Cargando…

Biomechanically-Corrected Intraocular Pressure Compared To Pressure Measured With Commonly Used Tonometers In Normal Subjects

PURPOSE: To compare the biomechanically-corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) measured by the Corvis ST (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) with IOP measurements made by other commonly used tonometers; and to test the correlations between IOP measures and central corneal thickness. METHODS: One randomly-sele...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sedaghat, Mohammad-Reza, Momeni-Moghaddam, Hamed, Yekta, AbbasAli, Elsheikh, Ahmed, Khabazkhoob, Mehdi, Ambrósio Jr, Renato, Maddah, Nasim, Danesh, Zeynab
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6802558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31802962
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S220776
_version_ 1783460810042900480
author Sedaghat, Mohammad-Reza
Momeni-Moghaddam, Hamed
Yekta, AbbasAli
Elsheikh, Ahmed
Khabazkhoob, Mehdi
Ambrósio Jr, Renato
Maddah, Nasim
Danesh, Zeynab
author_facet Sedaghat, Mohammad-Reza
Momeni-Moghaddam, Hamed
Yekta, AbbasAli
Elsheikh, Ahmed
Khabazkhoob, Mehdi
Ambrósio Jr, Renato
Maddah, Nasim
Danesh, Zeynab
author_sort Sedaghat, Mohammad-Reza
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the biomechanically-corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) measured by the Corvis ST (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) with IOP measurements made by other commonly used tonometers; and to test the correlations between IOP measures and central corneal thickness. METHODS: One randomly-selected eye from each of 94 healthy subjects was assessed. The bIOP was determined by the CorVis ST and compared with the IOP measurements made by standard Goldmann Applanation Tonometer (GAT: Haag-Streit AG, Bern, Switzerland), the Icare (Icare Finland Oy, Vantaa, Finland), and the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA-IOPcc: Reichert, New York, USA). Corneal thickness was assessed by the Oculus Pentacam. The correlation between bIOP and the other devices and between CCT were assessed using the Pearson correlation test or Spearman’s rho test accordingly to the distribution of these values. The Bland-Altman method and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to assess the agreement of bIOP results with IOP obtained with other techniques. The limits of agreement (LoA) were determined as the mean difference ±1.96 SD of the mean differences. In all tests, the significance level was considered to be 0.05. RESULTS: Mean and SD of the bIOP were 16.11±1.66 mmHg. Significant differences were found between the bIOP and other IOP measurements (GAT, 3.02±2.60 mmHg, p<0.001, Icare, 1.51±2.95 mmHg, p<0.001, IOPcc, 1.09±1.96 mmHg, p<0.001). The lowest and highest mean differences in IOP were with the IOPcc and GAT, respectively. Interestingly, there were no significant differences in bIOP, GAT-IOP and ORA-IOPcc between the eyes with thin or thick corneal thicknesses, with Icare-IOP being the only exception (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The Corvis bIOP has a higher correlation with the IOPcc by ORA, which are also compensated for the effects of corneal biomechanics and have less association with corneal thickness relative to the uncorrected GAT and Icare measurements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6802558
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68025582019-12-04 Biomechanically-Corrected Intraocular Pressure Compared To Pressure Measured With Commonly Used Tonometers In Normal Subjects Sedaghat, Mohammad-Reza Momeni-Moghaddam, Hamed Yekta, AbbasAli Elsheikh, Ahmed Khabazkhoob, Mehdi Ambrósio Jr, Renato Maddah, Nasim Danesh, Zeynab Clin Optom (Auckl) Original Research PURPOSE: To compare the biomechanically-corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) measured by the Corvis ST (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) with IOP measurements made by other commonly used tonometers; and to test the correlations between IOP measures and central corneal thickness. METHODS: One randomly-selected eye from each of 94 healthy subjects was assessed. The bIOP was determined by the