Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of a global cognitive screen for Māori and non-Māori octogenarians

INTRODUCTION: We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the Modified Mini–Mental State Examination (3MS) in predicting dementia and cognitive impairment in Māori (indigenous people of New Zealand) and non-Māori octogenarians. METHODS: A subsample of participants from Life and Living in Advanced...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zawaly, Kristina, Moyes, Simon A., Wood, Phil C., Cheung, Gary, Rolleston, Anna, Buetow, Stephen, Tippett, Lynette, Kerse, Ngaire
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6804777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31650011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2019.08.006
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the Modified Mini–Mental State Examination (3MS) in predicting dementia and cognitive impairment in Māori (indigenous people of New Zealand) and non-Māori octogenarians. METHODS: A subsample of participants from Life and Living in Advanced Age: a Cohort Study in New Zealand were recruited to determine the 3MS diagnostic accuracy compared with the reference standard. RESULTS: Seventy-three participants (44% Māori) completed the 3MS and reference standard assessments. The 3MS demonstrated strong diagnostic accuracy to detect dementia with areas under the curve of 0.87 for Māori and 0.9 for non-Māori. Our cutoffs displayed ethnic variability and are approximately 5 points greater than those commonly applied. Cognitive impairment yielded low accuracy, and discriminatory power was not established. DISCUSSION: Cutoffs that are not age or ethnically appropriate may compromise the accuracy of cognitive screens. Consequently, older age and indigeneity increase the risk of mislabeled cognitive status.