Cargando…
Prognostic Factors and Optimal Response Interval for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Lung Oligometastases or Oligoprogression From Colorectal Cancer
Purpose: To analyze the prognostic factors and optimal response interval for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with lung oligometastases (OM) or oligoprogression (OP) from colorectal cancer (CRC). Method: Patients with lung OM or OP from CRC treated by SBRT at our hospital were inclu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6803520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31681609 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01080 |
_version_ | 1783460952888311808 |
---|---|
author | Li, Shuai Dong, Dezuo Geng, Jianhao Zhu, Xianggao Shi, Chen Zhang, Yangzi Wang, Hongzhi Zhou, Shun Wu, Hao Cai, Yong Li, Yongheng Wang, Weihu |
author_facet | Li, Shuai Dong, Dezuo Geng, Jianhao Zhu, Xianggao Shi, Chen Zhang, Yangzi Wang, Hongzhi Zhou, Shun Wu, Hao Cai, Yong Li, Yongheng Wang, Weihu |
author_sort | Li, Shuai |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: To analyze the prognostic factors and optimal response interval for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with lung oligometastases (OM) or oligoprogression (OP) from colorectal cancer (CRC). Method: Patients with lung OM or OP from CRC treated by SBRT at our hospital were included in this retrospective review. The local control (LC), response to SBRT in different evaluation interval and regional metastases (RM) was analyzed. The risk factor for LC and RM was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the Log-rank test. Multivariate analysis with a Cox proportional hazards model was used to test independent significance. Results: A total of 53 patients with 105 lung metastases lesions treated from 2012 to 2018 were involved in this retrospective study. The median biologically effective dose (BED) for these patients was 100 Gy (range: 75–131.2 Gy). Complete response (CR) increased from 27 (25.7%) to 46 (43.8%) lesions at 1.8 and 5.3 months following SBRT, and at the last follow-up, 52 (49.5%) lesions achieved CR. The median follow-up duration for all patients was 14 months (range: 5–63 months), and 1-year LC was 90.4%. During the follow-up, 10 lesions suffered local relapse after SBRT (9 of them occurred within 8 months after SBRT). The univariate analysis shows BED ≥ 100 Gy (P = 0.003) and gross tumor volume (GTV) < 1.6 cm(3) (P = 0.011) were better predictors for 1-year LC. The patients with lung oligoprogression had higher 1-year RM when compared with patients with lung oligometastases (hazard ratio 2.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04–7.48, P = 0.042). Until the last follow up, 4 (7.5%) patients suffered grade 2 radiation pneumonitis, and no grade 3–4 toxicity was observed. Conclusions: SBRT provides favorable LC in CRC patients with lung OM or OP, and the GTV and BED can affect the LC. Radiology examinations nearly 5–6 months following SBRT appear to represent the final local effect of SBRT, and the patients with oligoprogression has higher RM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6803520 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68035202019-11-03 Prognostic Factors and Optimal Response Interval for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Lung Oligometastases or Oligoprogression From Colorectal Cancer Li, Shuai Dong, Dezuo Geng, Jianhao Zhu, Xianggao Shi, Chen Zhang, Yangzi Wang, Hongzhi Zhou, Shun Wu, Hao Cai, Yong Li, Yongheng Wang, Weihu Front Oncol Oncology Purpose: To analyze the prognostic factors and optimal response interval for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with lung oligometastases (OM) or oligoprogression (OP) from colorectal cancer (CRC). Method: Patients with lung OM or OP from CRC treated by SBRT at our hospital were included in this retrospective review. The local control (LC), response to SBRT in different evaluation interval and regional metastases (RM) was analyzed. The risk factor for LC and RM was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the Log-rank test. Multivariate analysis with a Cox proportional hazards model was used to test independent significance. Results: A total of 53 patients with 105 lung metastases lesions treated from 2012 to 2018 were involved in this retrospective study. The median biologically effective dose (BED) for these patients was 100 Gy (range: 75–131.2 Gy). Complete response (CR) increased from 27 (25.7%) to 46 (43.8%) lesions at 1.8 and 5.3 months following SBRT, and at the last follow-up, 52 (49.5%) lesions achieved CR. The median follow-up duration for all patients was 14 months (range: 5–63 months), and 1-year LC was 90.4%. During the follow-up, 10 lesions suffered local relapse after SBRT (9 of them occurred within 8 months after SBRT). The univariate analysis shows BED ≥ 100 Gy (P = 0.003) and gross tumor volume (GTV) < 1.6 cm(3) (P = 0.011) were better predictors for 1-year LC. The patients with lung oligoprogression had higher 1-year RM when compared with patients with lung oligometastases (hazard ratio 2.