaerosolsandinfluenzavirusinfectedferrets
AT yiplily evaluationofbioaerosolsamplersforthedetectionandquantificationofinfluenzavirusfromartificialaerosolsandinfluenzavirusinfectedferrets
AT groulxnicolas evaluationofbioaerosolsamplersforthedetectionandquantificationofinfluenzavirusfromartificialaerosolsandinfluenzavirusinfectedferrets
AT doggettnathan evaluationofbioaerosolsamplersforthedetectionandquantificationofinfluenzavirusfromartificialaerosolsandinfluenzavirusinfectedferrets
AT finnmairead evaluationofbioaerosolsamplersforthedetectionandquantificationofinfluenzavirusfromartificialaerosolsandinfluenzavirusinfectedferrets
AT mubarekasamira evaluationofbioaerosolsamplersforthedetectionandquantificationofinfluenzavirusfromartificialaerosolsandinfluenzavirusinfectedferrets