Cargando…
Metamorphic pressure variation in a coherent Alpine nappe challenges lithostatic pressure paradigm
Pressure–temperature–time paths obtained from minerals in metamorphic rocks allow the reconstruction of the geodynamic evolution of mountain ranges under the assumption that rock pressure is lithostatic. This lithostatic pressure paradigm enables converting the metamorphic pressure directly into the...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6800426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31628316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12727-z |
_version_ | 1783460440578195456 |
---|---|
author | Luisier, Cindy Baumgartner, Lukas Schmalholz, Stefan M. Siron, Guillaume Vennemann, Torsten |
author_facet | Luisier, Cindy Baumgartner, Lukas Schmalholz, Stefan M. Siron, Guillaume Vennemann, Torsten |
author_sort | Luisier, Cindy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pressure–temperature–time paths obtained from minerals in metamorphic rocks allow the reconstruction of the geodynamic evolution of mountain ranges under the assumption that rock pressure is lithostatic. This lithostatic pressure paradigm enables converting the metamorphic pressure directly into the rock’s burial depth and, hence, quantifying the rock’s burial and exhumation history. In the coherent Monte Rosa tectonic unit, Western Alps, considerably different metamorphic pressures are determined in adjacent rocks. Here we show with field and microstructural observations, phase petrology and geochemistry that these pressure differences cannot be explained by tectonic mixing, retrogression of high-pressure minerals, or lack of equilibration of mineral assemblages. We propose that the determined pressure difference of 0.8 ± 0.3 GPa is due to deviation from lithostatic pressure. We show with two analytical solutions for compression- and reaction-induced stress in mechanically heterogeneous rock that such pressure differences are mechanically feasible, supporting our interpretation of significant outcrop-scale pressure gradients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6800426 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68004262019-10-21 Metamorphic pressure variation in a coherent Alpine nappe challenges lithostatic pressure paradigm Luisier, Cindy Baumgartner, Lukas Schmalholz, Stefan M. Siron, Guillaume Vennemann, Torsten Nat Commun Article Pressure–temperature–time paths obtained from minerals in metamorphic rocks allow the reconstruction of the geodynamic evolution of mountain ranges under the assumption that rock pressure is lithostatic. This lithostatic pressure paradigm enables converting the metamorphic pressure directly into the rock’s burial depth and, hence, quantifying the rock’s burial and exhumation history. In the coherent Monte Rosa tectonic unit, Western Alps, considerably different metamorphic pressures are determined in adjacent rocks. Here we show with field and microstructural observations, phase petrology and geochemistry that these pressure differences cannot be explained by tectonic mixing, retrogression of high-pressure minerals, or lack of equilibration of mineral assemblages. We propose that the determined pressure difference of 0.8 ± 0.3 GPa is due to deviation from lithostatic pressure. We show with two analytical solutions for compression- and reaction-induced stress in mechanically heterogeneous rock that such pressure differences are mechanically feasible, supporting our interpretation of significant outcrop-scale pressure gradients. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6800426/ /pubmed/31628316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12727-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Luisier, Cindy Baumgartner, Lukas Schmalholz, Stefan M. Siron, Guillaume Vennemann, Torsten Metamorphic pressure variation in a coherent Alpine nappe challenges lithostatic pressure paradigm |
title | Metamorphic pressure variation in a coherent Alpine nappe challenges lithostatic pressure paradigm |
title_full | Metamorphic pressure variation in a coherent Alpine nappe challenges lithostatic pressure paradigm |
title_fullStr | Metamorphic pressure variation in a coherent Alpine nappe challenges lithostatic pressure paradigm |
title_full_unstemmed | Metamorphic pressure variation in a coherent Alpine nappe challenges lithostatic pressure paradigm |
title_short | Metamorphic pressure variation in a coherent Alpine nappe challenges lithostatic pressure paradigm |
title_sort | metamorphic pressure variation in a coherent alpine nappe challenges lithostatic pressure paradigm |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6800426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31628316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12727-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luisiercindy metamorphicpressurevariationinacoherentalpinenappechallengeslithostaticpressureparadigm AT baumgartnerlukas metamorphicpressurevariationinacoherentalpinenappechallengeslithostaticpressureparadigm AT schmalholzstefanm metamorphicpressurevariationinacoherentalpinenappechallengeslithostaticpressureparadigm AT sironguillaume metamorphicpressurevariationinacoherentalpinenappechallengeslithostaticpressureparadigm AT vennemanntorsten metamorphicpressurevariationinacoherentalpinenappechallengeslithostaticpressureparadigm |