Cargando…
A framework for analysing learning health systems: Are we removing the most impactful barriers?
INTRODUCTION: Learning health systems (LHS) are one of the major computing advances in health care. However, no prior research has systematically analysed barriers and facilitators for LHS. This paper presents an investigation into the barriers, benefits, and facilitating factors for LHS in order to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6802533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31641685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10189 |
_version_ | 1783460806899269632 |
---|---|
author | McLachlan, Scott Dube, Kudakwashe Johnson, Owen Buchanan, Derek Potts, Henry W.W. Gallagher, Thomas Fenton, Norman |
author_facet | McLachlan, Scott Dube, Kudakwashe Johnson, Owen Buchanan, Derek Potts, Henry W.W. Gallagher, Thomas Fenton, Norman |
author_sort | McLachlan, Scott |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Learning health systems (LHS) are one of the major computing advances in health care. However, no prior research has systematically analysed barriers and facilitators for LHS. This paper presents an investigation into the barriers, benefits, and facilitating factors for LHS in order to create a basis for their successful implementation and adoption. METHODS: First, the ITPOSMO‐BBF framework was developed based on the established ITPOSMO (information, technology, processes, objectives, staffing, management, and other factors) framework, extending it for analysing barriers, benefits, and facilitators. Second, the new framework was applied to LHS. RESULTS: We found that LHS shares similar barriers and facilitators with electronic health records (EHR); in particular, most facilitator effort in implementing EHR and LHS goes towards barriers categorised as human factors, even though they were seen to carry fewer benefits. Barriers whose resolution would bring significant benefits in safety, quality, and health outcomes remain. LHS envisage constant generation of new clinical knowledge and practice based on the central role of collections of EHR. Once LHS are constructed and operational, they trigger new data streams into the EHR. So LHS and EHR have a symbiotic relationship. The implementation and adoption of EHRs have proved and continues to prove challenging, and there are many lessons for LHS arising from these challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Successful adoption of LHS should take account of the framework proposed in this paper, especially with respect to its focus on removing barriers that have the most impact. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6802533 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68025332019-10-22 A framework for analysing learning health systems: Are we removing the most impactful barriers? McLachlan, Scott Dube, Kudakwashe Johnson, Owen Buchanan, Derek Potts, Henry W.W. Gallagher, Thomas Fenton, Norman Learn Health Syst Research Reports INTRODUCTION: Learning health systems (LHS) are one of the major computing advances in health care. However, no prior research has systematically analysed barriers and facilitators for LHS. This paper presents an investigation into the barriers, benefits, and facilitating factors for LHS in order to create a basis for their successful implementation and adoption. METHODS: First, the ITPOSMO‐BBF framework was developed based on the established ITPOSMO (information, technology, processes, objectives, staffing, management, and other factors) framework, extending it for analysing barriers, benefits, and facilitators. Second, the new framework was applied to LHS. RESULTS: We found that LHS shares similar barriers and facilitators with electronic health records (EHR); in particular, most facilitator effort in implementing EHR and LHS goes towards barriers categorised as human factors, even though they were seen to carry fewer benefits. Barriers whose resolution would bring significant benefits in safety, quality, and health outcomes remain. LHS envisage constant generation of new clinical knowledge and practice based on the central role of collections of EHR. Once LHS are constructed and operational, they trigger new data streams into the EHR. So LHS and EHR have a symbiotic relationship. The implementation and adoption of EHRs have proved and continues to prove challenging, and there are many lessons for LHS arising from these challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Successful adoption of LHS should take account of the framework proposed in this paper, especially with respect to its focus on removing barriers that have the most impact. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6802533/ /pubmed/31641685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10189 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Learning Health Systems published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the University of Michigan This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Reports McLachlan, Scott Dube, Kudakwashe Johnson, Owen Buchanan, Derek Potts, Henry W.W. Gallagher, Thomas Fenton, Norman A framework for analysing learning health systems: Are we removing the most impactful barriers? |
title | A framework for analysing learning health systems: Are we removing the most impactful barriers? |
title_full | A framework for analysing learning health systems: Are we removing the most impactful barriers? |
title_fullStr | A framework for analysing learning health systems: Are we removing the most impactful barriers? |
title_full_unstemmed | A framework for analysing learning health systems: Are we removing the most impactful barriers? |
title_short | A framework for analysing learning health systems: Are we removing the most impactful barriers? |
title_sort | framework for analysing learning health systems: are we removing the most impactful barriers? |
topic | Research Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6802533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31641685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10189 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mclachlanscott aframeworkforanalysinglearninghealthsystemsareweremovingthemostimpactfulbarriers AT dubekudakwashe aframeworkforanalysinglearninghealthsystemsareweremovingthemostimpactfulbarriers AT johnsonowen aframeworkforanalysinglearninghealthsystemsareweremovingthemostimpactfulbarriers AT buchananderek aframeworkforanalysinglearninghealthsystemsareweremovingthemostimpactfulbarriers AT pottshenryww aframeworkforanalysinglearninghealthsystemsareweremovingthemostimpactfulbarriers AT gallagherthomas aframeworkforanalysinglearninghealthsystemsareweremovingthemostimpactfulbarriers AT fentonnorman aframeworkforanalysinglearninghealthsystemsareweremovingthemostimpactfulbarriers AT mclachlanscott frameworkforanalysinglearninghealthsystemsareweremovingthemostimpactfulbarriers AT dubekudakwashe frameworkforanalysinglearninghealthsystemsareweremovingthemostimpactfulbarriers AT johnsonowen frameworkforanalysinglearninghealthsystemsareweremovingthemostimpactfulbarriers AT buchananderek frameworkforanalysinglearninghealthsystemsareweremovingthemostimpactfulbarriers AT pottshenryww frameworkforanalysinglearninghealthsystemsareweremovingthemostimpactfulbarriers AT gallagherthomas frameworkforanalysinglearninghealthsystemsareweremovingthemostimpactfulbarriers AT fentonnorman frameworkforanalysinglearninghealthsystemsareweremovingthemostimpactfulbarriers |