Cargando…

Online, cross-disciplinary team science training for health and medical professionals: Evaluation of COALESCE (teamscience.net)

INTRODUCTION: The National Academies of Sciences (NAS) emphasize the need for interdisciplinary team science (TS) training, but few training resources are available. COALESCE, an open-access tool developed with National Institutes of Health support and located at teamscience.net, is considered a gol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spring, Bonnie, Klyachko, Ekaterina A., Rak, Phillip W., McFadden, H. Gene, Hedeker, Donald, Siddique, Juned, Bardsley, Leland R., Pfammatter, Angela Fidler
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6802413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31660230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.383
_version_ 1783460794215694336
author Spring, Bonnie
Klyachko, Ekaterina A.
Rak, Phillip W.
McFadden, H. Gene
Hedeker, Donald
Siddique, Juned
Bardsley, Leland R.
Pfammatter, Angela Fidler
author_facet Spring, Bonnie
Klyachko, Ekaterina A.
Rak, Phillip W.
McFadden, H. Gene
Hedeker, Donald
Siddique, Juned
Bardsley, Leland R.
Pfammatter, Angela Fidler
author_sort Spring, Bonnie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The National Academies of Sciences (NAS) emphasize the need for interdisciplinary team science (TS) training, but few training resources are available. COALESCE, an open-access tool developed with National Institutes of Health support and located at teamscience.net, is considered a gold standard resource but has not previously been evaluated. COALESCE launched four learning modules in 2011. The Science of TS (SciTS) module, an interactive encyclopedia, introduces foundational concepts. Three scenario-based modules simulate TS challenges in behavioral, clinical, and basic biomedical sciences. This study examined user characteristics, usage patterns, and effects of completing the four modules on TS knowledge, attitudes, and skills. METHODS: Repeated measures ANOVA tested for pre-post changes in performance and compared learning by users with biomedical versus other disciplinary backgrounds. RESULTS: From 2011 through 2017, the site attracted 16,280 new users who engaged in 6461 sessions that lasted more than 1 min. The modal registrant identified as working in a biomedical field (47%), in an academic institution (72%), and expressed greater interest in the practice than the SciTS (67%). Those completing pre- and post-tests (n = 989) showed significant improvement in knowledge, attitudes, and skills after taking all scenario-based modules (p < 0.005); knowledge and attitudes were unchanged after the SciTS encyclopedia. Biomedical and other health professionals improved comparably. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of the TS training tool at teamscience.net indicates broad dissemination and positive TS-related outcomes. Site upgrades implemented between 2018 and 2020, including adding five new modules, are expected to increase the robustness and accessibility of the COALESCE training resource.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6802413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68024132019-10-28 Online, cross-disciplinary team science training for health and medical professionals: Evaluation of COALESCE (teamscience.net) Spring, Bonnie Klyachko, Ekaterina A. Rak, Phillip W. McFadden, H. Gene Hedeker, Donald Siddique, Juned Bardsley, Leland R. Pfammatter, Angela Fidler J Clin Transl Sci Research Article INTRODUCTION: The National Academies of Sciences (NAS) emphasize the need for interdisciplinary team science (TS) training, but few training resources are available. COALESCE, an open-access tool developed with National Institutes of Health support and located at teamscience.net, is considered a gold standard resource but has not previously been evaluated. COALESCE launched four learning modules in 2011. The Science of TS (SciTS) module, an interactive encyclopedia, introduces foundational concepts. Three scenario-based modules simulate TS challenges in behavioral, clinical, and basic biomedical sciences. This study examined user characteristics, usage patterns, and effects of completing the four modules on TS knowledge, attitudes, and skills. METHODS: Repeated measures ANOVA tested for pre-post changes in performance and compared learning by users with biomedical versus other disciplinary backgrounds. RESULTS: From 2011 through 2017, the site attracted 16,280 new users who engaged in 6461 sessions that lasted more than 1 min. The modal registrant identified as working in a biomedical field (47%), in an academic institution (72%), and expressed greater interest in the practice than the SciTS (67%). Those completing pre- and post-tests (n = 989) showed significant improvement in knowledge, attitudes, and skills after taking all scenario-based modules (p < 0.005); knowledge and attitudes were unchanged after the SciTS encyclopedia. Biomedical and other health professionals improved comparably. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of the TS training tool at teamscience.net indicates broad dissemination and positive TS-related outcomes. Site upgrades implemented between 2018 and 2020, including adding five new modules, are expected to increase the robustness and accessibility of the COALESCE training resource. Cambridge University Press 2019-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6802413/ /pubmed/31660230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.383 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ncnd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ncnd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
spellingShingle Research Article
Spring, Bonnie
Klyachko, Ekaterina A.
Rak, Phillip W.
McFadden, H. Gene
Hedeker, Donald
Siddique, Juned
Bardsley, Leland R.
Pfammatter, Angela Fidler
Online, cross-disciplinary team science training for health and medical professionals: Evaluation of COALESCE (teamscience.net)
title Online, cross-disciplinary team science training for health and medical professionals: Evaluation of COALESCE (teamscience.net)
title_full Online, cross-disciplinary team science training for health and medical professionals: Evaluation of COALESCE (teamscience.net)
title_fullStr Online, cross-disciplinary team science training for health and medical professionals: Evaluation of COALESCE (teamscience.net)
title_full_unstemmed Online, cross-disciplinary team science training for health and medical professionals: Evaluation of COALESCE (teamscience.net)
title_short Online, cross-disciplinary team science training for health and medical professionals: Evaluation of COALESCE (teamscience.net)
title_sort online, cross-disciplinary team science training for health and medical professionals: evaluation of coalesce (teamscience.net)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6802413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31660230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.383
work_keys_str_mv AT springbonnie onlinecrossdisciplinaryteamsciencetrainingforhealthandmedicalprofessionalsevaluationofcoalesceteamsciencenet
AT klyachkoekaterinaa onlinecrossdisciplinaryteamsciencetrainingforhealthandmedicalprofessionalsevaluationofcoalesceteamsciencenet
AT rakphillipw onlinecrossdisciplinaryteamsciencetrainingforhealthandmedicalprofessionalsevaluationofcoalesceteamsciencenet
AT mcfaddenhgene onlinecrossdisciplinaryteamsciencetrainingforhealthandmedicalprofessionalsevaluationofcoalesceteamsciencenet
AT hedekerdonald onlinecrossdisciplinaryteamsciencetrainingforhealthandmedicalprofessionalsevaluationofcoalesceteamsciencenet
AT siddiquejuned onlinecrossdisciplinaryteamsciencetrainingforhealthandmedicalprofessionalsevaluationofcoalesceteamsciencenet
AT bardsleylelandr onlinecrossdisciplinaryteamsciencetrainingforhealthandmedicalprofessionalsevaluationofcoalesceteamsciencenet
AT pfammatterangelafidler onlinecrossdisciplinaryteamsciencetrainingforhealthandmedicalprofessionalsevaluationofcoalesceteamsciencenet