Cargando…
Online, cross-disciplinary team science training for health and medical professionals: Evaluation of COALESCE (teamscience.net)
INTRODUCTION: The National Academies of Sciences (NAS) emphasize the need for interdisciplinary team science (TS) training, but few training resources are available. COALESCE, an open-access tool developed with National Institutes of Health support and located at teamscience.net, is considered a gol...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6802413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31660230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.383 |
_version_ | 1783460794215694336 |
---|---|
author | Spring, Bonnie Klyachko, Ekaterina A. Rak, Phillip W. McFadden, H. Gene Hedeker, Donald Siddique, Juned Bardsley, Leland R. Pfammatter, Angela Fidler |
author_facet | Spring, Bonnie Klyachko, Ekaterina A. Rak, Phillip W. McFadden, H. Gene Hedeker, Donald Siddique, Juned Bardsley, Leland R. Pfammatter, Angela Fidler |
author_sort | Spring, Bonnie |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The National Academies of Sciences (NAS) emphasize the need for interdisciplinary team science (TS) training, but few training resources are available. COALESCE, an open-access tool developed with National Institutes of Health support and located at teamscience.net, is considered a gold standard resource but has not previously been evaluated. COALESCE launched four learning modules in 2011. The Science of TS (SciTS) module, an interactive encyclopedia, introduces foundational concepts. Three scenario-based modules simulate TS challenges in behavioral, clinical, and basic biomedical sciences. This study examined user characteristics, usage patterns, and effects of completing the four modules on TS knowledge, attitudes, and skills. METHODS: Repeated measures ANOVA tested for pre-post changes in performance and compared learning by users with biomedical versus other disciplinary backgrounds. RESULTS: From 2011 through 2017, the site attracted 16,280 new users who engaged in 6461 sessions that lasted more than 1 min. The modal registrant identified as working in a biomedical field (47%), in an academic institution (72%), and expressed greater interest in the practice than the SciTS (67%). Those completing pre- and post-tests (n = 989) showed significant improvement in knowledge, attitudes, and skills after taking all scenario-based modules (p < 0.005); knowledge and attitudes were unchanged after the SciTS encyclopedia. Biomedical and other health professionals improved comparably. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of the TS training tool at teamscience.net indicates broad dissemination and positive TS-related outcomes. Site upgrades implemented between 2018 and 2020, including adding five new modules, are expected to increase the robustness and accessibility of the COALESCE training resource. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6802413 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68024132019-10-28 Online, cross-disciplinary team science training for health and medical professionals: Evaluation of COALESCE (teamscience.net) Spring, Bonnie Klyachko, Ekaterina A. Rak, Phillip W. McFadden, H. Gene Hedeker, Donald Siddique, Juned Bardsley, Leland R. Pfammatter, Angela Fidler J Clin Transl Sci Research Article INTRODUCTION: The National Academies of Sciences (NAS) emphasize the need for interdisciplinary team science (TS) training, but few training resources are available. COALESCE, an open-access tool developed with National Institutes of Health support and located at teamscience.net, is considered a gold standard resource but has not previously been evaluated. COALESCE launched four learning modules in 2011. The Science of TS (SciTS) module, an interactive encyclopedia, introduces foundational concepts. Three scenario-based modules simulate TS challenges in behavioral, clinical, and basic biomedical sciences. This study examined user characteristics, usage patterns, and effects of completing the four modules on TS knowledge, attitudes, and skills. METHODS: Repeated measures ANOVA tested for pre-post changes in performance and compared learning by users with biomedical versus other disciplinary backgrounds. RESULTS: From 2011 through 2017, the site attracted 16,280 new users who engaged in 6461 sessions that lasted more than 1 min. The modal registrant identified as working in a biomedical field (47%), in an academic institution (72%), and expressed greater interest in the practice than the SciTS (67%). Those completing pre- and post-tests (n = 989) showed significant improvement in knowledge, attitudes, and skills after taking all scenario-based modules (p < 0.005); knowledge and attitudes were unchanged after the SciTS encyclopedia. Biomedical and other health professionals improved comparably. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of the TS training tool at teamscience.net indicates broad dissemination and positive TS-related outcomes. Site upgrades implemented between 2018 and 2020, including adding five new modules, are expected to increase the robustness and accessibility of the COALESCE training resource. Cambridge University Press 2019-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6802413/ /pubmed/31660230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.383 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ncnd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ncnd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Spring, Bonnie Klyachko, Ekaterina A. Rak, Phillip W. McFadden, H. Gene Hedeker, Donald Siddique, Juned Bardsley, Leland R. Pfammatter, Angela Fidler Online, cross-disciplinary team science training for health and medical professionals: Evaluation of COALESCE (teamscience.net) |
title | Online, cross-disciplinary team science training for health and medical professionals: Evaluation of COALESCE (teamscience.net) |
title_full | Online, cross-disciplinary team science training for health and medical professionals: Evaluation of COALESCE (teamscience.net) |
title_fullStr | Online, cross-disciplinary team science training for health and medical professionals: Evaluation of COALESCE (teamscience.net) |
title_full_unstemmed | Online, cross-disciplinary team science training for health and medical professionals: Evaluation of COALESCE (teamscience.net) |
title_short | Online, cross-disciplinary team science training for health and medical professionals: Evaluation of COALESCE (teamscience.net) |
title_sort | online, cross-disciplinary team science training for health and medical professionals: evaluation of coalesce (teamscience.net) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6802413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31660230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.383 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT springbonnie onlinecrossdisciplinaryteamsciencetrainingforhealthandmedicalprofessionalsevaluationofcoalesceteamsciencenet AT klyachkoekaterinaa onlinecrossdisciplinaryteamsciencetrainingforhealthandmedicalprofessionalsevaluationofcoalesceteamsciencenet AT rakphillipw onlinecrossdisciplinaryteamsciencetrainingforhealthandmedicalprofessionalsevaluationofcoalesceteamsciencenet AT mcfaddenhgene onlinecrossdisciplinaryteamsciencetrainingforhealthandmedicalprofessionalsevaluationofcoalesceteamsciencenet AT hedekerdonald onlinecrossdisciplinaryteamsciencetrainingforhealthandmedicalprofessionalsevaluationofcoalesceteamsciencenet AT siddiquejuned onlinecrossdisciplinaryteamsciencetrainingforhealthandmedicalprofessionalsevaluationofcoalesceteamsciencenet AT bardsleylelandr onlinecrossdisciplinaryteamsciencetrainingforhealthandmedicalprofessionalsevaluationofcoalesceteamsciencenet AT pfammatterangelafidler onlinecrossdisciplinaryteamsciencetrainingforhealthandmedicalprofessionalsevaluationofcoalesceteamsciencenet |