Cargando…
Tensile Strength of Novel Nonabsorbable PTFE (Teflon®) versus Other Suture Materials: An In Vitro Study
OBJECTIVE: To compare the in vitro tensile strength of sutures used in implant surgery according to the type of thread and the immersion time in artificial saliva. METHODS: For the development of the study, three suture materials were used: polyglactin 910 (PG), black silk (BS), and Teflon (PTFE) 4-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6803732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31687026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7419708 |
_version_ | 1783461009445355520 |
---|---|
author | Arce, José Palacios, Alondra Alvítez-Temoche, Daniel Mendoza-Azpur, G. Romero-Tapia, Percy Mayta-Tovalino, Frank |
author_facet | Arce, José Palacios, Alondra Alvítez-Temoche, Daniel Mendoza-Azpur, G. Romero-Tapia, Percy Mayta-Tovalino, Frank |
author_sort | Arce, José |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the in vitro tensile strength of sutures used in implant surgery according to the type of thread and the immersion time in artificial saliva. METHODS: For the development of the study, three suture materials were used: polyglactin 910 (PG), black silk (BS), and Teflon (PTFE) 4-0; 150 samples were used, which were divided among each type of suture and then subdivided into five groups of 10 according to the various immersion times (baseline, 3, 7, 14, and 21 days) in artificial saliva. A universal test machine was used to measure the tensile strength at a speed of 25 cm/min, stretch each sample until the material fails, and record the maximum strength in Newtons (N). Finally, the failure point of the samples was evaluated at 10× increase using a stereromicroscope (Leica Biosystems). RESULTS: When analyzing the tensile strength of the various groups of sutures, it was evidenced that PG maintained its strength, which was lowest at baseline and highest at 21 days. When performing the statistical inference of PG and PTFE, it was found that the force necessary to achieve detachment was not statistically significant (p < 0.05). However, it was shown that the force necessary to achieve rupture in the BS group was statistically significant (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: To sum up, when comparing the in vitro tensile strength of PG, BS, and PTFE sutures at baseline and 3, 7, 14, and 21 days, there was no statistically significant difference. This indicates that all sutures used present sufficient performance that remains resistant as time progresses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6803732 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68037322019-11-04 Tensile Strength of Novel Nonabsorbable PTFE (Teflon®) versus Other Suture Materials: An In Vitro Study Arce, José Palacios, Alondra Alvítez-Temoche, Daniel Mendoza-Azpur, G. Romero-Tapia, Percy Mayta-Tovalino, Frank Int J Dent Research Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the in vitro tensile strength of sutures used in implant surgery according to the type of thread and the immersion time in artificial saliva. METHODS: For the development of the study, three suture materials were used: polyglactin 910 (PG), black silk (BS), and Teflon (PTFE) 4-0; 150 samples were used, which were divided among each type of suture and then subdivided into five groups of 10 according to the various immersion times (baseline, 3, 7, 14, and 21 days) in artificial saliva. A universal test machine was used to measure the tensile strength at a speed of 25 cm/min, stretch each sample until the material fails, and record the maximum strength in Newtons (N). Finally, the failure point of the samples was evaluated at 10× increase using a stereromicroscope (Leica Biosystems). RESULTS: When analyzing the tensile strength of the various groups of sutures, it was evidenced that PG maintained its strength, which was lowest at baseline and highest at 21 days. When performing the statistical inference of PG and PTFE, it was found that the force necessary to achieve detachment was not statistically significant (p < 0.05). However, it was shown that the force necessary to achieve rupture in the BS group was statistically significant (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: To sum up, when comparing the in vitro tensile strength of PG, BS, and PTFE sutures at baseline and 3, 7, 14, and 21 days, there was no statistically significant difference. This indicates that all sutures used present sufficient performance that remains resistant as time progresses. Hindawi 2019-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6803732/ /pubmed/31687026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7419708 Text en Copyright © 2019 José Arce et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Arce, José Palacios, Alondra Alvítez-Temoche, Daniel Mendoza-Azpur, G. Romero-Tapia, Percy Mayta-Tovalino, Frank Tensile Strength of Novel Nonabsorbable PTFE (Teflon®) versus Other Suture Materials: An In Vitro Study |
title | Tensile Strength of Novel Nonabsorbable PTFE (Teflon®) versus Other Suture Materials: An In Vitro Study |
title_full | Tensile Strength of Novel Nonabsorbable PTFE (Teflon®) versus Other Suture Materials: An In Vitro Study |
title_fullStr | Tensile Strength of Novel Nonabsorbable PTFE (Teflon®) versus Other Suture Materials: An In Vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Tensile Strength of Novel Nonabsorbable PTFE (Teflon®) versus Other Suture Materials: An In Vitro Study |
title_short | Tensile Strength of Novel Nonabsorbable PTFE (Teflon®) versus Other Suture Materials: An In Vitro Study |
title_sort | tensile strength of novel nonabsorbable ptfe (teflon®) versus other suture materials: an in vitro study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6803732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31687026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7419708 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arcejose tensilestrengthofnovelnonabsorbableptfeteflonversusothersuturematerialsaninvitrostudy AT palaciosalondra tensilestrengthofnovelnonabsorbableptfeteflonversusothersuturematerialsaninvitrostudy AT alviteztemochedaniel tensilestrengthofnovelnonabsorbableptfeteflonversusothersuturematerialsaninvitrostudy AT mendozaazpurg tensilestrengthofnovelnonabsorbableptfeteflonversusothersuturematerialsaninvitrostudy AT romerotapiapercy tensilestrengthofnovelnonabsorbableptfeteflonversusothersuturematerialsaninvitrostudy AT maytatovalinofrank tensilestrengthofnovelnonabsorbableptfeteflonversusothersuturematerialsaninvitrostudy |