Cargando…

Patterns of livestock depredation and cost‐effectiveness of fortified livestock enclosures in northern Tanzania

Human–carnivore conflicts and retaliatory killings contribute to carnivore populations' declines around the world. Strategies to mitigate conflicts have been developed, but their efficacy is rarely assessed in a randomized case–control design. Further, the economic costs prevent the adoption an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kissui, Bernard M., Kiffner, Christian, König, Hannes J., Montgomery, Robert A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6802044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31641483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5644
_version_ 1783460722415501312
author Kissui, Bernard M.
Kiffner, Christian
König, Hannes J.
Montgomery, Robert A.
author_facet Kissui, Bernard M.
Kiffner, Christian
König, Hannes J.
Montgomery, Robert A.
author_sort Kissui, Bernard M.
collection PubMed
description Human–carnivore conflicts and retaliatory killings contribute to carnivore populations' declines around the world. Strategies to mitigate conflicts have been developed, but their efficacy is rarely assessed in a randomized case–control design. Further, the economic costs prevent the adoption and wide use of conflict mitigation strategies by pastoralists in rural Africa. We examined carnivore (African lion [Panthera leo], leopard [Panthera pardus], spotted hyena [Crocuta crocuta], jackal [Canis mesomelas], and cheetah [Acinonyx jubatus]) raids on fortified (n = 45, total 631 monthly visits) and unfortified (traditional, n = 45, total 521 monthly visits) livestock enclosures (“bomas”) in northern Tanzania. The study aimed to (a) assess the extent of retaliatory killings of major carnivore species due to livestock depredation, (b) describe the spatiotemporal characteristics of carnivore raids on livestock enclosures, (c) analyze whether spatial covariates influenced livestock depredation risk in livestock enclosures, and (d) examine the cost‐effectiveness of livestock enclosure fortification. Results suggest that (a) majority of boma raids by carnivores were caused by spotted hyenas (nearly 90% of all raids), but retaliatory killings mainly targeted lions, (b) carnivore raid attempts were rare at individual households (0.081 raid attempts/month in fortified enclosures and 0.102 raid attempts/month in unfortified enclosures), and (c) spotted hyena raid attempts increased in the wet season compared with the dry season, and owners of fortified bomas reported less hyena raid attempts than owners of unfortified bomas. Landscape and habitat variables tested, did not strongly drive the spatial patterns of spotted hyena raids in livestock bomas. Carnivore raids varied randomly both spatially (village to village) and temporally (year to year). The cost‐benefit analysis suggest that investing in boma fortification yielded positive net present values after two to three years. Thus, enclosure fortification is a cost‐effective strategy to promote coexistence of carnivores and humans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6802044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68020442019-10-22 Patterns of livestock depredation and cost‐effectiveness of fortified livestock enclosures in northern Tanzania Kissui, Bernard M. Kiffner, Christian König, Hannes J. Montgomery, Robert A. Ecol Evol Original Research Human–carnivore conflicts and retaliatory killings contribute to carnivore populations' declines around the world. Strategies to mitigate conflicts have been developed, but their efficacy is rarely assessed in a randomized case–control design. Further, the economic costs prevent the adoption and wide use of conflict mitigation strategies by pastoralists in rural Africa. We examined carnivore (African lion [Panthera leo], leopard [Panthera pardus], spotted hyena [Crocuta crocuta], jackal [Canis mesomelas], and cheetah [Acinonyx jubatus]) raids on fortified (n = 45, total 631 monthly visits) and unfortified (traditional, n = 45, total 521 monthly visits) livestock enclosures (“bomas”) in northern Tanzania. The study aimed to (a) assess the extent of retaliatory killings of major carnivore species due to livestock depredation, (b) describe the spatiotemporal characteristics of carnivore raids on livestock enclosures, (c) analyze whether spatial covariates influenced livestock depredation risk in livestock enclosures, and (d) examine the cost‐effectiveness of livestock enclosure fortification. Results suggest that (a) majority of boma raids by carnivores were caused by spotted hyenas (nearly 90% of all raids), but retaliatory killings mainly targeted lions, (b) carnivore raid attempts were rare at individual households (0.081 raid attempts/month in fortified enclosures and 0.102 raid attempts/month in unfortified enclosures), and (c) spotted hyena raid attempts increased in the wet season compared with the dry season, and owners of fortified bomas reported less hyena raid attempts than owners of unfortified bomas. Landscape and habitat variables tested, did not strongly drive the spatial patterns of spotted hyena raids in livestock bomas. Carnivore raids varied randomly both spatially (village to village) and temporally (year to year). The cost‐benefit analysis suggest that investing in boma fortification yielded positive net present values after two to three years. Thus, enclosure fortification is a cost‐effective strategy to promote coexistence of carnivores and humans. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6802044/ /pubmed/31641483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5644 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kissui, Bernard M.
Kiffner, Christian
König, Hannes J.
Montgomery, Robert A.
Patterns of livestock depredation and cost‐effectiveness of fortified livestock enclosures in northern Tanzania
title Patterns of livestock depredation and cost‐effectiveness of fortified livestock enclosures in northern Tanzania
title_full Patterns of livestock depredation and cost‐effectiveness of fortified livestock enclosures in northern Tanzania
title_fullStr Patterns of livestock depredation and cost‐effectiveness of fortified livestock enclosures in northern Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Patterns of livestock depredation and cost‐effectiveness of fortified livestock enclosures in northern Tanzania
title_short Patterns of livestock depredation and cost‐effectiveness of fortified livestock enclosures in northern Tanzania
title_sort patterns of livestock depredation and cost‐effectiveness of fortified livestock enclosures in northern tanzania
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6802044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31641483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5644
work_keys_str_mv AT kissuibernardm patternsoflivestockdepredationandcosteffectivenessoffortifiedlivestockenclosuresinnortherntanzania
AT kiffnerchristian patternsoflivestockdepredationandcosteffectivenessoffortifiedlivestockenclosuresinnortherntanzania
AT konighannesj patternsoflivestockdepredationandcosteffectivenessoffortifiedlivestockenclosuresinnortherntanzania
AT montgomeryroberta patternsoflivestockdepredationandcosteffectivenessoffortifiedlivestockenclosuresinnortherntanzania