Cargando…
No Difference in Outcome of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with “Bone–patellar Tendon-bone versus Semitendinosus-gracilis Graft with Preserved Insertion:” A Randomized Clinical Trial
BACKGROUND: The type of graft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is still a topic of debate and there is still no clear consensus on the ideal graft for ACL reconstruction. PURPOSE: This study was conducted to compare the outcome of ACL reconstruction surgery between hamstring tendo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6804384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673172 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_214_19 |
_version_ | 1783461179855732736 |
---|---|
author | Gupta, Ravi Kapoor, Anil Soni, Ashwani Khatri, Sourabh Masih, Gladson David Raghav, Mukta |
author_facet | Gupta, Ravi Kapoor, Anil Soni, Ashwani Khatri, Sourabh Masih, Gladson David Raghav, Mukta |
author_sort | Gupta, Ravi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The type of graft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is still a topic of debate and there is still no clear consensus on the ideal graft for ACL reconstruction. PURPOSE: This study was conducted to compare the outcome of ACL reconstruction surgery between hamstring tendon graft and bone–patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and sixty professional athletes were enrolled in the study. They were divided into two groups by computerized randomization. In Group I, ACL reconstruction was done using BPTB graft, and in Group II, ACL reconstruction was done using semitendinosus gracilis graft with preserved tibial insertion (STGPI). Postoperatively, patients were assessed for knee stability, Lysholm score, and WOMAC score. RESULTS: Mean KT-1000 side-to-side difference at 1 year was 2.31 ± 1.68 mm in BPTB cohort and 2.52 ± 1.6 mm in STGPI cohort (P = 0.4); and at 2 years, it was 1.98 ± 1.62 mm in BPTB cohort and 2.23 ± 1.6 mm in STGPI cohort (P = 0.4). Mean Lysholm score at 2 years was 96.1 ± 5.81 in STGPI cohort and 97.3 ± 4.62 in BPTB cohort (P = 0.15). Mean WOMAC score at 2 years was 3.3 ± 2.76 in STGPI cohort and 2.84 ± 2.21 in BPTB cohort (P = 0.25). Graft rupture rate was 3.75%; 3 patients in each group had graft rupture. Kneeling pain was present in 15% (12/80) of patients with BPTB graft whereas none of the patients in STGPI cohort had kneeling pain. CONCLUSION: There was no difference between two grafts in term of knee stability, visual analog scale score and functional outcome. However, hamstring tendon graft is associated with less donor site morbidity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6804384 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68043842019-11-01 No Difference in Outcome of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with “Bone–patellar Tendon-bone versus Semitendinosus-gracilis Graft with Preserved Insertion:” A Randomized Clinical Trial Gupta, Ravi Kapoor, Anil Soni, Ashwani Khatri, Sourabh Masih, Gladson David Raghav, Mukta Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: The type of graft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is still a topic of debate and there is still no clear consensus on the ideal graft for ACL reconstruction. PURPOSE: This study was conducted to compare the outcome of ACL reconstruction surgery between hamstring tendon graft and bone–patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and sixty professional athletes were enrolled in the study. They were divided into two groups by computerized randomization. In Group I, ACL reconstruction was done using BPTB graft, and in Group II, ACL reconstruction was done using semitendinosus gracilis graft with preserved tibial insertion (STGPI). Postoperatively, patients were assessed for knee stability, Lysholm score, and WOMAC score. RESULTS: Mean KT-1000 side-to-side difference at 1 year was 2.31 ± 1.68 mm in BPTB cohort and 2.52 ± 1.6 mm in STGPI cohort (P = 0.4); and at 2 years, it was 1.98 ± 1.62 mm in BPTB cohort and 2.23 ± 1.6 mm in STGPI cohort (P = 0.4). Mean Lysholm score at 2 years was 96.1 ± 5.81 in STGPI cohort and 97.3 ± 4.62 in BPTB cohort (P = 0.15). Mean WOMAC score at 2 years was 3.3 ± 2.76 in STGPI cohort and 2.84 ± 2.21 in BPTB cohort (P = 0.25). Graft rupture rate was 3.75%; 3 patients in each group had graft rupture. Kneeling pain was present in 15% (12/80) of patients with BPTB graft whereas none of the patients in STGPI cohort had kneeling pain. CONCLUSION: There was no difference between two grafts in term of knee stability, visual analog scale score and functional outcome. However, hamstring tendon graft is associated with less donor site morbidity. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6804384/ /pubmed/31673172 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_214_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gupta, Ravi Kapoor, Anil Soni, Ashwani Khatri, Sourabh Masih, Gladson David Raghav, Mukta No Difference in Outcome of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with “Bone–patellar Tendon-bone versus Semitendinosus-gracilis Graft with Preserved Insertion:” A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title | No Difference in Outcome of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with “Bone–patellar Tendon-bone versus Semitendinosus-gracilis Graft with Preserved Insertion:” A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full | No Difference in Outcome of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with “Bone–patellar Tendon-bone versus Semitendinosus-gracilis Graft with Preserved Insertion:” A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | No Difference in Outcome of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with “Bone–patellar Tendon-bone versus Semitendinosus-gracilis Graft with Preserved Insertion:” A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | No Difference in Outcome of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with “Bone–patellar Tendon-bone versus Semitendinosus-gracilis Graft with Preserved Insertion:” A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_short | No Difference in Outcome of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with “Bone–patellar Tendon-bone versus Semitendinosus-gracilis Graft with Preserved Insertion:” A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_sort | no difference in outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with “bone–patellar tendon-bone versus semitendinosus-gracilis graft with preserved insertion:” a randomized clinical trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6804384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673172 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_214_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guptaravi nodifferenceinoutcomeofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithbonepatellartendonboneversussemitendinosusgracilisgraftwithpreservedinsertionarandomizedclinicaltrial AT kapooranil nodifferenceinoutcomeofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithbonepatellartendonboneversussemitendinosusgracilisgraftwithpreservedinsertionarandomizedclinicaltrial AT soniashwani nodifferenceinoutcomeofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithbonepatellartendonboneversussemitendinosusgracilisgraftwithpreservedinsertionarandomizedclinicaltrial AT khatrisourabh nodifferenceinoutcomeofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithbonepatellartendonboneversussemitendinosusgracilisgraftwithpreservedinsertionarandomizedclinicaltrial AT masihgladsondavid nodifferenceinoutcomeofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithbonepatellartendonboneversussemitendinosusgracilisgraftwithpreservedinsertionarandomizedclinicaltrial AT raghavmukta nodifferenceinoutcomeofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithbonepatellartendonboneversussemitendinosusgracilisgraftwithpreservedinsertionarandomizedclinicaltrial |