Cargando…

2171: Satisfaction and perceptions of research participants in Clinical and Translational Studies

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The objectives of this study were (1) to examine research participant levels of satisfaction, experiences, and perceptions; and (2) to determine best practices for researchers for engaging research volunteers in clinical trials, and thereby reducing barriers to participatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Otado, Jane A., kwagyan, John, Ordor, Debra, Vittone, Sarah, Adler, Priscilla
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Cambridge University Press 2018
Materias:	Ethics
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6804929/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2017.190

Ejemplares similares

Satisfaction and perceptions of research participants in clinical and translational studies: An urban multi-institution with CTSA
por: Adler, Priscilla, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

4036 POSITIVE EXPERIENCE OF INFORMED CONSENT UNDERSTANDING AT A METROPOLITAN MULTI-INSTITUTIONS CTSA HUB
por: Otado, Jane Anyasa, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

2084: Knowledge, attitudes, and experiences towards genetic research among persons of African descent
por: Otado, Jane, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

190 Enhancing Research Ethics, Equity and Protections for Uninsured Study Participants
por: Pascalev, Assya, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

What potential research participants want to know about research: a systematic review
por: Kirkby, Helen Michelle, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Approaches to governance of participant-led research: a qualitative case study
por: Grant, Azure Dominique, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Developing informed consent materials for non-English-speaking participants: An analysis of four professional firm translations from English to Spanish
por: Brelsford, Kathleen Marie, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Informal professionalization of healthy participants in phase I clinical trials in Russia
por: Zvonareva, Olga, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Insurance in clinical research
por: Ghooi, Ravindra B., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Public reporting of clinical trial findings as an ethical responsibility to participants: a qualitative study
por: Morrow, Richard L, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Dissemination of trial results to participants in phase III pragmatic clinical trials: an audit of trial investigators intentions
por: Raza, M Zulfiqar, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Ethics of translational medical research
por: Mandal, Jharna, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Cross-sectional assessment of patient attitudes towards participation in clinical trials: does making results publicly available matter?
por: Jones, Christopher W, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

2171 Exploring the relationships between acculturation, discrimination and function in older African immigrants: A dissertation study
por: Nkimbeng, Manka, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

2530: Should all clinical research subjects pay the same?
por: McKinney, Bernadette
Publicado: (2018)

Self-directed multimedia process for delivering participant informed consent
por: Chapman, Niamh, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Acceptability of donor funding for clinical trials in the UK: a qualitative empirical ethics study using focus groups to elicit the views of research patient public involvement group members, research ethics committee chairs and clinical researchers
por: Shearman, Kirstie, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Informed consent in psychiatry clinical research: A conceptual review of issues, challenges, and recommendations
por: Gupta, Umesh Chandra, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Rapid commentary: Ethical implications for clinical trialists and patients associated with COVID-19 research
por: Delanerolle, Gayathri, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Ethical frameworks in clinical research processes during COVID-19: a scoping review
por: Kasherman, Lawrence, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Advance consent for participation in randomised controlled trials for emergency conditions: a scoping review
por: Niznick, Naomi, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Registration audit of clinical trials given a favourable opinion by UK research ethics committees
por: Denneny, Carla, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Advanced consent for participation in acute care randomised control trials: protocol for a scoping review
por: Niznick, Naomi, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Potential research participants support the return of raw sequence data
por: Middleton, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Readability and understandability of clinical research patient information leaflets and consent forms in Ireland and the UK: a retrospective quantitative analysis
por: O'Sullivan, Lydia, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Four reasons why too many informed consents to clinical research are invalid: a critical analysis of current practices
por: Wisgalla, Anne, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Survey on Perceptions of Indian Investigators on Research Ethics
por: Bindra, Sutinder, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Perspectives of Patients, Caregivers and Researchers on Research Priorities in Donation and Transplantation in Canada: A Pilot Workshop
por: Allard, Julie, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

2543: Participatory development of a CTSA-wide Community Advisory Board: Enhancing community engagement at the Michigan Institute for Clinical & Health Research
por: Delva, Jorge, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Money-oriented risk-takers or deliberate decision-makers: a cross-sectional survey study of participants in controlled human infection trials
por: Hoogerwerf, Marie-Astrid, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Approaches to consent in public health research in secondary schools
por: Bonell, Chris, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Enhancing fieldworkers’ performance management support in health research: an exploratory study on the views of field managers and fieldworkers from major research centres in Africa
por: Kombe, Francis Kazungu, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Evaluating a clinical ethics committee (CEC) implementation process in an oncological research hospital: protocol for a process evaluation study using normalisation process theory (EvaCEC)
por: Perin, Marta, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The Lived Experience Of Participants in an African RandomiseD trial (LEOPARD): protocol for an in-depth qualitative study within a multisite randomised controlled trial for HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis
por: Lawrence, David S, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Determining the level of data sharing, and number of publications, from research databases that have been given a favourable opinion by UK research ethics committees
por: Trace, Samantha, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

2533: Beyond “REACH”: The Research, Education, And Community Health (REACH) coalition as an exemplar for broad-based stakeholder engagement
por: Croisant, Sharon A., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Research ethics committees: Need for harmonization at the national level, the global and Indian perspective
por: Walanj, Aparna Sanjiv
Publicado: (2014)

Reconsidering ‘minimal risk’ to expand the repertoire of trials with waiver of informed consent for research
por: Monach, Paul A, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Evidence for stratified conflicts of interest policies in research contexts: a methodological review
por: Graham, S Scott, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

‘Adding another spinning plate to an already busy life’. Benefits and risks in patient partner–researcher relationships: a qualitative study of patient partners’ experiences in a Canadian health research setting
por: Leese, Jenny, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_ntoml19tc9ki3gkpc5uafsi58t