Cargando…

The role of information provision in economic evaluations of non-invasive prenatal testing: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Technological progress has led to changes in the antenatal screening programmes, most significantly the introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). The availability of a new type of testing changes the type of information that the parent(s) require before, during and after scre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: John, Nikita M., Wright, Stuart J., Gavan, Sean P., Vass, Caroline M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6803567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31230226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-019-01082-x
_version_ 1783460966080446464
author John, Nikita M.
Wright, Stuart J.
Gavan, Sean P.
Vass, Caroline M.
author_facet John, Nikita M.
Wright, Stuart J.
Gavan, Sean P.
Vass, Caroline M.
author_sort John, Nikita M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Technological progress has led to changes in the antenatal screening programmes, most significantly the introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). The availability of a new type of testing changes the type of information that the parent(s) require before, during and after screening to mitigate anxiety about the testing process and results. OBJECTIVES: To identify the extent to which economic evaluations of NIPT have accounted for the need to provide information alongside testing and the associated costs and health outcomes of information provision. METHODS: A systematic review of economic evaluations of NIPTs (up to February 2018) was conducted. Medline, Embase, CINAHL and PsychINFO were searched using an electronic search strategy combining a published economic search filter (from NHS economic evaluations database) with terms related to NIPT and screening-related technologies. Data were extracted using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards framework and the results were summarised as part of a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: A total of 12 economic evaluations were identified. The majority of evaluations (n = 10; 83.3%) involved cost effectiveness analysis. Only four studies (33.3%) included the cost of providing information about NIPT in their economic evaluation. Two studies considered the impact of test results on parents’ quality of life by allowing utility decrements for different outcomes. Some studies suggested that the challenges of valuing information prohibited their inclusion in an economic evaluation. CONCLUSION: Economic evaluations of NIPTs need to account for the costs and outcomes associated with information provision, otherwise estimates of cost effectiveness may prove inaccurate. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10198-019-01082-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6803567
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68035672019-11-05 The role of information provision in economic evaluations of non-invasive prenatal testing: a systematic review John, Nikita M. Wright, Stuart J. Gavan, Sean P. Vass, Caroline M. Eur J Health Econ Original Paper BACKGROUND: Technological progress has led to changes in the antenatal screening programmes, most significantly the introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). The availability of a new type of testing changes the type of information that the parent(s) require before, during and after screening to mitigate anxiety about the testing process and results. OBJECTIVES: To identify the extent to which economic evaluations of NIPT have accounted for the need to provide information alongside testing and the associated costs and health outcomes of information provision. METHODS: A systematic review of economic evaluations of NIPTs (up to February 2018) was conducted. Medline, Embase, CINAHL and PsychINFO were searched using an electronic search strategy combining a published economic search filter (from NHS economic evaluations database) with terms related to NIPT and screening-related technologies. Data were extracted using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards framework and the results were summarised as part of a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: A total of 12 economic evaluations were identified. The majority of evaluations (n = 10; 83.3%) involved cost effectiveness analysis. Only four studies (33.3%) included the cost of providing information about NIPT in their economic evaluation. Two studies considered the impact of test results on parents’ quality of life by allowing utility decrements for different outcomes. Some studies suggested that the challenges of valuing information prohibited their inclusion in an economic evaluation. CONCLUSION: Economic evaluations of NIPTs need to account for the costs and outcomes associated with information provision, otherwise estimates of cost effectiveness may prove inaccurate. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10198-019-01082-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-06-22 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6803567/ /pubmed/31230226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-019-01082-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
John, Nikita M.
Wright, Stuart J.
Gavan, Sean P.
Vass, Caroline M.
The role of information provision in economic evaluations of non-invasive prenatal testing: a systematic review
title The role of information provision in economic evaluations of non-invasive prenatal testing: a systematic review
title_full The role of information provision in economic evaluations of non-invasive prenatal testing: a systematic review
title_fullStr The role of information provision in economic evaluations of non-invasive prenatal testing: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The role of information provision in economic evaluations of non-invasive prenatal testing: a systematic review
title_short The role of information provision in economic evaluations of non-invasive prenatal testing: a systematic review
title_sort role of information provision in economic evaluations of non-invasive prenatal testing: a systematic review
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6803567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31230226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-019-01082-x
work_keys_str_mv AT johnnikitam theroleofinformationprovisionineconomicevaluationsofnoninvasiveprenataltestingasystematicreview
AT wrightstuartj theroleofinformationprovisionineconomicevaluationsofnoninvasiveprenataltestingasystematicreview
AT gavanseanp theroleofinformationprovisionineconomicevaluationsofnoninvasiveprenataltestingasystematicreview
AT vasscarolinem theroleofinformationprovisionineconomicevaluationsofnoninvasiveprenataltestingasystematicreview
AT johnnikitam roleofinformationprovisionineconomicevaluationsofnoninvasiveprenataltestingasystematicreview
AT wrightstuartj roleofinformationprovisionineconomicevaluationsofnoninvasiveprenataltestingasystematicreview
AT gavanseanp roleofinformationprovisionineconomicevaluationsofnoninvasiveprenataltestingasystematicreview
AT vasscarolinem roleofinformationprovisionineconomicevaluationsofnoninvasiveprenataltestingasystematicreview