Cargando…

Communicative Strengths in Severe Aphasia: The Famous People Protocol and Its Value in Planning Treatment

PURPOSE: This clinical focus article describes the development and use of the Famous People Protocol (FPP), a clinical tool for observing the strategies people with severe aphasia (PWSA) can use to communicate when speech is limited. Its goal is to provide a systematic approach to identifying indivi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holland, Audrey, Forbes, Margaret, Fromm, Davida, MacWhinney, Brian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6802917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31120767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0283
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: This clinical focus article describes the development and use of the Famous People Protocol (FPP), a clinical tool for observing the strategies people with severe aphasia (PWSA) can use to communicate when speech is limited. Its goal is to provide a systematic approach to identifying individually appropriate communication strategies for PWSA. METHOD: Though not a test, the FPP's development and pilot testing were consonant with qualitative approaches to test development. Eighty-one people with aphasia and 37 nonaphasic participants were given the current version of FPP and the Western Aphasia Battery–Revised (WAB-R; Kertesz, 2006). This clinical focus article reports on the 36 PWA who scored near or below the mean WAB score of the larger group. RESULTS: The FPP has a maximum score of 100 based on (a) identification of famous people in different categories, entertainers, athletes, U.S. presidents, sports figures, and internationally famous people, and (b) responses to additional questions about the famous people. Identification is scored quantitatively on a 3-point scale, and question responses are scored correct (1) or incorrect (0). Mean scores for the PWSA and control groups were 54.6 and 95.2, respectively. FPP and WAB-R scores were moderately correlated (r = .67). Qualitative results describe the variety of strategies that PWSA used on the FPP. CONCLUSIONS: The FPP is a way for clinicians to engage PWSA in an activity that can reveal personally relevant strategies to help PWSA communicate more effectively. The strategies can then become the basis for subsequent training on using them conversationally. Appendixes provide examples of clinical approaches.