Cargando…

Central Venous Pressure (CVP) Reduction Associated With Higher Cardiac Output (CO) Favors Good Prognosis of Circulatory Shock: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: The Frank-Starling curve is the basis of hemodynamics. Changes in cardiac output (CO) caused by central venous pressure (CVP) are the most important concerns in the treatment of critically ill patients. Objectives: To explore the use of CVP and its relevant mechanisms with respect to CO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Su, Longxiang, Pan, Pan, Li, Dongkai, Zhang, Qing, Zhou, Xiang, Long, Yun, Wang, Xiaoting, Liu, Dawei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6803478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31681775
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2019.00216
_version_ 1783460942488535040
author Su, Longxiang
Pan, Pan
Li, Dongkai
Zhang, Qing
Zhou, Xiang
Long, Yun
Wang, Xiaoting
Liu, Dawei
author_facet Su, Longxiang
Pan, Pan
Li, Dongkai
Zhang, Qing
Zhou, Xiang
Long, Yun
Wang, Xiaoting
Liu, Dawei
author_sort Su, Longxiang
collection PubMed
description Background: The Frank-Starling curve is the basis of hemodynamics. Changes in cardiac output (CO) caused by central venous pressure (CVP) are the most important concerns in the treatment of critically ill patients. Objectives: To explore the use of CVP and its relevant mechanisms with respect to CO in the clinic. Methods: A total of 134 patients with circulatory shock were retrospectively included and analyzed. Hemodynamic data were recorded and analyzed at PICCO initiation and 24 h after PICCO. Data regarding 28-day mortality and renal function were also collected. Results: The patients were divided into a CVP↑+ CO↑ group (n = 23), a CVP↑+ CO↓ group (n = 29), a CVP↓+ CO↑ group (n = 44), and a CVP↓+ CO↓ group (n = 38) based on values at PICCO initiation and 24 h after PICCO. Post- hoc tests showed that the CVP↓+ CO↑ group had a higher 28-day survival than the other groups [log-rank (Mantel-Cox) = 8.758, 95%, CI, 20.112–23.499, P = 0.033]. In terms of hemodynamic characteristics, the CVP↓+ CO↑ group had a lower cardiac function index (CFI) (4.1 ± 1.4/min) and higher extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) (11.0 ± 4.7 ml/kg) at PICCO initiation. This group used more cardiotonic drugs (77.3%, P < 0.001) and had a negative fluid balance (−780.4 ± 1720.6 ml/24 h, P = 0.018) 24 h after PICCO than the other three groups. Cardiotonic drug use and dehydration treatment were associated with increased CFI (from 4.1 ± 1.4 /min to 4.5 ± 1.3/min, P = 0.07) and reduced ELVWI (from 11.0 ± 4.7 ml/kg to 9.0 ± 3.5 ml/kg, P = 0.029). Renal function tests showed that SCr and BUN levels in the CVP↓+ CO↑ group were significantly improved (SCr from 197.1 ± 128.9 mmol/L to 154.4 ± 90.8 mmol/L; BUN from 14.3 μmol/L ± 7.3 to 11.6 ± 7.0 μmol/L, P < 0.05). Conclusions: Lower CVP was associated with increased CO, which may improve the 28-day prognosis in patients with circulatory shock. Notably, higher CO derived from lower CVP may also contribute to renal function improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6803478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68034782019-11-03 Central Venous Pressure (CVP) Reduction Associated With Higher Cardiac Output (CO) Favors Good Prognosis of Circulatory Shock: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study Su, Longxiang Pan, Pan Li, Dongkai Zhang, Qing Zhou, Xiang Long, Yun Wang, Xiaoting Liu, Dawei Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Background: The Frank-Starling curve is the basis of hemodynamics. Changes in cardiac output (CO) caused by central venous pressure (CVP) are the most important concerns in the treatment of critically ill patients. Objectives: To explore the use of CVP and its relevant mechanisms with respect to CO in the clinic. Methods: A total of 134 patients with circulatory shock were retrospectively included and analyzed. Hemodynamic data were recorded and analyzed at PICCO initiation and 24 h after PICCO. Data regarding 28-day mortality and renal function were also collected. Results: The patients were divided into a CVP↑+ CO↑ group (n = 23), a CVP↑+ CO↓ group (n = 29), a CVP↓+ CO↑ group (n = 44), and a CVP↓+ CO↓ group (n = 38) based on values at PICCO initiation and 24 h after PICCO. Post- hoc tests showed that