Cargando…

Tensile Strength of Novel Nonabsorbable PTFE (Teflon®) versus Other Suture Materials: An In Vitro Study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the in vitro tensile strength of sutures used in implant surgery according to the type of thread and the immersion time in artificial saliva. METHODS: For the development of the study, three suture materials were used: polyglactin 910 (PG), black silk (BS), and Teflon (PTFE) 4-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arce, José, Palacios, Alondra, Alvítez-Temoche, Daniel, Mendoza-Azpur, G., Romero-Tapia, Percy, Mayta-Tovalino, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6803732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31687026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7419708
_version_ 1783461009445355520
author Arce, José
Palacios, Alondra
Alvítez-Temoche, Daniel
Mendoza-Azpur, G.
Romero-Tapia, Percy
Mayta-Tovalino, Frank
author_facet Arce, José
Palacios, Alondra
Alvítez-Temoche, Daniel
Mendoza-Azpur, G.
Romero-Tapia, Percy
Mayta-Tovalino, Frank
author_sort Arce, José
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the in vitro tensile strength of sutures used in implant surgery according to the type of thread and the immersion time in artificial saliva. METHODS: For the development of the study, three suture materials were used: polyglactin 910 (PG), black silk (BS), and Teflon (PTFE) 4-0; 150 samples were used, which were divided among each type of suture and then subdivided into five groups of 10 according to the various immersion times (baseline, 3, 7, 14, and 21 days) in artificial saliva. A universal test machine was used to measure the tensile strength at a speed of 25 cm/min, stretch each sample until the material fails, and record the maximum strength in Newtons (N). Finally, the failure point of the samples was evaluated at 10× increase using a stereromicroscope (Leica Biosystems). RESULTS: When analyzing the tensile strength of the various groups of sutures, it was evidenced that PG maintained its strength, which was lowest at baseline and highest at 21 days. When performing the statistical inference of PG and PTFE, it was found that the force necessary to achieve detachment was not statistically significant (p < 0.05). However, it was shown that the force necessary to achieve rupture in the BS group was statistically significant (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: To sum up, when comparing the in vitro tensile strength of PG, BS, and PTFE sutures at baseline and 3, 7, 14, and 21 days, there was no statistically significant difference. This indicates that all sutures used present sufficient performance that remains resistant as time progresses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6803732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68037322019-11-04 Tensile Strength of Novel Nonabsorbable PTFE (Teflon®) versus Other Suture Materials: An In Vitro Study Arce, José Palacios, Alondra Alvítez-Temoche, Daniel Mendoza-Azpur, G. Romero-Tapia, Percy Mayta-Tovalino, Frank Int J Dent Research Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the in vitro tensile strength of sutures used in implant surgery according to the type of thread and the immersion time in artificial saliva. METHODS: For the development of the study, three suture materials were used: polyglactin 910 (PG), black silk (BS), and Teflon (PTFE) 4-0; 150 samples were used, which were divided among each type of suture and then subdivided into five groups of 10 according to the various immersion times (baseline, 3, 7, 14, and 21 days) in artificial saliva. A universal test machine was used to measure the tensile strength at a speed of 25 cm/min, stretch each sample until the material fails, and record the maximum strength in Newtons (N). Finally, the failure point of the samples was evaluated at 10× increase using a stereromicroscope (Leica Biosystems). RESULTS: When analyzing the tensile strength of the various groups of sutures, it was evidenced that PG maintained its strength, which was lowest at baseline and highest at 21 days. When performing the statistical inference of PG and PTFE, it was found that the force necessary to achieve detachment was not statistically significant (p < 0.05). However, it was shown that the force necessary to achieve rupture in the BS group was statistically significant (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: To sum up, when comparing the in vitro tensile strength of PG, BS, and PTFE sutures at baseline and 3, 7, 14, and 21 days, there was no statistically significant difference. This indicates that all sutures used present sufficient performance that remains resistant as time progresses. Hindawi 2019-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6803732/ /pubmed/31687026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7419708 Text en Copyright © 2019 José Arce et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Arce, José
Palacios, Alondra
Alvítez-Temoche, Daniel
Mendoza-Azpur, G.
Romero-Tapia, Percy
Mayta-Tovalino, Frank
Tensile Strength of Novel Nonabsorbable PTFE (Teflon®) versus Other Suture Materials: An In Vitro Study
title Tensile Strength of Novel Nonabsorbable PTFE (Teflon®) versus Other Suture Materials: An In Vitro Study
title_full Tensile Strength of Novel Nonabsorbable PTFE (Teflon®) versus Other Suture Materials: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Tensile Strength of Novel Nonabsorbable PTFE (Teflon®) versus Other Suture Materials: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Tensile Strength of Novel Nonabsorbable PTFE (Teflon®) versus Other Suture Materials: An In Vitro Study
title_short Tensile Strength of Novel Nonabsorbable PTFE (Teflon®) versus Other Suture Materials: An In Vitro Study
title_sort tensile strength of novel nonabsorbable ptfe (teflon®) versus other suture materials: an in vitro study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6803732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31687026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7419708
work_keys_str_mv AT arcejose tensilestrengthofnovelnonabsorbableptfeteflonversusothersuturematerialsaninvitrostudy
AT palaciosalondra tensilestrengthofnovelnonabsorbableptfeteflonversusothersuturematerialsaninvitrostudy
AT alviteztemochedaniel tensilestrengthofnovelnonabsorbableptfeteflonversusothersuturematerialsaninvitrostudy
AT mendozaazpurg tensilestrengthofnovelnonabsorbableptfeteflonversusothersuturematerialsaninvitrostudy
AT romerotapiapercy tensilestrengthofnovelnonabsorbableptfeteflonversusothersuturematerialsaninvitrostudy
AT maytatovalinofrank tensilestrengthofnovelnonabsorbableptfeteflonversusothersuturematerialsaninvitrostudy