Cargando…

The A-Effect and Global Motion

When the head is tilted, an objectively vertical line viewed in isolation is typically perceived as tilted. We explored whether this shift also occurs when viewing global motion displays perceived as either object-motion or self-motion. Observers stood and lay left side down while viewing (1) a stat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guterman, Pearl S., Allison, Robert S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6802772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31735814
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision3020013
_version_ 1783460852711555072
author Guterman, Pearl S.
Allison, Robert S.
author_facet Guterman, Pearl S.
Allison, Robert S.
author_sort Guterman, Pearl S.
collection PubMed
description When the head is tilted, an objectively vertical line viewed in isolation is typically perceived as tilted. We explored whether this shift also occurs when viewing global motion displays perceived as either object-motion or self-motion. Observers stood and lay left side down while viewing (1) a static line, (2) a random-dot display of 2-D (planar) motion or (3) a random-dot display of 3-D (volumetric) global motion. On each trial, the line orientation or motion direction were tilted from the gravitational vertical and observers indicated whether the tilt was clockwise or counter-clockwise from the perceived vertical. Psychometric functions were fit to the data and shifts in the point of subjective verticality (PSV) were measured. When the whole body was tilted, the perceived tilt of both a static line and the direction of optic flow were biased in the direction of the body tilt, demonstrating the so-called A-effect. However, we found significantly larger shifts for the static line than volumetric global motion as well as larger shifts for volumetric displays than planar displays. The A-effect was larger when the motion was experienced as self-motion compared to when it was experienced as object-motion. Discrimination thresholds were also more precise in the self-motion compared to object-motion conditions. Different magnitude A-effects for the line and motion conditions—and for object and self-motion—may be due to differences in combining of idiotropic (body) and vestibular signals, particularly so in the case of vection which occurs despite visual-vestibular conflict.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6802772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68027722019-11-14 The A-Effect and Global Motion Guterman, Pearl S. Allison, Robert S. Vision (Basel) Article When the head is tilted, an objectively vertical line viewed in isolation is typically perceived as tilted. We explored whether this shift also occurs when viewing global motion displays perceived as either object-motion or self-motion. Observers stood and lay left side down while viewing (1) a static line, (2) a random-dot display of 2-D (planar) motion or (3) a random-dot display of 3-D (volumetric) global motion. On each trial, the line orientation or motion direction were tilted from the gravitational vertical and observers indicated whether the tilt was clockwise or counter-clockwise from the perceived vertical. Psychometric functions were fit to the data and shifts in the point of subjective verticality (PSV) were measured. When the whole body was tilted, the perceived tilt of both a static line and the direction of optic flow were biased in the direction of the body tilt, demonstrating the so-called A-effect. However, we found significantly larger shifts for the static line than volumetric global motion as well as larger shifts for volumetric displays than planar displays. The A-effect was larger when the motion was experienced as self-motion compared to when it was experienced as object-motion. Discrimination thresholds were also more precise in the self-motion compared to object-motion conditions. Different magnitude A-effects for the line and motion conditions—and for object and self-motion—may be due to differences in combining of idiotropic (body) and vestibular signals, particularly so in the case of vection which occurs despite visual-vestibular conflict. MDPI 2019-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6802772/ /pubmed/31735814 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision3020013 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Guterman, Pearl S.
Allison, Robert S.
The A-Effect and Global Motion
title The A-Effect and Global Motion
title_full The A-Effect and Global Motion
title_fullStr The A-Effect and Global Motion
title_full_unstemmed The A-Effect and Global Motion
title_short The A-Effect and Global Motion
title_sort a-effect and global motion
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6802772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31735814
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision3020013
work_keys_str_mv AT gutermanpearls theaeffectandglobalmotion
AT allisonroberts theaeffectandglobalmotion
AT gutermanpearls aeffectandglobalmotion
AT allisonroberts aeffectandglobalmotion