the CVP↓+ CO↑ group had a higher 28-day survival than the other groups [log-rank (Mantel-Cox) = 8.758, 95%, CI, 20.112–23.499, P = 0.033]. In terms of hemodynamic characteristics, the CVP↓+ CO↑ group had a lower cardiac function index (CFI) (4.1 ± 1.4/min) and higher extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) (11.0 ± 4.7 ml/kg) at PICCO initiation. This group used more cardiotonic drugs (77.3%, P < 0.001) and had a negative fluid balance (−780.4 ± 1720.6 ml/24 h, P = 0.018) 24 h after PICCO than the other three groups. Cardiotonic drug use and dehydration treatment were associated with increased CFI (from 4.1 ± 1.4 /min to 4.5 ± 1.3/min, P = 0.07) and reduced ELVWI (from 11.0 ± 4.7 ml/kg to 9.0 ± 3.5 ml/kg, P = 0.029). Renal function tests showed that SCr and BUN levels in the CVP↓+ CO↑ group were significantly improved (SCr from 197.1 ± 128.9 mmol/L to 154.4 ± 90.8 mmol/L; BUN from 14.3 μmol/L ± 7.3 to 11.6 ± 7.0 μmol/L, P < 0.05). Conclusions: Lower CVP was associated with increased CO, which may improve the 28-day prognosis in patients with circulatory shock. Notably, higher CO derived from lower CVP may also contribute to renal function improvement. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6803478/ /pubmed/31681775 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2019.00216 Text en Copyright © 2019 Su, Pan, Li, Zhang, Zhou, Long, Wang and Liu. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Su, Longxiang
Pan, Pan
Li, Dongkai
Zhang, Qing
Zhou, Xiang
Long, Yun
Wang, Xiaoting
Liu, Dawei
Central Venous Pressure (CVP) Reduction Associated With Higher Cardiac Output (CO) Favors Good Prognosis of Circulatory Shock: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study
title Central Venous Pressure (CVP) Reduction Associated With Higher Cardiac Output (CO) Favors Good Prognosis of Circulatory Shock: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full Central Venous Pressure (CVP) Reduction Associated With Higher Cardiac Output (CO) Favors Good Prognosis of Circulatory Shock: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Central Venous Pressure (CVP) Reduction Associated With Higher Cardiac Output (CO) Favors Good Prognosis of Circulatory Shock: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Central Venous Pressure (CVP) Reduction Associated With Higher Cardiac Output (CO) Favors Good Prognosis of Circulatory Shock: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short Central Venous Pressure (CVP) Reduction Associated With Higher Cardiac Output (CO) Favors Good Prognosis of Circulatory Shock: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort central venous pressure (cvp) reduction associated with higher cardiac output (co) favors good prognosis of circulatory shock: a single-center, retrospective cohort study
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6803478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31681775
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2019.00216
work_keys_str_mv AT sulongxiang centralvenouspressurecvpreductionassociatedwithhighercardiacoutputcofavorsgoodprognosisofcirculatoryshockasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT panpan centralvenouspressurecvpreductionassociatedwithhighercardiacoutputcofavorsgoodprognosisofcirculatoryshockasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lidongkai centralvenouspressurecvpreductionassociatedwithhighercardiacoutputcofavorsgoodprognosisofcirculatoryshockasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhangqing centralvenouspressurecvpreductionassociatedwithhighercardiacoutputcofavorsgoodprognosisofcirculatoryshockasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhouxiang centralvenouspressurecvpreductionassociatedwithhighercardiacoutputcofavorsgoodprognosisofcirculatoryshockasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT longyun centralvenouspressurecvpreductionassociatedwithhighercardiacoutputcofavorsgoodprognosisofcirculatoryshockasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wangxiaoting centralvenouspressurecvpreductionassociatedwithhighercardiacoutputcofavorsgoodprognosisofcirculatoryshockasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT liudawei centralvenouspressurecvpreductionassociatedwithhighercardiacoutputcofavorsgoodprognosisofcirculatoryshockasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy