Cargando…

Evidence of Workplace Interventions—A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews

Work environment factors are highly correlated with employees’ health and well-being. Our aim was to sum up current evidence of health promotion interventions in the workplace, focusing on interventions for the prevention of musculoskeletal disorders, psychological and behavioral disorders as well a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pieper, Claudia, Schröer, Sarah, Eilerts, Anna-Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6801553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31547516
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193553
_version_ 1783460600460869632
author Pieper, Claudia
Schröer, Sarah
Eilerts, Anna-Lisa
author_facet Pieper, Claudia
Schröer, Sarah
Eilerts, Anna-Lisa
author_sort Pieper, Claudia
collection PubMed
description Work environment factors are highly correlated with employees’ health and well-being. Our aim was to sum up current evidence of health promotion interventions in the workplace, focusing on interventions for the prevention of musculoskeletal disorders, psychological and behavioral disorders as well as interventions for older employees and economic evaluations. We conducted a comprehensive literature search including systematic reviews published from April 2012 to October 2017 in electronic databases and search engines, websites of relevant organizations and institutions. It consisted of simple and specific terms and word combinations related to workplace health promotion based on the search strategy of a previous review. After full-text screening, 74 references met the eligibility criteria. Using the same search strategy, there was a higher proportion of relevant high-quality studies as compared with the earlier review. The heterogeneity of health promotion interventions regarding intervention components, settings and study populations still limits the comparability of studies. Future studies should also address the societal and insurer perspective, including costs to the worker such as lost income and lost time at work of family members due to caregiving activities. To this end, more high-quality evidence is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6801553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68015532019-10-31 Evidence of Workplace Interventions—A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews Pieper, Claudia Schröer, Sarah Eilerts, Anna-Lisa Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Work environment factors are highly correlated with employees’ health and well-being. Our aim was to sum up current evidence of health promotion interventions in the workplace, focusing on interventions for the prevention of musculoskeletal disorders, psychological and behavioral disorders as well as interventions for older employees and economic evaluations. We conducted a comprehensive literature search including systematic reviews published from April 2012 to October 2017 in electronic databases and search engines, websites of relevant organizations and institutions. It consisted of simple and specific terms and word combinations related to workplace health promotion based on the search strategy of a previous review. After full-text screening, 74 references met the eligibility criteria. Using the same search strategy, there was a higher proportion of relevant high-quality studies as compared with the earlier review. The heterogeneity of health promotion interventions regarding intervention components, settings and study populations still limits the comparability of studies. Future studies should also address the societal and insurer perspective, including costs to the worker such as lost income and lost time at work of family members due to caregiving activities. To this end, more high-quality evidence is needed. MDPI 2019-09-23 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6801553/ /pubmed/31547516 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193553 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Pieper, Claudia
Schröer, Sarah
Eilerts, Anna-Lisa
Evidence of Workplace Interventions—A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
title Evidence of Workplace Interventions—A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
title_full Evidence of Workplace Interventions—A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
title_fullStr Evidence of Workplace Interventions—A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
title_full_unstemmed Evidence of Workplace Interventions—A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
title_short Evidence of Workplace Interventions—A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
title_sort evidence of workplace interventions—a systematic review of systematic reviews
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6801553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31547516
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193553
work_keys_str_mv AT pieperclaudia evidenceofworkplaceinterventionsasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT schroersarah evidenceofworkplaceinterventionsasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT eilertsannalisa evidenceofworkplaceinterventionsasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews