Cargando…

Attentional Disengagement Deficits Predict Brooding, but Not Reflection, Over a One-Year Period

A growing literature suggests that rumination is linked to attentional disengagement deficits in depression. This is particularly the case with brooding, a maladaptive form of rumination. However, research on the potential constructive association between attentional disengagement and self-reflectio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allard, Eric S., Yaroslavsky, Ilya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6802600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31681088
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02282
_version_ 1783460816450748416
author Allard, Eric S.
Yaroslavsky, Ilya
author_facet Allard, Eric S.
Yaroslavsky, Ilya
author_sort Allard, Eric S.
collection PubMed
description A growing literature suggests that rumination is linked to attentional disengagement deficits in depression. This is particularly the case with brooding, a maladaptive form of rumination. However, research on the potential constructive association between attentional disengagement and self-reflection, a putative adaptive form of rumination, is sparse. Thus, the goal of the present study was to examine whether visual attentional disengagement deficits differentially predict dispositional brooding and self-reflection tendencies. Depressed participants (n = 17), those in remission from depression (n = 42), and their peers with no depression histories (n = 70) completed clinical interviews, the Ruminative Response Scale (RRS), and an eye-tracking task that measured attentional disengagement from pleasant (happy) and unpleasant (sad) facial images during a laboratory visit, and the RRS at 4 month intervals over a 1-year period. Results revealed that slow disengagement from sad faces, and rapid disengagement from happy faces, was specifically associated with brooding tendencies concurrently and across follow-up. Attentional disengagement was unrelated to self-reflection. The disengagement-brooding associations remained after controlling for depression status and anxiety disorder histories, suggesting that attentional control deficits may be a state-independent marker of brooding. Theoretical and clinical implications for these associations are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6802600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68026002019-11-01 Attentional Disengagement Deficits Predict Brooding, but Not Reflection, Over a One-Year Period Allard, Eric S. Yaroslavsky, Ilya Front Psychol Psychology A growing literature suggests that rumination is linked to attentional disengagement deficits in depression. This is particularly the case with brooding, a maladaptive form of rumination. However, research on the potential constructive association between attentional disengagement and self-reflection, a putative adaptive form of rumination, is sparse. Thus, the goal of the present study was to examine whether visual attentional disengagement deficits differentially predict dispositional brooding and self-reflection tendencies. Depressed participants (n = 17), those in remission from depression (n = 42), and their peers with no depression histories (n = 70) completed clinical interviews, the Ruminative Response Scale (RRS), and an eye-tracking task that measured attentional disengagement from pleasant (happy) and unpleasant (sad) facial images during a laboratory visit, and the RRS at 4 month intervals over a 1-year period. Results revealed that slow disengagement from sad faces, and rapid disengagement from happy faces, was specifically associated with brooding tendencies concurrently and across follow-up. Attentional disengagement was unrelated to self-reflection. The disengagement-brooding associations remained after controlling for depression status and anxiety disorder histories, suggesting that attentional control deficits may be a state-independent marker of brooding. Theoretical and clinical implications for these associations are discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6802600/ /pubmed/31681088 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02282 Text en Copyright © 2019 Allard and Yaroslavsky. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Allard, Eric S.
Yaroslavsky, Ilya
Attentional Disengagement Deficits Predict Brooding, but Not Reflection, Over a One-Year Period
title Attentional Disengagement Deficits Predict Brooding, but Not Reflection, Over a One-Year Period
title_full Attentional Disengagement Deficits Predict Brooding, but Not Reflection, Over a One-Year Period
title_fullStr Attentional Disengagement Deficits Predict Brooding, but Not Reflection, Over a One-Year Period
title_full_unstemmed Attentional Disengagement Deficits Predict Brooding, but Not Reflection, Over a One-Year Period
title_short Attentional Disengagement Deficits Predict Brooding, but Not Reflection, Over a One-Year Period
title_sort attentional disengagement deficits predict brooding, but not reflection, over a one-year period
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6802600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31681088
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02282
work_keys_str_mv AT allarderics attentionaldisengagementdeficitspredictbroodingbutnotreflectionoveraoneyearperiod
AT yaroslavskyilya attentionaldisengagementdeficitspredictbroodingbutnotreflectionoveraoneyearperiod