Cargando…
Storage media and not extraction method has the biggest impact on recovery of bacteria from the oral microbiome
Next Generation sequencing has greatly progressed the exploration of the oral microbiome’s role in dental diseases, however, there has been little focus on the effect of sample storage conditions and their interaction with DNA extraction method. Dental plaque samples collected from 20 healthy partic...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6802381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31628387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51448-7 |
_version_ | 1783460789070331904 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Xiaoyan Nanayakkara, Shanika Gao, Jin-Long Nguyen, Ky-Anh Adler, Christina J. |
author_facet | Zhou, Xiaoyan Nanayakkara, Shanika Gao, Jin-Long Nguyen, Ky-Anh Adler, Christina J. |
author_sort | Zhou, Xiaoyan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Next Generation sequencing has greatly progressed the exploration of the oral microbiome’s role in dental diseases, however, there has been little focus on the effect of sample storage conditions and their interaction with DNA extraction method. Dental plaque samples collected from 20 healthy participants were pooled and stored in either 75% ethanol or Bead solution for up to 6-months at −80 °C, prior to DNA extraction with either QIAamp (non-bead beating) or PowerSoil (bead-beating) kit, followed by Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA gene. We found that storage media and not extraction method had the biggest influence on the diversity and abundance of the oral microbiota recovered. Samples stored in Bead solution, independent of the extraction kit, retrieved higher diversity (PowerSoil p = 1.64E-07, QIAamp p = 0.0085) and had dissimilar overall ecologies as indicated by lower level of shared diversity (PowerSoil p = 0.0000237, QIAamp p = 0.0088). Comparatively, samples stored in Bead solution and extracted with PowerSoil recovered a higher abundance of Streptococcus species. These data indicate that Bead solution can preserve the oral microbiome in dental plaque reliably, for periods of up to 6-months at −80 °C, and is compatible, with either a bead-beating or non-bead beating DNA extraction method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6802381 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68023812019-10-24 Storage media and not extraction method has the biggest impact on recovery of bacteria from the oral microbiome Zhou, Xiaoyan Nanayakkara, Shanika Gao, Jin-Long Nguyen, Ky-Anh Adler, Christina J. Sci Rep Article Next Generation sequencing has greatly progressed the exploration of the oral microbiome’s role in dental diseases, however, there has been little focus on the effect of sample storage conditions and their interaction with DNA extraction method. Dental plaque samples collected from 20 healthy participants were pooled and stored in either 75% ethanol or Bead solution for up to 6-months at −80 °C, prior to DNA extraction with either QIAamp (non-bead beating) or PowerSoil (bead-beating) kit, followed by Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA gene. We found that storage media and not extraction method had the biggest influence on the diversity and abundance of the oral microbiota recovered. Samples stored in Bead solution, independent of the extraction kit, retrieved higher diversity (PowerSoil p = 1.64E-07, QIAamp p = 0.0085) and had dissimilar overall ecologies as indicated by lower level of shared diversity (PowerSoil p = 0.0000237, QIAamp p = 0.0088). Comparatively, samples stored in Bead solution and extracted with PowerSoil recovered a higher abundance of Streptococcus species. These data indicate that Bead solution can preserve the oral microbiome in dental plaque reliably, for periods of up to 6-months at −80 °C, and is compatible, with either a bead-beating or non-bead beating DNA extraction method. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6802381/ /pubmed/31628387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51448-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Zhou, Xiaoyan Nanayakkara, Shanika Gao, Jin-Long Nguyen, Ky-Anh Adler, Christina J. Storage media and not extraction method has the biggest impact on recovery of bacteria from the oral microbiome |
title | Storage media and not extraction method has the biggest impact on recovery of bacteria from the oral microbiome |
title_full | Storage media and not extraction method has the biggest impact on recovery of bacteria from the oral microbiome |
title_fullStr | Storage media and not extraction method has the biggest impact on recovery of bacteria from the oral microbiome |
title_full_unstemmed | Storage media and not extraction method has the biggest impact on recovery of bacteria from the oral microbiome |
title_short | Storage media and not extraction method has the biggest impact on recovery of bacteria from the oral microbiome |
title_sort | storage media and not extraction method has the biggest impact on recovery of bacteria from the oral microbiome |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6802381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31628387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51448-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhouxiaoyan storagemediaandnotextractionmethodhasthebiggestimpactonrecoveryofbacteriafromtheoralmicrobiome AT nanayakkarashanika storagemediaandnotextractionmethodhasthebiggestimpactonrecoveryofbacteriafromtheoralmicrobiome AT gaojinlong storagemediaandnotextractionmethodhasthebiggestimpactonrecoveryofbacteriafromtheoralmicrobiome AT nguyenkyanh storagemediaandnotextractionmethodhasthebiggestimpactonrecoveryofbacteriafromtheoralmicrobiome AT adlerchristinaj storagemediaandnotextractionmethodhasthebiggestimpactonrecoveryofbacteriafromtheoralmicrobiome |