Cargando…

Task-Irrelevant Features in Visual Working Memory Influence Covert Attention: Evidence from a Partial Report Task

Selecting a target based on a representation in visual working memory (VWM) affords biasing covert attention towards objects with memory-matching features. Recently, we showed that even task-irrelevant features of a VWM template bias attention. Specifically, when participants had to saccade to a cue...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foerster, Rebecca M., Schneider, Werner X.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6802802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31735843
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision3030042
_version_ 1783460860342042624
author Foerster, Rebecca M.
Schneider, Werner X.
author_facet Foerster, Rebecca M.
Schneider, Werner X.
author_sort Foerster, Rebecca M.
collection PubMed
description Selecting a target based on a representation in visual working memory (VWM) affords biasing covert attention towards objects with memory-matching features. Recently, we showed that even task-irrelevant features of a VWM template bias attention. Specifically, when participants had to saccade to a cued shape, distractors sharing the cue’s search-irrelevant color captured the eyes. While a saccade always aims at one target location, multiple locations can be attended covertly. Here, we investigated whether covert attention is captured similarly as the eyes. In our partial report task, each trial started with a shape-defined search cue, followed by a fixation cross. Next, two colored shapes, each including a letter, appeared left and right from fixation, followed by masks. The letter inside that shape matching the preceding cue had to be reported. In Experiment 1, either target, distractor, both, or no object matched the cue’s irrelevant color. Target-letter reports were most frequent in target-match trials and least frequent in distractor-match trials. Irrelevant cue and target color never matched in Experiment 2. Still, participants reported the distractor more often to the target’s disadvantage, when cue and distractor color matched. Thus, irrelevant features of a VWM template can influence covert attention in an involuntarily object-based manner when searching for trial-wise varying targets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6802802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68028022019-11-14 Task-Irrelevant Features in Visual Working Memory Influence Covert Attention: Evidence from a Partial Report Task Foerster, Rebecca M. Schneider, Werner X. Vision (Basel) Article Selecting a target based on a representation in visual working memory (VWM) affords biasing covert attention towards objects with memory-matching features. Recently, we showed that even task-irrelevant features of a VWM template bias attention. Specifically, when participants had to saccade to a cued shape, distractors sharing the cue’s search-irrelevant color captured the eyes. While a saccade always aims at one target location, multiple locations can be attended covertly. Here, we investigated whether covert attention is captured similarly as the eyes. In our partial report task, each trial started with a shape-defined search cue, followed by a fixation cross. Next, two colored shapes, each including a letter, appeared left and right from fixation, followed by masks. The letter inside that shape matching the preceding cue had to be reported. In Experiment 1, either target, distractor, both, or no object matched the cue’s irrelevant color. Target-letter reports were most frequent in target-match trials and least frequent in distractor-match trials. Irrelevant cue and target color never matched in Experiment 2. Still, participants reported the distractor more often to the target’s disadvantage, when cue and distractor color matched. Thus, irrelevant features of a VWM template can influence covert attention in an involuntarily object-based manner when searching for trial-wise varying targets. MDPI 2019-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6802802/ /pubmed/31735843 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision3030042 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Foerster, Rebecca M.
Schneider, Werner X.
Task-Irrelevant Features in Visual Working Memory Influence Covert Attention: Evidence from a Partial Report Task
title Task-Irrelevant Features in Visual Working Memory Influence Covert Attention: Evidence from a Partial Report Task
title_full Task-Irrelevant Features in Visual Working Memory Influence Covert Attention: Evidence from a Partial Report Task
title_fullStr Task-Irrelevant Features in Visual Working Memory Influence Covert Attention: Evidence from a Partial Report Task
title_full_unstemmed Task-Irrelevant Features in Visual Working Memory Influence Covert Attention: Evidence from a Partial Report Task
title_short Task-Irrelevant Features in Visual Working Memory Influence Covert Attention: Evidence from a Partial Report Task
title_sort task-irrelevant features in visual working memory influence covert attention: evidence from a partial report task
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6802802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31735843
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision3030042
work_keys_str_mv AT foersterrebeccam taskirrelevantfeaturesinvisualworkingmemoryinfluencecovertattentionevidencefromapartialreporttask
AT schneiderwernerx taskirrelevantfeaturesinvisualworkingmemoryinfluencecovertattentionevidencefromapartialreporttask