Cargando…

Considerations of target surface area and the risk of radiosurgical toxicity

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to explore conceptual benefits of characterizing delineated target volumes based on surface area and to utilize the concept for assessing risk of therapeutic toxicity in radiosurgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Four computer-generated targets, a sphere, a cylinder,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stojadinovic, Strahinja, Yan, Yulong, Leiker, Andrew, Ahn, Chul, Wardak, Zabi, Dan, Tu, Nedzi, Lucien, Timmerman, Robert, Patel, Toral, Barnett, Samuel, Mickey, Bruce, Meyer, Jeffrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6802845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31634366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224047
_version_ 1783460871208435712
author Stojadinovic, Strahinja
Yan, Yulong
Leiker, Andrew
Ahn, Chul
Wardak, Zabi
Dan, Tu
Nedzi, Lucien
Timmerman, Robert
Patel, Toral
Barnett, Samuel
Mickey, Bruce
Meyer, Jeffrey
author_facet Stojadinovic, Strahinja
Yan, Yulong
Leiker, Andrew
Ahn, Chul
Wardak, Zabi
Dan, Tu
Nedzi, Lucien
Timmerman, Robert
Patel, Toral
Barnett, Samuel
Mickey, Bruce
Meyer, Jeffrey
author_sort Stojadinovic, Strahinja
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to explore conceptual benefits of characterizing delineated target volumes based on surface area and to utilize the concept for assessing risk of therapeutic toxicity in radiosurgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Four computer-generated targets, a sphere, a cylinder, an ellipsoid and a box, were designed for two distinct scenarios. In the first scenario, all targets had identical volumes, and in the second one, all targets had identical surface areas. High quality stereotactic radiosurgery plans with at least 95% target coverage and selectivity were created for each target in both scenarios. Normal brain volumes V(12Gy), V(14Gy) and V(16Gy) corresponding to received dose of 12 Gy, 14 Gy and 16 Gy, respectively, were computed and analyzed. Additionally, V(12Gy) and V(14Gy) volumes and values for seven prospective toxicity variables were recorded for 100 meningioma patients after Gamma Knife radiosurgery. Multivariable stepwise linear regression and best subset linear regression analyses were performed in two statistical software packages, SAS/STAT and R, respectively. RESULTS: In a phantom study, for the constant volume targets, the volumes of 12 Gy, 14 Gy and 16 Gy isodose clouds were the lowest for the spherical target as an expected corollary of the isoperimetric inequality. For the constant surface area targets, a conventional wisdom is confirmed, as the target volume increases the corresponding volumes V(12Gy), V(14Gy) and V(16Gy) also increase. In the 100-meningioma patient cohort, the best univariate model featured tumor surface area as the most significantly associated variable with both V(12Gy) and V(14Gy) volumes, corresponding to the adjusted R(2) values of 0.82 and 0.77, respectively. Two statistical methods converged to matching multivariable models. CONCLUSIONS: In a univariate model, target surface area is a better predictor of spilled dose to normal tissue than target largest dimension or target volume itself. In complex multivariate models, target surface area is an independent variable for modeling radiosurgical normal tissue toxicity risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6802845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68028452019-11-02 Considerations of target surface area and the risk of radiosurgical toxicity Stojadinovic, Strahinja Yan, Yulong Leiker, Andrew Ahn, Chul Wardak, Zabi Dan, Tu Nedzi, Lucien Timmerman, Robert Patel, Toral Barnett, Samuel Mickey, Bruce Meyer, Jeffrey PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to explore conceptual benefits of characterizing delineated target volumes based on surface area and to utilize the concept for assessing risk of therapeutic toxicity in radiosurgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Four computer-generated targets, a sphere, a cylinder, an ellipsoid and a box, were designed for two distinct scenarios. In the first scenario, all targets had identical volumes, and in the second one, all targets had identical surface areas. High quality stereotactic radiosurgery plans with at least 95% target coverage and selectivity were created for each target in both scenarios. Normal brain volumes V(12Gy), V(14Gy) and V(16Gy) corresponding to received dose of 12 Gy, 14 Gy and 16 Gy, respectively, were computed and analyzed. Additionally, V(12Gy) and V(14Gy) volumes and values for seven prospective toxicity variables were recorded for 100 meningioma patients after Gamma Knife radiosurgery. Multivariable stepwise linear regression and best subset linear regression analyses were performed in two statistical software packages, SAS/STAT and R, respectively. RESULTS: In a phantom study, for the constant volume targets, the volumes of 12 Gy, 14 Gy and 16 Gy isodose clouds were the lowest for the spherical target as an expected corollary of the isoperimetric inequality. For the constant surface area targets, a conventional wisdom is confirmed, as the target volume increases the corresponding volumes V(12Gy), V(14Gy) and V(16Gy) also increase. In the 100-meningioma patient cohort, the best univariate model featured tumor surface area as the most significantly associated variable with both V(12Gy) and V(14Gy) volumes, corresponding to the adjusted R(2) values of 0.82 and 0.77, respectively. Two statistical methods converged to matching multivariable models. CONCLUSIONS: In a univariate model, target surface area is a better predictor of spilled dose to normal tissue than target largest dimension or target volume itself. In complex multivariate models, target surface area is an independent variable for modeling radiosurgical normal tissue toxicity risk. Public Library of Science 2019-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6802845/ /pubmed/31634366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224047 Text en © 2019 Stojadinovic et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stojadinovic, Strahinja
Yan, Yulong
Leiker, Andrew
Ahn, Chul
Wardak, Zabi
Dan, Tu
Nedzi, Lucien
Timmerman, Robert
Patel, Toral
Barnett, Samuel
Mickey, Bruce
Meyer, Jeffrey
Considerations of target surface area and the risk of radiosurgical toxicity
title Considerations of target surface area and the risk of radiosurgical toxicity
title_full Considerations of target surface area and the risk of radiosurgical toxicity
title_fullStr Considerations of target surface area and the risk of radiosurgical toxicity
title_full_unstemmed Considerations of target surface area and the risk of radiosurgical toxicity
title_short Considerations of target surface area and the risk of radiosurgical toxicity
title_sort considerations of target surface area and the risk of radiosurgical toxicity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6802845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31634366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224047
work_keys_str_mv AT stojadinovicstrahinja considerationsoftargetsurfaceareaandtheriskofradiosurgicaltoxicity
AT yanyulong considerationsoftargetsurfaceareaandtheriskofradiosurgicaltoxicity
AT leikerandrew considerationsoftargetsurfaceareaandtheriskofradiosurgicaltoxicity
AT ahnchul considerationsoftargetsurfaceareaandtheriskofradiosurgicaltoxicity
AT wardakzabi considerationsoftargetsurfaceareaandtheriskofradiosurgicaltoxicity
AT dantu considerationsoftargetsurfaceareaandtheriskofradiosurgicaltoxicity
AT nedzilucien considerationsoftargetsurfaceareaandtheriskofradiosurgicaltoxicity
AT timmermanrobert considerationsoftargetsurfaceareaandtheriskofradiosurgicaltoxicity
AT pateltoral considerationsoftargetsurfaceareaandtheriskofradiosurgicaltoxicity
AT barnettsamuel considerationsoftargetsurfaceareaandtheriskofradiosurgicaltoxicity
AT mickeybruce considerationsoftargetsurfaceareaandtheriskofradiosurgicaltoxicity
AT meyerjeffrey considerationsoftargetsurfaceareaandtheriskofradiosurgicaltoxicity