Cargando…
Reflecting on shared decision making: A reflection‐quantification study
BACKGROUND: Reflecting (“stop‐and‐think”) before rating may help patients consider the quality of shared decision making (SDM) and mitigate ceiling/halo effects that limit the performance of self‐reported SDM measures. METHODS: We asked a diverse patient sample from the United States to reflect on t...
Autores principales: | Kunneman, Marleen, LaVecchia, Christina M., Singh Ospina, Naykky, Abu Dabrh, Abd Moain, Behnken, Emma M., Wilson, Patrick, Branda, Megan E., Hargraves, Ian G., Yost, Kathleen J., Frankel, Richard M., Montori, Victor M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6803557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31414553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12953 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Envisioning Shared Decision Making: A Reflection for the Next Decade
por: Barton, Jennifer L., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Problem‐based shared decision making: The role of canonical SDM steps
por: Montori, Victor M., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Fostering Choice Awareness for Shared Decision Making: A Secondary Analysis of Video-Recorded Clinical Encounters
por: Kunneman, Marleen, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Problem-based shared decision-making in diabetes care: a secondary analysis of video-recorded encounters
por: Ruissen, Merel M, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Shared decision-making as a method of care
por: Montori, Victor M, et al.
Publicado: (2023)