Cargando…

The Value of Innovation to Implementation Program (VI(2)P): A strategic approach to aligning and leveraging academic research and clinical care missions

PROBLEM: Inefficient implementation of evidence‐based care garners increasing attention as a source of suboptimal value of clinical care, and integration of quality improvement methodology into clinical practice represents a potential solution. Academic medical centers (AMCs) often have expertise in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jing, Williams, Mark V., Page, Cecilia, Cassis, Lisa, Kern, Philip A., DiPaola, Robert S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6802527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31641687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10199
_version_ 1783460805656707072
author Li, Jing
Williams, Mark V.
Page, Cecilia
Cassis, Lisa
Kern, Philip A.
DiPaola, Robert S.
author_facet Li, Jing
Williams, Mark V.
Page, Cecilia
Cassis, Lisa
Kern, Philip A.
DiPaola, Robert S.
author_sort Li, Jing
collection PubMed
description PROBLEM: Inefficient implementation of evidence‐based care garners increasing attention as a source of suboptimal value of clinical care, and integration of quality improvement methodology into clinical practice represents a potential solution. Academic medical centers (AMCs) often have expertise in implementation science, yet it is not leveraged effectively to solve operational inefficiencies or to rapidly implement evidence‐based practices (EBPs). APPROACH: To leverage in‐house research expertise, the University of Kentucky (UK) College of Medicine and Center for Health Services Research (CHSR) launched a pilot awards program—Value of Innovation to Implementation Program (VI(2)P)—across its health system and six health professional colleges. Criteria for awards included a transdisciplinary research team and addressing health disparity issues faced by Kentucky. Outcome measures included EBP adoption and implementation and future funding. OUTCOMES: The VI(2)P produced 26 transdisciplinary teams that submitted letters of intent. Ten teams were invited to submit full proposal, and four projects were selected for award, spanning the entire continuum of health‐impact research. Three nonawarded projects were implemented and prompted system redesign for an “implementation research living laboratory.” A Workgroup for ImplementatioN Science (WINS) was established to forge transdisciplinary teams to pursue federal grant funding yielding proposals totaling $17.17 million submitted, $4.38 million awarded, and $5.97 million under review. Junior faculty were encouraged to pursue implementation science as a research focus. NEXT STEPS: UK WINS will continue serve as the hub for dissemination and implementation researchers at UK. On the basis of the enthusiasm expressed by multiple groups and many inquiries about the future training opportunities at UK, we plan to develop a tailored dissemination and implementation (D&I) training program to build research and practice capacity at UK.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6802527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68025272019-10-22 The Value of Innovation to Implementation Program (VI(2)P): A strategic approach to aligning and leveraging academic research and clinical care missions Li, Jing Williams, Mark V. Page, Cecilia Cassis, Lisa Kern, Philip A. DiPaola, Robert S. Learn Health Syst Experience Report PROBLEM: Inefficient implementation of evidence‐based care garners increasing attention as a source of suboptimal value of clinical care, and integration of quality improvement methodology into clinical practice represents a potential solution. Academic medical centers (AMCs) often have expertise in implementation science, yet it is not leveraged effectively to solve operational inefficiencies or to rapidly implement evidence‐based practices (EBPs). APPROACH: To leverage in‐house research expertise, the University of Kentucky (UK) College of Medicine and Center for Health Services Research (CHSR) launched a pilot awards program—Value of Innovation to Implementation Program (VI(2)P)—across its health system and six health professional colleges. Criteria for awards included a transdisciplinary research team and addressing health disparity issues faced by Kentucky. Outcome measures included EBP adoption and implementation and future funding. OUTCOMES: The VI(2)P produced 26 transdisciplinary teams that submitted letters of intent. Ten teams were invited to submit full proposal, and four projects were selected for award, spanning the entire continuum of health‐impact research. Three nonawarded projects were implemented and prompted system redesign for an “implementation research living laboratory.” A Workgroup for ImplementatioN Science (WINS) was established to forge transdisciplinary teams to pursue federal grant funding yielding proposals totaling $17.17 million submitted, $4.38 million awarded, and $5.97 million under review. Junior faculty were encouraged to pursue implementation science as a research focus. NEXT STEPS: UK WINS will continue serve as the hub for dissemination and implementation researchers at UK. On the basis of the enthusiasm expressed by multiple groups and many inquiries about the future training opportunities at UK, we plan to develop a tailored dissemination and implementation (D&I) training program to build research and practice capacity at UK. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6802527/ /pubmed/31641687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10199 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Learning Health Systems published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the University of Michigan This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Experience Report
Li, Jing
Williams, Mark V.
Page, Cecilia
Cassis, Lisa
Kern, Philip A.
DiPaola, Robert S.
The Value of Innovation to Implementation Program (VI(2)P): A strategic approach to aligning and leveraging academic research and clinical care missions
title The Value of Innovation to Implementation Program (VI(2)P): A strategic approach to aligning and leveraging academic research and clinical care missions
title_full The Value of Innovation to Implementation Program (VI(2)P): A strategic approach to aligning and leveraging academic research and clinical care missions
title_fullStr The Value of Innovation to Implementation Program (VI(2)P): A strategic approach to aligning and leveraging academic research and clinical care missions
title_full_unstemmed The Value of Innovation to Implementation Program (VI(2)P): A strategic approach to aligning and leveraging academic research and clinical care missions
title_short The Value of Innovation to Implementation Program (VI(2)P): A strategic approach to aligning and leveraging academic research and clinical care missions
title_sort value of innovation to implementation program (vi(2)p): a strategic approach to aligning and leveraging academic research and clinical care missions
topic Experience Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6802527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31641687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10199
work_keys_str_mv AT lijing thevalueofinnovationtoimplementationprogramvi2pastrategicapproachtoaligningandleveragingacademicresearchandclinicalcaremissions
AT williamsmarkv thevalueofinnovationtoimplementationprogramvi2pastrategicapproachtoaligningandleveragingacademicresearchandclinicalcaremissions
AT pagececilia thevalueofinnovationtoimplementationprogramvi2pastrategicapproachtoaligningandleveragingacademicresearchandclinicalcaremissions
AT cassislisa thevalueofinnovationtoimplementationprogramvi2pastrategicapproachtoaligningandleveragingacademicresearchandclinicalcaremissions
AT kernphilipa thevalueofinnovationtoimplementationprogramvi2pastrategicapproachtoaligningandleveragingacademicresearchandclinicalcaremissions
AT dipaolaroberts thevalueofinnovationtoimplementationprogramvi2pastrategicapproachtoaligningandleveragingacademicresearchandclinicalcaremissions
AT lijing valueofinnovationtoimplementationprogramvi2pastrategicapproachtoaligningandleveragingacademicresearchandclinicalcaremissions
AT williamsmarkv valueofinnovationtoimplementationprogramvi2pastrategicapproachtoaligningandleveragingacademicresearchandclinicalcaremissions
AT pagececilia valueofinnovationtoimplementationprogramvi2pastrategicapproachtoaligningandleveragingacademicresearchandclinicalcaremissions
AT cassislisa valueofinnovationtoimplementationprogramvi2pastrategicapproachtoaligningandleveragingacademicresearchandclinicalcaremissions
AT kernphilipa valueofinnovationtoimplementationprogramvi2pastrategicapproachtoaligningandleveragingacademicresearchandclinicalcaremissions
AT dipaolaroberts valueofinnovationtoimplementationprogramvi2pastrategicapproachtoaligningandleveragingacademicresearchandclinicalcaremissions