Cargando…
Ultrasound and Microwave Assisted Extraction of Opuntia Fruit Peels Biocompounds: Optimization and Comparison Using RSM-CCD
Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) of bioactive compounds, peels from Opuntia engelmannii cultivar (cv.) Valencia were optimized by response surface methodology. Randomized extraction runs were performed for each of the technologies employed in order to buil...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6804160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31597259 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules24193618 |
_version_ | 1783461119106482176 |
---|---|
author | Melgar, Bruno Dias, Maria Inês Barros, Lillian Ferreira, Isabel C.F.R. Rodriguez-Lopez, Antonio D. Garcia-Castello, Esperanza M. |
author_facet | Melgar, Bruno Dias, Maria Inês Barros, Lillian Ferreira, Isabel C.F.R. Rodriguez-Lopez, Antonio D. Garcia-Castello, Esperanza M. |
author_sort | Melgar, Bruno |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) of bioactive compounds, peels from Opuntia engelmannii cultivar (cv.) Valencia were optimized by response surface methodology. Randomized extraction runs were performed for each of the technologies employed in order to build effective models with maximum (bioactive molecules content and yield) and minimum (antioxidant activity) responses. A 5-level, 4-factor central composite design was used to obtain target responses as a function of extraction time (t), solid to liquid ratio (S/L), methanol concentration (metOH), and temperature (T). Specific response optimization for each technology was analyzed, discussed, and general optimization from all the responses together was also gather. The optimum values for each factor were: t = 2.5 and 1.4 min, S/L = 5 and 5 g/L, metOH = 34.6 and 0% of methanol and T = 30 and 36.6 °C, achieving maximum responses of 201.6 and 132.9 mg of betalains/g, 13.9 and 8.0 mg of phenolic acids/g, 2.4 and 1.5 mg of flavonoids/g, 71.8% and 79.1% of extractable solid and IC(50) values for the antioxidant activity of 2.9 and 3.6, for UAE and MAE, respectively. The present study suggested UAE as the best extraction system, in order to maximize recovery of bioactive compounds with a high antioxidant activity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6804160 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68041602019-11-18 Ultrasound and Microwave Assisted Extraction of Opuntia Fruit Peels Biocompounds: Optimization and Comparison Using RSM-CCD Melgar, Bruno Dias, Maria Inês Barros, Lillian Ferreira, Isabel C.F.R. Rodriguez-Lopez, Antonio D. Garcia-Castello, Esperanza M. Molecules Article Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) of bioactive compounds, peels from Opuntia engelmannii cultivar (cv.) Valencia were optimized by response surface methodology. Randomized extraction runs were performed for each of the technologies employed in order to build effective models with maximum (bioactive molecules content and yield) and minimum (antioxidant activity) responses. A 5-level, 4-factor central composite design was used to obtain target responses as a function of extraction time (t), solid to liquid ratio (S/L), methanol concentration (metOH), and temperature (T). Specific response optimization for each technology was analyzed, discussed, and general optimization from all the responses together was also gather. The optimum values for each factor were: t = 2.5 and 1.4 min, S/L = 5 and 5 g/L, metOH = 34.6 and 0% of methanol and T = 30 and 36.6 °C, achieving maximum responses of 201.6 and 132.9 mg of betalains/g, 13.9 and 8.0 mg of phenolic acids/g, 2.4 and 1.5 mg of flavonoids/g, 71.8% and 79.1% of extractable solid and IC(50) values for the antioxidant activity of 2.9 and 3.6, for UAE and MAE, respectively. The present study suggested UAE as the best extraction system, in order to maximize recovery of bioactive compounds with a high antioxidant activity. MDPI 2019-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6804160/ /pubmed/31597259 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules24193618 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Melgar, Bruno Dias, Maria Inês Barros, Lillian Ferreira, Isabel C.F.R. Rodriguez-Lopez, Antonio D. Garcia-Castello, Esperanza M. Ultrasound and Microwave Assisted Extraction of Opuntia Fruit Peels Biocompounds: Optimization and Comparison Using RSM-CCD |
title | Ultrasound and Microwave Assisted Extraction of Opuntia Fruit Peels Biocompounds: Optimization and Comparison Using RSM-CCD |
title_full | Ultrasound and Microwave Assisted Extraction of Opuntia Fruit Peels Biocompounds: Optimization and Comparison Using RSM-CCD |
title_fullStr | Ultrasound and Microwave Assisted Extraction of Opuntia Fruit Peels Biocompounds: Optimization and Comparison Using RSM-CCD |
title_full_unstemmed | Ultrasound and Microwave Assisted Extraction of Opuntia Fruit Peels Biocompounds: Optimization and Comparison Using RSM-CCD |
title_short | Ultrasound and Microwave Assisted Extraction of Opuntia Fruit Peels Biocompounds: Optimization and Comparison Using RSM-CCD |
title_sort | ultrasound and microwave assisted extraction of opuntia fruit peels biocompounds: optimization and comparison using rsm-ccd |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6804160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31597259 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules24193618 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT melgarbruno ultrasoundandmicrowaveassistedextractionofopuntiafruitpeelsbiocompoundsoptimizationandcomparisonusingrsmccd AT diasmariaines ultrasoundandmicrowaveassistedextractionofopuntiafruitpeelsbiocompoundsoptimizationandcomparisonusingrsmccd AT barroslillian ultrasoundandmicrowaveassistedextractionofopuntiafruitpeelsbiocompoundsoptimizationandcomparisonusingrsmccd AT ferreiraisabelcfr ultrasoundandmicrowaveassistedextractionofopuntiafruitpeelsbiocompoundsoptimizationandcomparisonusingrsmccd AT rodriguezlopezantoniod ultrasoundandmicrowaveassistedextractionofopuntiafruitpeelsbiocompoundsoptimizationandcomparisonusingrsmccd AT garciacastelloesperanzam ultrasoundandmicrowaveassistedextractionofopuntiafruitpeelsbiocompoundsoptimizationandcomparisonusingrsmccd |