Cargando…

Progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation in polycystic ovarian syndrome: An RCT

BACKGROUND: In vitro fertilization is an important therapy for women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). The use of new ways of improving clinical results is yet required. OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed to investigate the efficacy of progesterone primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) and compare w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eftekhar, Maryam, Hoseini, Masrooreh, Saeed, Lida
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Knowledge E 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6804324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31646262
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v17i9.5103
_version_ 1783461165202931712
author Eftekhar, Maryam
Hoseini, Masrooreh
Saeed, Lida
author_facet Eftekhar, Maryam
Hoseini, Masrooreh
Saeed, Lida
author_sort Eftekhar, Maryam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In vitro fertilization is an important therapy for women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). The use of new ways of improving clinical results is yet required. OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed to investigate the efficacy of progesterone primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) and compare with conventional antagonist protocol in PCOS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 PCOS women who were candidates for assisted reproductive technology treatment from August to January 2019 were enrolled in this RCT and were placed into two groups, randomly (n= 60/each). The PPOS group received 20 mg /day Dydrogesterone orally since the second day of the cycle and the control group received antagonist protocol. The pregnancy outcomes including the chemical and clinical pregnancy, the miscarriage rate, and the percent of gestational sacs/ transferred embryos was compared in two groups. RESULTS: Number of MII oocyte, maturity rate, Number of 2 pronuclei (2PN) and serum estradiol levels on trigger day were statistically lower in PPOS group (p = 0.019, p = 0.035, p = 0.032, p = 0.030), respectively. Serum LH level on trigger day in PPOS group was higher than antagonist group (p = 0.005). Although there wasn’t sever ovarian hyper simulation syndrome in any participants, mild and moderate ovarian hyper simulation syndrome was less in PPOS group (p = 0.001). Also, the chemical and clinical pregnancy rate were higher in the antagonist group, althoughit was not statistically significant (p = 0.136, p = 0.093 respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrate that PPOS does not improve chemical and clinical pregnancy rate of the infertile women with PCOS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6804324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Knowledge E
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68043242019-10-23 Progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation in polycystic ovarian syndrome: An RCT Eftekhar, Maryam Hoseini, Masrooreh Saeed, Lida Int J Reprod Biomed Original Article BACKGROUND: In vitro fertilization is an important therapy for women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). The use of new ways of improving clinical results is yet required. OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed to investigate the efficacy of progesterone primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) and compare with conventional antagonist protocol in PCOS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 PCOS women who were candidates for assisted reproductive technology treatment from August to January 2019 were enrolled in this RCT and were placed into two groups, randomly (n= 60/each). The PPOS group received 20 mg /day Dydrogesterone orally since the second day of the cycle and the control group received antagonist protocol. The pregnancy outcomes including the chemical and clinical pregnancy, the miscarriage rate, and the percent of gestational sacs/ transferred embryos was compared in two groups. RESULTS: Number of MII oocyte, maturity rate, Number of 2 pronuclei (2PN) and serum estradiol levels on trigger day were statistically lower in PPOS group (p = 0.019, p = 0.035, p = 0.032, p = 0.030), respectively. Serum LH level on trigger day in PPOS group was higher than antagonist group (p = 0.005). Although there wasn’t sever ovarian hyper simulation syndrome in any participants, mild and moderate ovarian hyper simulation syndrome was less in PPOS group (p = 0.001). Also, the chemical and clinical pregnancy rate were higher in the antagonist group, althoughit was not statistically significant (p = 0.136, p = 0.093 respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrate that PPOS does not improve chemical and clinical pregnancy rate of the infertile women with PCOS. Knowledge E 2019-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6804324/ /pubmed/31646262 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v17i9.5103 Text en Copyright © 2019 Maryam Eftekhar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Eftekhar, Maryam
Hoseini, Masrooreh
Saeed, Lida
Progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation in polycystic ovarian syndrome: An RCT
title Progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation in polycystic ovarian syndrome: An RCT
title_full Progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation in polycystic ovarian syndrome: An RCT
title_fullStr Progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation in polycystic ovarian syndrome: An RCT
title_full_unstemmed Progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation in polycystic ovarian syndrome: An RCT
title_short Progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation in polycystic ovarian syndrome: An RCT
title_sort progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation in polycystic ovarian syndrome: an rct
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6804324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31646262
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v17i9.5103
work_keys_str_mv AT eftekharmaryam progesteroneprimedovarianstimulationinpolycysticovariansyndromeanrct
AT hoseinimasrooreh progesteroneprimedovarianstimulationinpolycysticovariansyndromeanrct
AT saeedlida progesteroneprimedovarianstimulationinpolycysticovariansyndromeanrct