Cargando…

Myosin Cross-Bridge Behaviour in Contracting Muscle—The T(1) Curve of Huxley and Simmons (1971) Revisited

The stiffness of the myosin cross-bridges is a key factor in analysing possible scenarios to explain myosin head changes during force generation in active muscles. The seminal study of Huxley and Simmons (1971: Nature 233: 533) suggested that most of the observed half-sarcomere instantaneous complia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knupp, Carlo, Squire, John M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6801930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31581677
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194892
_version_ 1783460694951198720
author Knupp, Carlo
Squire, John M.
author_facet Knupp, Carlo
Squire, John M.
author_sort Knupp, Carlo
collection PubMed
description The stiffness of the myosin cross-bridges is a key factor in analysing possible scenarios to explain myosin head changes during force generation in active muscles. The seminal study of Huxley and Simmons (1971: Nature 233: 533) suggested that most of the observed half-sarcomere instantaneous compliance (=1/stiffness) resides in the myosin heads. They showed with a so-called T(1) plot that, after a very fast release, the half-sarcomere tension reduced to zero after a step size of about 60Å (later with improved experiments reduced to 40Å). However, later X-ray diffraction studies showed that myosin and actin filaments themselves stretch slightly under tension, which means that most (at least two-thirds) of the half sarcomere compliance comes from the filaments and not from cross-bridges. Here we have used a different approach, namely to model the compliances in a virtual half sarcomere structure in silico. We confirm that the T(1) curve comes almost entirely from length changes in the myosin and actin filaments, because the calculated cross-bridge stiffness (probably greater than 0.4 pN/Å) is higher than previous studies have suggested. Our model demonstrates that the formulations produced by previous authors give very similar results to our model if the same starting parameters are used. However, we find that it is necessary to model the X-ray diffraction data as well as mechanics data to get a reliable estimate of the cross-bridge stiffness. In the light of the high cross-bridge stiffness found in the present study, we present a plausible modified scenario to describe aspects of the myosin cross-bridge cycle in active muscle. In particular, we suggest that, apart from the filament compliances, most of the cross-bridge contribution to the instantaneous T(1) response may come from weakly-bound myosin heads, not myosin heads in strongly attached states. The strongly attached heads would still contribute to the T(1) curve, but only in a very minor way, with a stiffness that we postulate could be around 0.1 pN/Å, a value which would generate a working stroke close to 100 Å from the hydrolysis of one ATP molecule. The new model can serve as a tool to calculate sarcomere elastic properties for any vertebrate striated muscle once various parameters have been determined (e.g., tension, T(1) intercept, temperature, X-ray diffraction spacing results).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6801930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68019302019-10-31 Myosin Cross-Bridge Behaviour in Contracting Muscle—The T(1) Curve of Huxley and Simmons (1971) Revisited Knupp, Carlo Squire, John M. Int J Mol Sci Article The stiffness of the myosin cross-bridges is a key factor in analysing possible scenarios to explain myosin head changes during force generation in active muscles. The seminal study of Huxley and Simmons (1971: Nature 233: 533) suggested that most of the observed half-sarcomere instantaneous compliance (=1/stiffness) resides in the myosin heads. They showed with a so-called T(1) plot that, after a very fast release, the half-sarcomere tension reduced to zero after a step size of about 60Å (later with improved experiments reduced to 40Å). However, later X-ray diffraction studies showed that myosin and actin filaments themselves stretch slightly under tension, which means that most (at least two-thirds) of the half sarcomere compliance comes from the filaments and not from cross-bridges. Here we have used a different approach, namely to model the compliances in a virtual half sarcomere structure in silico. We confirm that the T(1) curve comes almost entirely from length changes in the myosin and actin filaments, because the calculated cross-bridge stiffness (probably greater than 0.4 pN/Å) is higher than previous studies have suggested. Our model demonstrates that the formulations produced by previous authors give very similar results to our model if the same starting parameters are used. However, we find that it is necessary to model the X-ray diffraction data as well as mechanics data to get a reliable estimate of the cross-bridge stiffness. In the light of the high cross-bridge stiffness found in the present study, we present a plausible modified scenario to describe aspects of the myosin cross-bridge cycle in active muscle. In particular, we suggest that, apart from the filament compliances, most of the cross-bridge contribution to the instantaneous T(1) response may come from weakly-bound myosin heads, not myosin heads in strongly attached states. The strongly attached heads would still contribute to the T(1) curve, but only in a very minor way, with a stiffness that we postulate could be around 0.1 pN/Å, a value which would generate a working stroke close to 100 Å from the hydrolysis of one ATP molecule. The new model can serve as a tool to calculate sarcomere elastic properties for any vertebrate striated muscle once various parameters have been determined (e.g., tension, T(1) intercept, temperature, X-ray diffraction spacing results). MDPI 2019-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6801930/ /pubmed/31581677 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194892 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Knupp, Carlo
Squire, John M.
Myosin Cross-Bridge Behaviour in Contracting Muscle—The T(1) Curve of Huxley and Simmons (1971) Revisited
title Myosin Cross-Bridge Behaviour in Contracting Muscle—The T(1) Curve of Huxley and Simmons (1971) Revisited
title_full Myosin Cross-Bridge Behaviour in Contracting Muscle—The T(1) Curve of Huxley and Simmons (1971) Revisited
title_fullStr Myosin Cross-Bridge Behaviour in Contracting Muscle—The T(1) Curve of Huxley and Simmons (1971) Revisited
title_full_unstemmed Myosin Cross-Bridge Behaviour in Contracting Muscle—The T(1) Curve of Huxley and Simmons (1971) Revisited
title_short Myosin Cross-Bridge Behaviour in Contracting Muscle—The T(1) Curve of Huxley and Simmons (1971) Revisited
title_sort myosin cross-bridge behaviour in contracting muscle—the t(1) curve of huxley and simmons (1971) revisited
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6801930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31581677
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194892
work_keys_str_mv AT knuppcarlo myosincrossbridgebehaviourincontractingmusclethet1curveofhuxleyandsimmons1971revisited
AT squirejohnm myosincrossbridgebehaviourincontractingmusclethet1curveofhuxleyandsimmons1971revisited