Cargando…

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of a Novel Al-Ion and a Li-Ion Battery for Stationary Applications

The foreseen high penetration of fluctuant renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar, will cause an increased need for batteries to store the energy produced and not instantaneously consumed. Due to the high production cost and significant environmental impacts associated with the production...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salgado Delgado, Mario Amin, Usai, Lorenzo, Pan, Qiaoyan, Hammer Strømman, Anders
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6803941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31597317
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12193270
_version_ 1783461064906637312
author Salgado Delgado, Mario Amin
Usai, Lorenzo
Pan, Qiaoyan
Hammer Strømman, Anders
author_facet Salgado Delgado, Mario Amin
Usai, Lorenzo
Pan, Qiaoyan
Hammer Strømman, Anders
author_sort Salgado Delgado, Mario Amin
collection PubMed
description The foreseen high penetration of fluctuant renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar, will cause an increased need for batteries to store the energy produced and not instantaneously consumed. Due to the high production cost and significant environmental impacts associated with the production of lithium-ion nickel-manganese-cobalt (Li-ion NMC) batteries, several chemistries are proposed as a potential substitute. This study aims to identify and compare the lifecycle environmental impacts springing from a novel Al-ion battery, with the current state-of-the-art chemistry, i.e., Li-ion NMC. The global warming potential (GWP) indicator was selected to express the results due to its relevance to society, policy and to facilitate the comparison of our results with other research. The cradle-to-grave process-based assessment uses two functional units: (1) per-cell manufactured and (2) per-Wh of storage capacity. The results identified the battery’s production as the highest carbon intensity phase, being the energy usage the main contributor to GWP. In general, the materials and process involved in the manufacturing and recycling of the novel battery achieve a lower environmental impact in comparison to the Li-ion technology. However, due to the Al-ion’s low energy density, a higher amount of materials are needed to deliver equivalent performance than a Li-ion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6803941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68039412019-11-18 Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of a Novel Al-Ion and a Li-Ion Battery for Stationary Applications Salgado Delgado, Mario Amin Usai, Lorenzo Pan, Qiaoyan Hammer Strømman, Anders Materials (Basel) Article The foreseen high penetration of fluctuant renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar, will cause an increased need for batteries to store the energy produced and not instantaneously consumed. Due to the high production cost and significant environmental impacts associated with the production of lithium-ion nickel-manganese-cobalt (Li-ion NMC) batteries, several chemistries are proposed as a potential substitute. This study aims to identify and compare the lifecycle environmental impacts springing from a novel Al-ion battery, with the current state-of-the-art chemistry, i.e., Li-ion NMC. The global warming potential (GWP) indicator was selected to express the results due to its relevance to society, policy and to facilitate the comparison of our results with other research. The cradle-to-grave process-based assessment uses two functional units: (1) per-cell manufactured and (2) per-Wh of storage capacity. The results identified the battery’s production as the highest carbon intensity phase, being the energy usage the main contributor to GWP. In general, the materials and process involved in the manufacturing and recycling of the novel battery achieve a lower environmental impact in comparison to the Li-ion technology. However, due to the Al-ion’s low energy density, a higher amount of materials are needed to deliver equivalent performance than a Li-ion. MDPI 2019-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6803941/ /pubmed/31597317 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12193270 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Salgado Delgado, Mario Amin
Usai, Lorenzo
Pan, Qiaoyan
Hammer Strømman, Anders
Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of a Novel Al-Ion and a Li-Ion Battery for Stationary Applications
title Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of a Novel Al-Ion and a Li-Ion Battery for Stationary Applications
title_full Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of a Novel Al-Ion and a Li-Ion Battery for Stationary Applications
title_fullStr Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of a Novel Al-Ion and a Li-Ion Battery for Stationary Applications
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of a Novel Al-Ion and a Li-Ion Battery for Stationary Applications
title_short Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of a Novel Al-Ion and a Li-Ion Battery for Stationary Applications
title_sort comparative life cycle assessment of a novel al-ion and a li-ion battery for stationary applications
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6803941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31597317
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12193270
work_keys_str_mv AT salgadodelgadomarioamin comparativelifecycleassessmentofanovelalionandaliionbatteryforstationaryapplications
AT usailorenzo comparativelifecycleassessmentofanovelalionandaliionbatteryforstationaryapplications
AT panqiaoyan comparativelifecycleassessmentofanovelalionandaliionbatteryforstationaryapplications
AT hammerstrømmananders comparativelifecycleassessmentofanovelalionandaliionbatteryforstationaryapplications