Cargando…

Comparison of rapid BACpro® II, Sepsityper® kit and in-house preparation methods for direct identification of bacteria from blood cultures by MALDI-TOF MS with and without Sepsityper® module analysis

There are several approaches available for purifying microorganisms prior to matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) analysis. In the present study, rapid BACpro® II (Nittobo Medical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), a new application, has been compared wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kayin, Munevver, Mert, Berivan, Aydemir, Söhret, Özenci, Volkan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6800852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31494828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03654-4
_version_ 1783460481270284288
author Kayin, Munevver
Mert, Berivan
Aydemir, Söhret
Özenci, Volkan
author_facet Kayin, Munevver
Mert, Berivan
Aydemir, Söhret
Özenci, Volkan
author_sort Kayin, Munevver
collection PubMed
description There are several approaches available for purifying microorganisms prior to matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) analysis. In the present study, rapid BACpro® II (Nittobo Medical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), a new application, has been compared with Sepsityper® kit (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, USA) and an in-house method. Samples were also tested with two modules, standard and Sepsityper®, identified in the Bruker MALDI-TOF MS. The bottles having monomicrobial growth were included in the study according to Gram staining results. In total, two hundred blood culture bottles were included but there was no growth in one of the subcultures so 199 blood culture bottles were studied prospectively. With the standard MALDI-TOF MS analysis, rapid BACpro® II could successfully identify microorganisms in 174/199 (87.4%) of the bottles where Sepsityper® kit and in-house method were successful in 136/199 (68.3%) and 114/199 (57.3%), respectively. When the MALDI-TOF MS data were analysed by Sepsityper® module, the identification rates were increased to 94.4%, 82.1% and 69.8% (p < 0.001), respectively. In the Sepsityper® module, 72/73 (98.6%) of Gram-negative and 97/106 (91.5%) of Gram-positive microorganisms were detected by rapid BACpro® II method. The present study shows that rapid BACpro® II is a reliable preparation procedure and has higher rates of identification compared with Sepsityper® kit and in-house method. The use of the Sepsityper® module in blood cultures increases the chance of identification for all three methods studied.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6800852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68008522019-11-01 Comparison of rapid BACpro® II, Sepsityper® kit and in-house preparation methods for direct identification of bacteria from blood cultures by MALDI-TOF MS with and without Sepsityper® module analysis Kayin, Munevver Mert, Berivan Aydemir, Söhret Özenci, Volkan Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Original Article There are several approaches available for purifying microorganisms prior to matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) analysis. In the present study, rapid BACpro® II (Nittobo Medical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), a new application, has been compared with Sepsityper® kit (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, USA) and an in-house method. Samples were also tested with two modules, standard and Sepsityper®, identified in the Bruker MALDI-TOF MS. The bottles having monomicrobial growth were included in the study according to Gram staining results. In total, two hundred blood culture bottles were included but there was no growth in one of the subcultures so 199 blood culture bottles were studied prospectively. With the standard MALDI-TOF MS analysis, rapid BACpro® II could successfully identify microorganisms in 174/199 (87.4%) of the bottles where Sepsityper® kit and in-house method were successful in 136/199 (68.3%) and 114/199 (57.3%), respectively. When the MALDI-TOF MS data were analysed by Sepsityper® module, the identification rates were increased to 94.4%, 82.1% and 69.8% (p < 0.001), respectively. In the Sepsityper® module, 72/73 (98.6%) of Gram-negative and 97/106 (91.5%) of Gram-positive microorganisms were detected by rapid BACpro® II method. The present study shows that rapid BACpro® II is a reliable preparation procedure and has higher rates of identification compared with Sepsityper® kit and in-house method. The use of the Sepsityper® module in blood cultures increases the chance of identification for all three methods studied. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-09-07 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6800852/ /pubmed/31494828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03654-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kayin, Munevver
Mert, Berivan
Aydemir, Söhret
Özenci, Volkan
Comparison of rapid BACpro® II, Sepsityper® kit and in-house preparation methods for direct identification of bacteria from blood cultures by MALDI-TOF MS with and without Sepsityper® module analysis
title Comparison of rapid BACpro® II, Sepsityper® kit and in-house preparation methods for direct identification of bacteria from blood cultures by MALDI-TOF MS with and without Sepsityper® module analysis
title_full Comparison of rapid BACpro® II, Sepsityper® kit and in-house preparation methods for direct identification of bacteria from blood cultures by MALDI-TOF MS with and without Sepsityper® module analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of rapid BACpro® II, Sepsityper® kit and in-house preparation methods for direct identification of bacteria from blood cultures by MALDI-TOF MS with and without Sepsityper® module analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of rapid BACpro® II, Sepsityper® kit and in-house preparation methods for direct identification of bacteria from blood cultures by MALDI-TOF MS with and without Sepsityper® module analysis
title_short Comparison of rapid BACpro® II, Sepsityper® kit and in-house preparation methods for direct identification of bacteria from blood cultures by MALDI-TOF MS with and without Sepsityper® module analysis
title_sort comparison of rapid bacpro® ii, sepsityper® kit and in-house preparation methods for direct identification of bacteria from blood cultures by maldi-tof ms with and without sepsityper® module analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6800852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31494828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03654-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kayinmunevver comparisonofrapidbacproiisepsityperkitandinhousepreparationmethodsfordirectidentificationofbacteriafrombloodculturesbymalditofmswithandwithoutsepsitypermoduleanalysis
AT mertberivan comparisonofrapidbacproiisepsityperkitandinhousepreparationmethodsfordirectidentificationofbacteriafrombloodculturesbymalditofmswithandwithoutsepsitypermoduleanalysis
AT aydemirsohret comparisonofrapidbacproiisepsityperkitandinhousepreparationmethodsfordirectidentificationofbacteriafrombloodculturesbymalditofmswithandwithoutsepsitypermoduleanalysis
AT ozencivolkan comparisonofrapidbacproiisepsityperkitandinhousepreparationmethodsfordirectidentificationofbacteriafrombloodculturesbymalditofmswithandwithoutsepsitypermoduleanalysis