Cargando…
Biomechanically-Corrected Intraocular Pressure Compared To Pressure Measured With Commonly Used Tonometers In Normal Subjects
PURPOSE: To compare the biomechanically-corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) measured by the Corvis ST (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) with IOP measurements made by other commonly used tonometers; and to test the correlations between IOP measures and central corneal thickness. METHODS: One randomly-sele...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6802558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31802962 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S220776 |
_version_ | 1783460810042900480 |
---|---|
author | Sedaghat, Mohammad-Reza Momeni-Moghaddam, Hamed Yekta, AbbasAli Elsheikh, Ahmed Khabazkhoob, Mehdi Ambrósio Jr, Renato Maddah, Nasim Danesh, Zeynab |
author_facet | Sedaghat, Mohammad-Reza Momeni-Moghaddam, Hamed Yekta, AbbasAli Elsheikh, Ahmed Khabazkhoob, Mehdi Ambrósio Jr, Renato Maddah, Nasim Danesh, Zeynab |
author_sort | Sedaghat, Mohammad-Reza |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare the biomechanically-corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) measured by the Corvis ST (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) with IOP measurements made by other commonly used tonometers; and to test the correlations between IOP measures and central corneal thickness. METHODS: One randomly-selected eye from each of 94 healthy subjects was assessed. The bIOP was determined by the CorVis ST and compared with the IOP measurements made by standard Goldmann Applanation Tonometer (GAT: Haag-Streit AG, Bern, Switzerland), the Icare (Icare Finland Oy, Vantaa, Finland), and the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA-IOPcc: Reichert, New York, USA). Corneal thickness was assessed by the Oculus Pentacam. The correlation between bIOP and the other devices and between CCT were assessed using the Pearson correlation test or Spearman’s rho test accordingly to the distribution of these values. The Bland-Altman method and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to assess the agreement of bIOP results with IOP obtained with other techniques. The limits of agreement (LoA) were determined as the mean difference ±1.96 SD of the mean differences. In all tests, the significance level was considered to be 0.05. RESULTS: Mean and SD of the bIOP were 16.11±1.66 mmHg. Significant differences were found between the bIOP and other IOP measurements (GAT, 3.02±2.60 mmHg, p<0.001, Icare, 1.51±2.95 mmHg, p<0.001, IOPcc, 1.09±1.96 mmHg, p<0.001). The lowest and highest mean differences in IOP were with the IOPcc and GAT, respectively. Interestingly, there were no significant differences in bIOP, GAT-IOP and ORA-IOPcc between the eyes with thin or thick corneal thicknesses, with Icare-IOP being the only exception (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The Corvis bIOP has a higher correlation with the IOPcc by ORA, which are also compensated for the effects of corneal biomechanics and have less association with corneal thickness relative to the uncorrected GAT and Icare measurements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6802558 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68025582019-12-04 Biomechanically-Corrected Intraocular Pressure Compared To Pressure Measured With Commonly Used Tonometers In Normal Subjects Sedaghat, Mohammad-Reza Momeni-Moghaddam, Hamed Yekta, AbbasAli Elsheikh, Ahmed Khabazkhoob, Mehdi Ambrósio Jr, Renato Maddah, Nasim Danesh, Zeynab Clin Optom (Auckl) Original Research PURPOSE: To compare the biomechanically-corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) measured by the Corvis ST (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) with IOP measurements made by other commonly used tonometers; and to test the correlations between IOP measures and central corneal thickness. METHODS: One randomly-selected eye from each of 94 healthy subjects was assessed. The bIOP was determined by the CorVis ST and compared with the IOP measurements made by standard Goldmann Applanation Tonometer (GAT: Haag-Streit AG, Bern, Switzerland), the Icare (Icare Finland Oy, Vantaa, Finland), and the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA-IOPcc: Reichert, New York, USA). Corneal thickness was assessed by the Oculus Pentacam. The correlation between bIOP and the other devices and between CCT were assessed using the Pearson correlation test or Spearman’s rho test accordingly to the distribution of these values. The Bland-Altman method and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to assess the agreement of bIOP results with IOP obtained with other techniques. The limits of agreement (LoA) were determined as the mean difference ±1.96 SD of the mean differences. In all tests, the significance level was considered to be 0.05. RESULTS: Mean and SD of the bIOP were 16.11±1.66 mmHg. Significant differences were found between the bIOP and other IOP measurements (GAT, 3.02±2.60 mmHg, p<0.001, Icare, 1.51±2.95 mmHg, p<0.001, IOPcc, 1.09±1.96 mmHg, p<0.001). The lowest and highest mean differences in IOP were with the IOPcc and GAT, respectively. Interestingly, there were no significant differences in bIOP, GAT-IOP and ORA-IOPcc between the eyes with thin or thick corneal thicknesses, with Icare-IOP being the only exception (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The Corvis bIOP has a higher correlation with the IOPcc by ORA, which are also compensated for the effects of corneal biomechanics and have less association with corneal thickness relative to the uncorrected GAT and Icare measurements. Dove 2019-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6802558/ /pubmed/31802962 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S220776 Text en © 2019 Sedaghat et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Sedaghat, Mohammad-Reza Momeni-Moghaddam, Hamed Yekta, AbbasAli Elsheikh, Ahmed Khabazkhoob, Mehdi Ambrósio Jr, Renato Maddah, Nasim Danesh, Zeynab Biomechanically-Corrected Intraocular Pressure Compared To Pressure Measured With Commonly Used Tonometers In Normal Subjects |
title | Biomechanically-Corrected Intraocular Pressure Compared To Pressure Measured With Commonly Used Tonometers In Normal Subjects |
title_full | Biomechanically-Corrected Intraocular Pressure Compared To Pressure Measured With Commonly Used Tonometers In Normal Subjects |
title_fullStr | Biomechanically-Corrected Intraocular Pressure Compared To Pressure Measured With Commonly Used Tonometers In Normal Subjects |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanically-Corrected Intraocular Pressure Compared To Pressure Measured With Commonly Used Tonometers In Normal Subjects |
title_short | Biomechanically-Corrected Intraocular Pressure Compared To Pressure Measured With Commonly Used Tonometers In Normal Subjects |
title_sort | biomechanically-corrected intraocular pressure compared to pressure measured with commonly used tonometers in normal subjects |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6802558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31802962 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S220776 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sedaghatmohammadreza biomechanicallycorrectedintraocularpressurecomparedtopressuremeasuredwithcommonlyusedtonometersinnormalsubjects AT momenimoghaddamhamed biomechanicallycorrectedintraocularpressurecomparedtopressuremeasuredwithcommonlyusedtonometersinnormalsubjects AT yektaabbasali biomechanicallycorrectedintraocularpressurecomparedtopressuremeasuredwithcommonlyusedtonometersinnormalsubjects AT elsheikhahmed biomechanicallycorrectedintraocularpressurecomparedtopressuremeasuredwithcommonlyusedtonometersinnormalsubjects AT khabazkhoobmehdi biomechanicallycorrectedintraocularpressurecomparedtopressuremeasuredwithcommonlyusedtonometersinnormalsubjects AT ambrosiojrrenato biomechanicallycorrectedintraocularpressurecomparedtopressuremeasuredwithcommonlyusedtonometersinnormalsubjects AT maddahnasim biomechanicallycorrectedintraocularpressurecomparedtopressuremeasuredwithcommonlyusedtonometersinnormalsubjects AT daneshzeynab biomechanicallycorrectedintraocularpressurecomparedtopressuremeasuredwithcommonlyusedtonometersinnormalsubjects |