Cargando…

Assessing decision regret in caregivers of deceased German people with cancer—A psychometric validation of the Decision Regret Scale for Caregivers

BACKGROUND: Decisional regret during or after medical treatments is linked to significant distress. Regret affects not only patients but also caregivers having an active or passive role during decision making. The Decision Regret Scale (DRS) is a self‐report measure for regret in patients after trea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haun, Markus W., Schakowski, Alexander, Preibsch, Ariane, Friederich, Hans‐Christoph, Hartmann, Mechthild
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6803409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31368210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12941
_version_ 1783460923736850432
author Haun, Markus W.
Schakowski, Alexander
Preibsch, Ariane
Friederich, Hans‐Christoph
Hartmann, Mechthild
author_facet Haun, Markus W.
Schakowski, Alexander
Preibsch, Ariane
Friederich, Hans‐Christoph
Hartmann, Mechthild
author_sort Haun, Markus W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Decisional regret during or after medical treatments is linked to significant distress. Regret affects not only patients but also caregivers having an active or passive role during decision making. The Decision Regret Scale (DRS) is a self‐report measure for regret in patients after treatment decisions. However, practical and psychometrically robust instruments assessing regret in caregivers are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a caregiver version of the DRS (Decision Regret Scale for Caregivers [DRS‐C]). DESIGN: Psychometric validation based on a web survey. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 361 caregivers of deceased German people/patients with cancer. MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED: Besides structural validity and test‐retest reliability, we evaluated measurement invariance accounting for gender, age and closeness of relationship, and tested hypotheses on convergent/discriminant validity. RESULTS: Forty‐five per cent of all caregivers demonstrated decision regret. Confirmatory factor analyses strongly supported the unidimensional structure of the DRS‐C and pointed to strict invariance. The DRS‐C demonstrated very good internal consistency (α = 0.83, 95% CI [0.81, 0.86]) and test‐retest reliability (ICC [A,1] = 0.73, 95% CI [0.59, 0.83]) along with sound convergent/discriminant validity. Concerning responsiveness, DRS‐C scores remained stable over a 12‐week period in 83.3% of all caregivers. Receiver operating characteristic analysis yielded a cut point of 43 for the identification of significant decision regret (AUC = 0.62, 95% CI [0.56, 0.68]). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The lack of a gold standard instrument prevented us from examining the criterion validity and determining a minimally important difference. Nevertheless, the DRS‐C provides valid and reliable information regarding caregiver regret following medical decisions. Above all, it captures a crucial aspect of the treatment experience in caregivers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6803409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68034092019-10-24 Assessing decision regret in caregivers of deceased German people with cancer—A psychometric validation of the Decision Regret Scale for Caregivers Haun, Markus W. Schakowski, Alexander Preibsch, Ariane Friederich, Hans‐Christoph Hartmann, Mechthild Health Expect Original Research Papers BACKGROUND: Decisional regret during or after medical treatments is linked to significant distress. Regret affects not only patients but also caregivers having an active or passive role during decision making. The Decision Regret Scale (DRS) is a self‐report measure for regret in patients after treatment decisions. However, practical and psychometrically robust instruments assessing regret in caregivers are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a caregiver version of the DRS (Decision Regret Scale for Caregivers [DRS‐C]). DESIGN: Psychometric validation based on a web survey. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 361 caregivers of deceased German people/patients with cancer. MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED: Besides structural validity and test‐retest reliability, we evaluated measurement invariance accounting for gender, age and closeness of relationship, and tested hypotheses on convergent/discriminant validity. RESULTS: Forty‐five per cent of all caregivers demonstrated decision regret. Confirmatory factor analyses strongly supported the unidimensional structure of the DRS‐C and pointed to strict invariance. The DRS‐C demonstrated very good internal consistency (α = 0.83, 95% CI [0.81, 0.86]) and test‐retest reliability (ICC [A,1] = 0.73, 95% CI [0.59, 0.83]) along with sound convergent/discriminant validity. Concerning responsiveness, DRS‐C scores remained stable over a 12‐week period in 83.3% of all caregivers. Receiver operating characteristic analysis yielded a cut point of 43 for the identification of significant decision regret (AUC = 0.62, 95% CI [0.56, 0.68]). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The lack of a gold standard instrument prevented us from examining the criterion validity and determining a minimally important difference. Nevertheless, the DRS‐C provides valid and reliable information regarding caregiver regret following medical decisions. Above all, it captures a crucial aspect of the treatment experience in caregivers. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-31 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6803409/ /pubmed/31368210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12941 Text en © 2019 The Authors Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Papers
Haun, Markus W.
Schakowski, Alexander
Preibsch, Ariane
Friederich, Hans‐Christoph
Hartmann, Mechthild
Assessing decision regret in caregivers of deceased German people with cancer—A psychometric validation of the Decision Regret Scale for Caregivers
title Assessing decision regret in caregivers of deceased German people with cancer—A psychometric validation of the Decision Regret Scale for Caregivers
title_full Assessing decision regret in caregivers of deceased German people with cancer—A psychometric validation of the Decision Regret Scale for Caregivers
title_fullStr Assessing decision regret in caregivers of deceased German people with cancer—A psychometric validation of the Decision Regret Scale for Caregivers
title_full_unstemmed Assessing decision regret in caregivers of deceased German people with cancer—A psychometric validation of the Decision Regret Scale for Caregivers
title_short Assessing decision regret in caregivers of deceased German people with cancer—A psychometric validation of the Decision Regret Scale for Caregivers
title_sort assessing decision regret in caregivers of deceased german people with cancer—a psychometric validation of the decision regret scale for caregivers
topic Original Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6803409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31368210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12941
work_keys_str_mv AT haunmarkusw assessingdecisionregretincaregiversofdeceasedgermanpeoplewithcancerapsychometricvalidationofthedecisionregretscaleforcaregivers
AT schakowskialexander assessingdecisionregretincaregiversofdeceasedgermanpeoplewithcancerapsychometricvalidationofthedecisionregretscaleforcaregivers
AT preibschariane assessingdecisionregretincaregiversofdeceasedgermanpeoplewithcancerapsychometricvalidationofthedecisionregretscaleforcaregivers
AT friederichhanschristoph assessingdecisionregretincaregiversofdeceasedgermanpeoplewithcancerapsychometricvalidationofthedecisionregretscaleforcaregivers
AT hartmannmechthild assessingdecisionregretincaregiversofdeceasedgermanpeoplewithcancerapsychometricvalidationofthedecisionregretscaleforcaregivers