Cargando…
Examining the information needed for acceptance of deintensified screening programmes: qualitative focus groups about cervical screening in Australia
OBJECTIVES: Given the changing understanding of overdiagnosis of screen detected cancers and advances in technology to detect and prevent cancer, updating and scaling back cancer screening programmes is becoming increasingly necessary. The National Cervical Screening Programme (NCSP) in Australia wa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6803149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31630103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029319 |
_version_ | 1783460904850948096 |
---|---|
author | Dodd, Rachael H Nickel, Brooke Wortley, Sally Bonner, Carissa Hersch, Jolyn McCaffery, Kirsten J |
author_facet | Dodd, Rachael H Nickel, Brooke Wortley, Sally Bonner, Carissa Hersch, Jolyn McCaffery, Kirsten J |
author_sort | Dodd, Rachael H |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Given the changing understanding of overdiagnosis of screen detected cancers and advances in technology to detect and prevent cancer, updating and scaling back cancer screening programmes is becoming increasingly necessary. The National Cervical Screening Programme (NCSP) in Australia was recently deintensified, with the changes implemented in December 2017. This study examines women’s understanding and acceptance of the renewed screening protocol and how such changes can be communicated more effectively. DESIGN: Focus groups structured around a presentation of information about the renewed NCSP, with discussions of the information facilitated throughout. Qualitative data analysis was conducted. SETTING: Australia PARTICIPANTS: Six focus groups were conducted in November 2017 with a community sample of 49 women aged 18–74. RESULTS: Women demonstrated little or no awareness of the upcoming screening changes in the period just before they occurred. Women expressed most concern and fear that the increased screening interval (from 2 to 5 years) and later age of first screening (from age 18 to 25 years) could lead to missing cancers. Concerns about exit testing were less common. Understanding of the natural history and the prevalence of both human papillomavirus and cervical cancer, and the nature of the new test (catching it ‘earlier’) was key to alleviate concerns about the increased screening interval. CONCLUSIONS: Deintensifying screening programmes should be accompanied by clear and coherent communication of the changes, including the rationale behind them, to limit concerns from the public and facilitate acceptance of renewed programmes. In this case, understanding the biology of cervical cancer was crucial. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6803149 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68031492019-10-31 Examining the information needed for acceptance of deintensified screening programmes: qualitative focus groups about cervical screening in Australia Dodd, Rachael H Nickel, Brooke Wortley, Sally Bonner, Carissa Hersch, Jolyn McCaffery, Kirsten J BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: Given the changing understanding of overdiagnosis of screen detected cancers and advances in technology to detect and prevent cancer, updating and scaling back cancer screening programmes is becoming increasingly necessary. The National Cervical Screening Programme (NCSP) in Australia was recently deintensified, with the changes implemented in December 2017. This study examines women’s understanding and acceptance of the renewed screening protocol and how such changes can be communicated more effectively. DESIGN: Focus groups structured around a presentation of information about the renewed NCSP, with discussions of the information facilitated throughout. Qualitative data analysis was conducted. SETTING: Australia PARTICIPANTS: Six focus groups were conducted in November 2017 with a community sample of 49 women aged 18–74. RESULTS: Women demonstrated little or no awareness of the upcoming screening changes in the period just before they occurred. Women expressed most concern and fear that the increased screening interval (from 2 to 5 years) and later age of first screening (from age 18 to 25 years) could lead to missing cancers. Concerns about exit testing were less common. Understanding of the natural history and the prevalence of both human papillomavirus and cervical cancer, and the nature of the new test (catching it ‘earlier’) was key to alleviate concerns about the increased screening interval. CONCLUSIONS: Deintensifying screening programmes should be accompanied by clear and coherent communication of the changes, including the rationale behind them, to limit concerns from the public and facilitate acceptance of renewed programmes. In this case, understanding the biology of cervical cancer was crucial. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6803149/ /pubmed/31630103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029319 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Dodd, Rachael H Nickel, Brooke Wortley, Sally Bonner, Carissa Hersch, Jolyn McCaffery, Kirsten J Examining the information needed for acceptance of deintensified screening programmes: qualitative focus groups about cervical screening in Australia |
title | Examining the information needed for acceptance of deintensified screening programmes: qualitative focus groups about cervical screening in Australia |
title_full | Examining the information needed for acceptance of deintensified screening programmes: qualitative focus groups about cervical screening in Australia |
title_fullStr | Examining the information needed for acceptance of deintensified screening programmes: qualitative focus groups about cervical screening in Australia |
title_full_unstemmed | Examining the information needed for acceptance of deintensified screening programmes: qualitative focus groups about cervical screening in Australia |
title_short | Examining the information needed for acceptance of deintensified screening programmes: qualitative focus groups about cervical screening in Australia |
title_sort | examining the information needed for acceptance of deintensified screening programmes: qualitative focus groups about cervical screening in australia |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6803149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31630103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029319 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT doddrachaelh examiningtheinformationneededforacceptanceofdeintensifiedscreeningprogrammesqualitativefocusgroupsaboutcervicalscreeninginaustralia AT nickelbrooke examiningtheinformationneededforacceptanceofdeintensifiedscreeningprogrammesqualitativefocusgroupsaboutcervicalscreeninginaustralia AT wortleysally examiningtheinformationneededforacceptanceofdeintensifiedscreeningprogrammesqualitativefocusgroupsaboutcervicalscreeninginaustralia AT bonnercarissa examiningtheinformationneededforacceptanceofdeintensifiedscreeningprogrammesqualitativefocusgroupsaboutcervicalscreeninginaustralia AT herschjolyn examiningtheinformationneededforacceptanceofdeintensifiedscreeningprogrammesqualitativefocusgroupsaboutcervicalscreeninginaustralia AT mccafferykirstenj examiningtheinformationneededforacceptanceofdeintensifiedscreeningprogrammesqualitativefocusgroupsaboutcervicalscreeninginaustralia |