Cargando…
Medication in older patients reviewed multiple ways (MORE) study
Background Polypharmacy in older patients can lead to potentially inappropriate prescribing. The risk of the latter calls for effective medication review to ensure proper medication usage and safety. Objective Provide insight on the similarities and differences of medication review done in multiple...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6800858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31302885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-019-00879-3 |
_version_ | 1783460482790719488 |
---|---|
author | Zwietering, N. A. Westra, D. Winkens, B. Cremers, H. van der Kuy, P. H. M. Hurkens, K. P. |
author_facet | Zwietering, N. A. Westra, D. Winkens, B. Cremers, H. van der Kuy, P. H. M. Hurkens, K. P. |
author_sort | Zwietering, N. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background Polypharmacy in older patients can lead to potentially inappropriate prescribing. The risk of the latter calls for effective medication review to ensure proper medication usage and safety. Objective Provide insight on the similarities and differences of medication review done in multiple ways that may lead to future possibilities to optimize medication review. Setting This study was conducted in Zuyderland Medical Centre, the second largest teaching hospital in the Netherlands. Method This descriptive study compares the quantity and content of remarks identified by medication review performed by a geriatrician, outpatient pharmacist, and Clinical Decision Support System. The content of remarks is categorized in seven categories of possible pharmacotherapeutic problems: ‘indication without medication’, ‘medication without indication’, ‘contra-indication/interaction/side-effect’, ‘dosage problem’, ‘double medication’, ‘incorrect medication’ and ‘therapeutic drug monitoring’. Main outcome measure Number and content of remarks on medication review. Results The Clinical Decision Support System (1.8 ± 0.8 vs. 0.9 ± 0.9, p < 0.001) and outpatient pharmacist (1.8 ± 0.8 vs. 0.9 ± 0.9, p = 0.045) both noted remarks in significantly more categories than the geriatricians. The Clinical Decision Support System provided more remarks on ‘double medication’, ‘dosage problem’ and ‘contraindication/interaction/side effects’ than the geriatrician (p < 0.050), while the geriatrician did on ‘medication without indication’ (p < 0.001). The Clinical Decision Support System noted significantly more remarks on ‘contraindication/interaction/side effects’ and ‘therapeutic drug monitoring’ than the outpatient pharmacist, whereas the outpatient pharmacist reported more on ‘indication without medication’ and ‘medication without indication’ than the Clinical Decision Support System (p ≤ 0.007). Conclusion Medication review performed by a geriatrician, outpatient pharmacist, and Clinical Decision Support System provides different insights and should be combined to create a more comprehensive report on medication profiles. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6800858 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68008582019-11-01 Medication in older patients reviewed multiple ways (MORE) study Zwietering, N. A. Westra, D. Winkens, B. Cremers, H. van der Kuy, P. H. M. Hurkens, K. P. Int J Clin Pharm Research Article Background Polypharmacy in older patients can lead to potentially inappropriate prescribing. The risk of the latter calls for effective medication review to ensure proper medication usage and safety. Objective Provide insight on the similarities and differences of medication review done in multiple ways that may lead to future possibilities to optimize medication review. Setting This study was conducted in Zuyderland Medical Centre, the second largest teaching hospital in the Netherlands. Method This descriptive study compares the quantity and content of remarks identified by medication review performed by a geriatrician, outpatient pharmacist, and Clinical Decision Support System. The content of remarks is categorized in seven categories of possible pharmacotherapeutic problems: ‘indication without medication’, ‘medication without indication’, ‘contra-indication/interaction/side-effect’, ‘dosage problem’, ‘double medication’, ‘incorrect medication’ and ‘therapeutic drug monitoring’. Main outcome measure Number and content of remarks on medication review. Results The Clinical Decision Support System (1.8 ± 0.8 vs. 0.9 ± 0.9, p < 0.001) and outpatient pharmacist (1.8 ± 0.8 vs. 0.9 ± 0.9, p = 0.045) both noted remarks in significantly more categories than the geriatricians. The Clinical Decision Support System provided more remarks on ‘double medication’, ‘dosage problem’ and ‘contraindication/interaction/side effects’ than the geriatrician (p < 0.050), while the geriatrician did on ‘medication without indication’ (p < 0.001). The Clinical Decision Support System noted significantly more remarks on ‘contraindication/interaction/side effects’ and ‘therapeutic drug monitoring’ than the outpatient pharmacist, whereas the outpatient pharmacist reported more on ‘indication without medication’ and ‘medication without indication’ than the Clinical Decision Support System (p ≤ 0.007). Conclusion Medication review performed by a geriatrician, outpatient pharmacist, and Clinical Decision Support System provides different insights and should be combined to create a more comprehensive report on medication profiles. Springer International Publishing 2019-07-13 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6800858/ /pubmed/31302885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-019-00879-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zwietering, N. A. Westra, D. Winkens, B. Cremers, H. van der Kuy, P. H. M. Hurkens, K. P. Medication in older patients reviewed multiple ways (MORE) study |
title | Medication in older patients reviewed multiple ways (MORE) study |
title_full | Medication in older patients reviewed multiple ways (MORE) study |
title_fullStr | Medication in older patients reviewed multiple ways (MORE) study |
title_full_unstemmed | Medication in older patients reviewed multiple ways (MORE) study |
title_short | Medication in older patients reviewed multiple ways (MORE) study |
title_sort | medication in older patients reviewed multiple ways (more) study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6800858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31302885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-019-00879-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zwieteringna medicationinolderpatientsreviewedmultiplewaysmorestudy AT westrad medicationinolderpatientsreviewedmultiplewaysmorestudy AT winkensb medicationinolderpatientsreviewedmultiplewaysmorestudy AT cremersh medicationinolderpatientsreviewedmultiplewaysmorestudy AT vanderkuyphm medicationinolderpatientsreviewedmultiplewaysmorestudy AT hurkenskp medicationinolderpatientsreviewedmultiplewaysmorestudy |