Cargando…

Local Residents’ Perceptions for Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of Fenghe River Watershed

To make environmental management decisions more executive and targeted, it is essential for decision-making to include local residents’ perceptions and preferences for ecosystem services (ES) and biodiversity (BD). This study conducted a questionnaire survey with 386 local residents to explore socia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Hongjuan, Pang, Qian, Long, Huan, Zhu, Haochen, Gao, Xin, Li, Xiuqing, Jiang, Xiaohui, Liu, Kang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6801443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31561464
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193602
_version_ 1783460572721840128
author Zhang, Hongjuan
Pang, Qian
Long, Huan
Zhu, Haochen
Gao, Xin
Li, Xiuqing
Jiang, Xiaohui
Liu, Kang
author_facet Zhang, Hongjuan
Pang, Qian
Long, Huan
Zhu, Haochen
Gao, Xin
Li, Xiuqing
Jiang, Xiaohui
Liu, Kang
author_sort Zhang, Hongjuan
collection PubMed
description To make environmental management decisions more executive and targeted, it is essential for decision-making to include local residents’ perceptions and preferences for ecosystem services (ES) and biodiversity (BD). This study conducted a questionnaire survey with 386 local residents to explore social perceptions for ES and BD in the Fenghe River watershed. ES contain food from agriculture (AGR), food from livestock (LIV), fresh water (FW), air purification (AP), water purification (WP), water retention (WR), soil retention (SR), aesthetics (AES), recreation (RE), and spirit (SP) in this study. Ranking and Likert scales are combined to identify residents’ preferences for ES and BD. The hypothetical market method is used to identify the willingness to pay for BD and ES. Independent sample T-test, one-way ANOVA, and Spearman correlation are used to analyze preference heterogeneity. The results show that: (1) residents prefer WP, AP, AGR, and FW; (2) 51.3% of respondents are willing to pay a fee for improving ES while 48.7% of respondents are unwilling to pay; (3) residents’ personal and residential factors affect preference heterogeneity. Last, we put forward three management suggestions on controlling environmental pollution, improving residents’ awareness of ES, and establishing a multi-channel fund based on government financial resources for improving ES in the Fenghe River watershed. Integrating stakeholders’ perceptions for ES into decision-making can promote the sustainable development in Fenghe River watershed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6801443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68014432019-10-31 Local Residents’ Perceptions for Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of Fenghe River Watershed Zhang, Hongjuan Pang, Qian Long, Huan Zhu, Haochen Gao, Xin Li, Xiuqing Jiang, Xiaohui Liu, Kang Int J Environ Res Public Health Article To make environmental management decisions more executive and targeted, it is essential for decision-making to include local residents’ perceptions and preferences for ecosystem services (ES) and biodiversity (BD). This study conducted a questionnaire survey with 386 local residents to explore social perceptions for ES and BD in the Fenghe River watershed. ES contain food from agriculture (AGR), food from livestock (LIV), fresh water (FW), air purification (AP), water purification (WP), water retention (WR), soil retention (SR), aesthetics (AES), recreation (RE), and spirit (SP) in this study. Ranking and Likert scales are combined to identify residents’ preferences for ES and BD. The hypothetical market method is used to identify the willingness to pay for BD and ES. Independent sample T-test, one-way ANOVA, and Spearman correlation are used to analyze preference heterogeneity. The results show that: (1) residents prefer WP, AP, AGR, and FW; (2) 51.3% of respondents are willing to pay a fee for improving ES while 48.7% of respondents are unwilling to pay; (3) residents’ personal and residential factors affect preference heterogeneity. Last, we put forward three management suggestions on controlling environmental pollution, improving residents’ awareness of ES, and establishing a multi-channel fund based on government financial resources for improving ES in the Fenghe River watershed. Integrating stakeholders’ perceptions for ES into decision-making can promote the sustainable development in Fenghe River watershed. MDPI 2019-09-26 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6801443/ /pubmed/31561464 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193602 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Hongjuan
Pang, Qian
Long, Huan
Zhu, Haochen
Gao, Xin
Li, Xiuqing
Jiang, Xiaohui
Liu, Kang
Local Residents’ Perceptions for Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of Fenghe River Watershed
title Local Residents’ Perceptions for Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of Fenghe River Watershed
title_full Local Residents’ Perceptions for Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of Fenghe River Watershed
title_fullStr Local Residents’ Perceptions for Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of Fenghe River Watershed
title_full_unstemmed Local Residents’ Perceptions for Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of Fenghe River Watershed
title_short Local Residents’ Perceptions for Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of Fenghe River Watershed
title_sort local residents’ perceptions for ecosystem services: a case study of fenghe river watershed
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6801443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31561464
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193602
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanghongjuan localresidentsperceptionsforecosystemservicesacasestudyoffengheriverwatershed
AT pangqian localresidentsperceptionsforecosystemservicesacasestudyoffengheriverwatershed
AT longhuan localresidentsperceptionsforecosystemservicesacasestudyoffengheriverwatershed
AT zhuhaochen localresidentsperceptionsforecosystemservicesacasestudyoffengheriverwatershed
AT gaoxin localresidentsperceptionsforecosystemservicesacasestudyoffengheriverwatershed
AT lixiuqing localresidentsperceptionsforecosystemservicesacasestudyoffengheriverwatershed
AT jiangxiaohui localresidentsperceptionsforecosystemservicesacasestudyoffengheriverwatershed
AT liukang localresidentsperceptionsforecosystemservicesacasestudyoffengheriverwatershed