Cargando…
Diagnostic accuracy of a global cognitive screen for Māori and non-Māori octogenarians
INTRODUCTION: We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the Modified Mini–Mental State Examination (3MS) in predicting dementia and cognitive impairment in Māori (indigenous people of New Zealand) and non-Māori octogenarians. METHODS: A subsample of participants from Life and Living in Advanced...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6804777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31650011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2019.08.006 |
Sumario: | INTRODUCTION: We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the Modified Mini–Mental State Examination (3MS) in predicting dementia and cognitive impairment in Māori (indigenous people of New Zealand) and non-Māori octogenarians. METHODS: A subsample of participants from Life and Living in Advanced Age: a Cohort Study in New Zealand were recruited to determine the 3MS diagnostic accuracy compared with the reference standard. RESULTS: Seventy-three participants (44% Māori) completed the 3MS and reference standard assessments. The 3MS demonstrated strong diagnostic accuracy to detect dementia with areas under the curve of 0.87 for Māori and 0.9 for non-Māori. Our cutoffs displayed ethnic variability and are approximately 5 points greater than those commonly applied. Cognitive impairment yielded low accuracy, and discriminatory power was not established. DISCUSSION: Cutoffs that are not age or ethnically appropriate may compromise the accuracy of cognitive screens. Consequently, older age and indigeneity increase the risk of mislabeled cognitive status. |
---|