Cargando…

Selecting a Bedside Cognitive Vital Sign to Monitor Cognition in Hospital: Feasibility, Reliability, and Responsiveness of Logical Memory

Although there is a high prevalence of delirium and cognitive impairment among hospitalised older adults, short, reliable cognitive measures are rarely used to monitor cognition and potentially alert healthcare professionals to early changes that might signal delirium. We evaluated the reliability,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nicholas, Padraic, O’Caoimh, Rónán, Gao, Yang, Habib, Afsana, Mross, Thomas Karol, Clarnette, Roger, Molloy, D. William
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6801972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31546698
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193545
_version_ 1783460705277575168
author Nicholas, Padraic
O’Caoimh, Rónán
Gao, Yang
Habib, Afsana
Mross, Thomas Karol
Clarnette, Roger
Molloy, D. William
author_facet Nicholas, Padraic
O’Caoimh, Rónán
Gao, Yang
Habib, Afsana
Mross, Thomas Karol
Clarnette, Roger
Molloy, D. William
author_sort Nicholas, Padraic
collection PubMed
description Although there is a high prevalence of delirium and cognitive impairment among hospitalised older adults, short, reliable cognitive measures are rarely used to monitor cognition and potentially alert healthcare professionals to early changes that might signal delirium. We evaluated the reliability, responsiveness, and feasibility of logical memory (LM), immediate verbal recall of a short story, compared to brief tests of attention as a bedside “cognitive vital sign” (CVS). Trained nursing staff performed twice-daily cognitive assessments on 84 clinically stable inpatients in two geriatric units over 3–5 consecutive days using LM and short tests of attention and orientation including months of the year backwards. Scores were compared to those of an expert rater. Inter-rater reliability was excellent with correlation coefficients for LM increasing from r = 0.87 on day 1 to r = 0.97 by day 4 (p < 0.0001). A diurnal fluctuation of two points from a total of 30 was deemed acceptable in clinically stable patients. LM scores were statistically similar (p = 0.98) with repeated testing (suggesting no learning effect). All nurses reported that LM was feasible to score routinely. LM is a reliable measure of cognition showing diurnal variation but minimal learning effects. Further study is required to define the properties of an ideal CVS test, though LM may satisfy these.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6801972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68019722019-10-31 Selecting a Bedside Cognitive Vital Sign to Monitor Cognition in Hospital: Feasibility, Reliability, and Responsiveness of Logical Memory Nicholas, Padraic O’Caoimh, Rónán Gao, Yang Habib, Afsana Mross, Thomas Karol Clarnette, Roger Molloy, D. William Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Although there is a high prevalence of delirium and cognitive impairment among hospitalised older adults, short, reliable cognitive measures are rarely used to monitor cognition and potentially alert healthcare professionals to early changes that might signal delirium. We evaluated the reliability, responsiveness, and feasibility of logical memory (LM), immediate verbal recall of a short story, compared to brief tests of attention as a bedside “cognitive vital sign” (CVS). Trained nursing staff performed twice-daily cognitive assessments on 84 clinically stable inpatients in two geriatric units over 3–5 consecutive days using LM and short tests of attention and orientation including months of the year backwards. Scores were compared to those of an expert rater. Inter-rater reliability was excellent with correlation coefficients for LM increasing from r = 0.87 on day 1 to r = 0.97 by day 4 (p < 0.0001). A diurnal fluctuation of two points from a total of 30 was deemed acceptable in clinically stable patients. LM scores were statistically similar (p = 0.98) with repeated testing (suggesting no learning effect). All nurses reported that LM was feasible to score routinely. LM is a reliable measure of cognition showing diurnal variation but minimal learning effects. Further study is required to define the properties of an ideal CVS test, though LM may satisfy these. MDPI 2019-09-22 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6801972/ /pubmed/31546698 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193545 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nicholas, Padraic
O’Caoimh, Rónán
Gao, Yang
Habib, Afsana
Mross, Thomas Karol
Clarnette, Roger
Molloy, D. William
Selecting a Bedside Cognitive Vital Sign to Monitor Cognition in Hospital: Feasibility, Reliability, and Responsiveness of Logical Memory
title Selecting a Bedside Cognitive Vital Sign to Monitor Cognition in Hospital: Feasibility, Reliability, and Responsiveness of Logical Memory
title_full Selecting a Bedside Cognitive Vital Sign to Monitor Cognition in Hospital: Feasibility, Reliability, and Responsiveness of Logical Memory
title_fullStr Selecting a Bedside Cognitive Vital Sign to Monitor Cognition in Hospital: Feasibility, Reliability, and Responsiveness of Logical Memory
title_full_unstemmed Selecting a Bedside Cognitive Vital Sign to Monitor Cognition in Hospital: Feasibility, Reliability, and Responsiveness of Logical Memory
title_short Selecting a Bedside Cognitive Vital Sign to Monitor Cognition in Hospital: Feasibility, Reliability, and Responsiveness of Logical Memory
title_sort selecting a bedside cognitive vital sign to monitor cognition in hospital: feasibility, reliability, and responsiveness of logical memory
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6801972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31546698
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193545
work_keys_str_mv AT nicholaspadraic selectingabedsidecognitivevitalsigntomonitorcognitioninhospitalfeasibilityreliabilityandresponsivenessoflogicalmemory
AT ocaoimhronan selectingabedsidecognitivevitalsigntomonitorcognitioninhospitalfeasibilityreliabilityandresponsivenessoflogicalmemory
AT gaoyang selectingabedsidecognitivevitalsigntomonitorcognitioninhospitalfeasibilityreliabilityandresponsivenessoflogicalmemory
AT habibafsana selectingabedsidecognitivevitalsigntomonitorcognitioninhospitalfeasibilityreliabilityandresponsivenessoflogicalmemory
AT mrossthomaskarol selectingabedsidecognitivevitalsigntomonitorcognitioninhospitalfeasibilityreliabilityandresponsivenessoflogicalmemory
AT clarnetteroger selectingabedsidecognitivevitalsigntomonitorcognitioninhospitalfeasibilityreliabilityandresponsivenessoflogicalmemory
AT molloydwilliam selectingabedsidecognitivevitalsigntomonitorcognitioninhospitalfeasibilityreliabilityandresponsivenessoflogicalmemory