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04–7.48, P = 0.042). Until the last follow up, 4 (7.5%) patients suffered grade 2 radiation pneumonitis, and no grade 3–4 toxicity was observed. Conclusions: SBRT provides favorable LC in CRC patients with lung OM or OP, and the GTV and BED can affect the LC. Radiology examinations nearly 5–6 months following SBRT appear to represent the final local effect of SBRT, and the patients with oligoprogression has higher RM. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6803520/ /pubmed/31681609 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01080 Text en Copyright © 2019 Li, Dong, Geng, Zhu, Shi, Zhang, Wang, Zhou, Wu, Cai, Li and Wang. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Li, Shuai Dong, Dezuo Geng, Jianhao Zhu, Xianggao Shi, Chen Zhang, Yangzi Wang, Hongzhi Zhou, Shun Wu, Hao Cai, Yong Li, Yongheng Wang, Weihu Prognostic Factors and Optimal Response Interval for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Lung Oligometastases or Oligoprogression From Colorectal Cancer |
title | Prognostic Factors and Optimal Response Interval for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Lung Oligometastases or Oligoprogression From Colorectal Cancer |
title_full | Prognostic Factors and Optimal Response Interval for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Lung Oligometastases or Oligoprogression From Colorectal Cancer |
title_fullStr | Prognostic Factors and Optimal Response Interval for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Lung Oligometastases or Oligoprogression From Colorectal Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic Factors and Optimal Response Interval for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Lung Oligometastases or Oligoprogression From Colorectal Cancer |
title_short | Prognostic Factors and Optimal Response Interval for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Lung Oligometastases or Oligoprogression From Colorectal Cancer |
title_sort | prognostic factors and optimal response interval for stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with lung oligometastases or oligoprogression from colorectal cancer |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6803520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31681609 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01080 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lishuai prognosticfactorsandoptimalresponseintervalforstereotacticbodyradiotherapyinpatientswithlungoligometastasesoroligoprogressionfromcolorectalcancer AT dongdezuo prognosticfactorsandoptimalresponseintervalforstereotacticbodyradiotherapyinpatientswithlungoligometastasesoroligoprogressionfromcolorectalcancer AT gengjianhao prognosticfactorsandoptimalresponseintervalforstereotacticbodyradiotherapyinpatientswithlungoligometastasesoroligoprogressionfromcolorectalcancer AT zhuxianggao prognosticfactorsandoptimalresponseintervalforstereotacticbodyradiotherapyinpatientswithlungoligometastasesoroligoprogressionfromcolorectalcancer AT shichen prognosticfactorsandoptimalresponseintervalforstereotacticbodyradiotherapyinpatientswithlungoligometastasesoroligoprogressionfromcolorectalcancer AT zhangyangzi prognosticfactorsandoptimalresponseintervalforstereotacticbodyradiotherapyinpatientswithlungoligometastasesoroligoprogressionfromcolorectalcancer AT wanghongzhi prognosticfactorsandoptimalresponseintervalforstereotacticbodyradiotherapyinpatientswithlungoligometastasesoroligoprogressionfromcolorectalcancer AT zhoushun prognosticfactorsandoptimalresponseintervalforstereotacticbodyradiotherapyinpatientswithlungoligometastasesoroligoprogressionfromcolorectalcancer AT wuhao prognosticfactorsandoptimalresponseintervalforstereotacticbodyradiotherapyinpatientswithlungoligometastasesoroligoprogressionfromcolorectalcancer AT caiyong prognosticfactorsandoptimalresponseintervalforstereotacticbodyradiotherapyinpatientswithlungoligometastasesoroligoprogressionfromcolorectalcancer AT liyongheng prognosticfactorsandoptimalresponseintervalforstereotacticbodyradiotherapyinpatientswithlungoligometastasesoroligoprogressionfromcolorectalcancer AT wangweihu prognosticfactorsandoptimalresponseintervalforstereotacticbodyradiotherapyinpatientswithlungoligometastasesoroligoprogressionfromcolorectalcancer |