Cargando…

Primary care integration of sexual and reproductive health services for chlamydia testing across WHO-Europe: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To identify current uptake of chlamydia testing (UCT) as a sexual and reproductive health service (SRHS) integrated in primary care settings of the WHO European region, with the aim to shape policy and quality of care. DESIGN: Systematic review for studies published from January 2001 to M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quezada-Yamamoto, Harumi, Dubois, Elizabeth, Mastellos, Nikolaos, Rawaf, Salman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6803110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31628129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031644
_version_ 1783460899877552128
author Quezada-Yamamoto, Harumi
Dubois, Elizabeth
Mastellos, Nikolaos
Rawaf, Salman
author_facet Quezada-Yamamoto, Harumi
Dubois, Elizabeth
Mastellos, Nikolaos
Rawaf, Salman
author_sort Quezada-Yamamoto, Harumi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To identify current uptake of chlamydia testing (UCT) as a sexual and reproductive health service (SRHS) integrated in primary care settings of the WHO European region, with the aim to shape policy and quality of care. DESIGN: Systematic review for studies published from January 2001 to May 2018 in any European language. DATA SOURCES: OVID Medline, EMBASE, Maternal and Infant Care and Global Health. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Published studies, which involved women or men, adolescents or adults, reporting a UCT indicator in a primary care within a WHO European region country. Study designs considered were: randomised control trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental, observational (eg, cohort, case–control, cross-sectional) and mixed-methods studies as well as case reports. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers screened the sources and validated the selection process. The BRIGGS Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies, the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool 2011 and Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklists were considered for quality and risk of bias assessment. RESULTS: 24 studies were finally included, of which 15 were cross-sectional, 4 cohort, 2 RCTs, 2 case–control studies and 1 mixed-methods study. A majority of the evidence cites the UK model, followed by the Netherlands, Denmark, Norway and Belgium only. Acceptability if offered test in primary healthcare (PHC) ranged from 55% to 81.4% in women and from 9.5% to 70.6% when both genders were reported together. Men may have a lower UCT compared with women. When both genders were reported together, the lowest acceptability was 9.5% in the Netherlands. Denmark presented the highest percentage of eligible people who tested in a PHC setting (87.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Different health systems may influence UCT in PHC. The regional use of a common testing rate indicator is suggested to homogenise reporting. There is very little evidence on integration of SRHS such as chlamydia testing in PHC and there are gaps between European countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6803110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68031102019-10-31 Primary care integration of sexual and reproductive health services for chlamydia testing across WHO-Europe: a systematic review Quezada-Yamamoto, Harumi Dubois, Elizabeth Mastellos, Nikolaos Rawaf, Salman BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVE: To identify current uptake of chlamydia testing (UCT) as a sexual and reproductive health service (SRHS) integrated in primary care settings of the WHO European region, with the aim to shape policy and quality of care. DESIGN: Systematic review for studies published from January 2001 to May 2018 in any European language. DATA SOURCES: OVID Medline, EMBASE, Maternal and Infant Care and Global Health. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Published studies, which involved women or men, adolescents or adults, reporting a UCT indicator in a primary care within a WHO European region country. Study designs considered were: randomised control trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental, observational (eg, cohort, case–control, cross-sectional) and mixed-methods studies as well as case reports. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers screened the sources and validated the selection process. The BRIGGS Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies, the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool 2011 and Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklists were considered for quality and risk of bias assessment. RESULTS: 24 studies were finally included, of which 15 were cross-sectional, 4 cohort, 2 RCTs, 2 case–control studies and 1 mixed-methods study. A majority of the evidence cites the UK model, followed by the Netherlands, Denmark, Norway and Belgium only. Acceptability if offered test in primary healthcare (PHC) ranged from 55% to 81.4% in women and from 9.5% to 70.6% when both genders were reported together. Men may have a lower UCT compared with women. When both genders were reported together, the lowest acceptability was 9.5% in the Netherlands. Denmark presented the highest percentage of eligible people who tested in a PHC setting (87.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Different health systems may influence UCT in PHC. The regional use of a common testing rate indicator is suggested to homogenise reporting. There is very little evidence on integration of SRHS such as chlamydia testing in PHC and there are gaps between European countries. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6803110/ /pubmed/31628129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031644 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Quezada-Yamamoto, Harumi
Dubois, Elizabeth
Mastellos, Nikolaos
Rawaf, Salman
Primary care integration of sexual and reproductive health services for chlamydia testing across WHO-Europe: a systematic review
title Primary care integration of sexual and reproductive health services for chlamydia testing across WHO-Europe: a systematic review
title_full Primary care integration of sexual and reproductive health services for chlamydia testing across WHO-Europe: a systematic review
title_fullStr Primary care integration of sexual and reproductive health services for chlamydia testing across WHO-Europe: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Primary care integration of sexual and reproductive health services for chlamydia testing across WHO-Europe: a systematic review
title_short Primary care integration of sexual and reproductive health services for chlamydia testing across WHO-Europe: a systematic review
title_sort primary care integration of sexual and reproductive health services for chlamydia testing across who-europe: a systematic review
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6803110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31628129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031644
work_keys_str_mv AT quezadayamamotoharumi primarycareintegrationofsexualandreproductivehealthservicesforchlamydiatestingacrosswhoeuropeasystematicreview
AT duboiselizabeth primarycareintegrationofsexualandreproductivehealthservicesforchlamydiatestingacrosswhoeuropeasystematicreview
AT mastellosnikolaos primarycareintegrationofsexualandreproductivehealthservicesforchlamydiatestingacrosswhoeuropeasystematicreview
AT rawafsalman primarycareintegrationofsexualandreproductivehealthservicesforchlamydiatestingacrosswhoeuropeasystematicreview