CorVis ST and compared with the IOP measurements made by standard Goldmann Applanation Tonometer (GAT: Haag-Streit AG, Bern, Switzerland), the Icare (Icare Finland Oy, Vantaa, Finland), and the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA-IOPcc: Reichert, New York, USA). Corneal thickness was assessed by the Oculus Pentacam. The correlation between bIOP and the other devices and between CCT were assessed using the Pearson correlation test or Spearman’s rho test accordingly to the distribution of these values. The Bland-Altman method and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to assess the agreement of bIOP results with IOP obtained with other techniques. The limits of agreement (LoA) were determined as the mean difference ±1.96 SD of the mean differences. In all tests, the significance level was considered to be 0.05. RESULTS: Mean and SD of the bIOP were 16.11±1.66 mmHg. Significant differences were found between the bIOP and other IOP measurements (GAT, 3.02±2.60 mmHg, p<0.001, Icare, 1.51±2.95 mmHg, p<0.001, IOPcc, 1.09±1.96 mmHg, p<0.001). The lowest and highest mean differences in IOP were with the IOPcc and GAT, respectively. Interestingly, there were no significant differences in bIOP, GAT-IOP and ORA-IOPcc between the eyes with thin or thick corneal thicknesses, with Icare-IOP being the only exception (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The Corvis bIOP has a higher correlation with the IOPcc by ORA, which are also compensated for the effects of corneal biomechanics and have less association with corneal thickness relative to the uncorrected GAT and Icare measurements. Dove 2019-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6802558/ /pubmed/31802962 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S220776 Text en © 2019 Sedaghat et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Sedaghat, Mohammad-Reza
Momeni-Moghaddam, Hamed
Yekta, AbbasAli
Elsheikh, Ahmed
Khabazkhoob, Mehdi
Ambrósio Jr, Renato
Maddah, Nasim
Danesh, Zeynab
Biomechanically-Corrected Intraocular Pressure Compared To Pressure Measured With Commonly Used Tonometers In Normal Subjects
title Biomechanically-Corrected Intraocular Pressure Compared To Pressure Measured With Commonly Used Tonometers In Normal Subjects
title_full Biomechanically-Corrected Intraocular Pressure Compared To Pressure Measured With Commonly Used Tonometers In Normal Subjects
title_fullStr Biomechanically-Corrected Intraocular Pressure Compared To Pressure Measured With Commonly Used Tonometers In Normal Subjects
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanically-Corrected Intraocular Pressure Compared To Pressure Measured With Commonly Used Tonometers In Normal Subjects
title_short Biomechanically-Corrected Intraocular Pressure Compared To Pressure Measured With Commonly Used Tonometers In Normal Subjects
title_sort biomechanically-corrected intraocular pressure compared to pressure measured with commonly used tonometers in normal subjects
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6802558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31802962
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S220776
work_keys_str_mv AT sedaghatmohammadreza biomechanicallycorrectedintraocularpressurecomparedtopressuremeasuredwithcommonlyusedtonometersinnormalsubjects
AT momenimoghaddamhamed biomechanicallycorrectedintraocularpressurecomparedtopressuremeasuredwithcommonlyusedtonometersinnormalsubjects
AT yektaabbasali biomechanicallycorrectedintraocularpressurecomparedtopressuremeasuredwithcommonlyusedtonometersinnormalsubjects
AT elsheikhahmed biomechanicallycorrectedintraocularpressurecomparedtopressuremeasuredwithcommonlyusedtonometersinnormalsubjects
AT khabazkhoobmehdi biomechanicallycorrectedintraocularpressurecomparedtopressuremeasuredwithcommonlyusedtonometersinnormalsubjects
AT ambrosiojrrenato biomechanicallycorrectedintraocularpressurecomparedtopressuremeasuredwithcommonlyusedtonometersinnormalsubjects
AT maddahnasim biomechanicallycorrectedintraocularpressurecomparedtopressuremeasuredwithcommonlyusedtonometersinnormalsubjects
AT daneshzeynab biomechanicallycorrectedintraocularpressurecomparedtopressuremeasuredwithcommonlyusedtonometersinnormalsubjects