Cargando…
IMPlementing split Regimen OVEr Single dose using a Plan-Do-Study-Act approach (IMPROVES study)
Background and aims A split-dose regimen for colonoscopy is recommended by international guidelines, but its adoption is still suboptimal. Our aim was to assess whether a Plan-Do-Study-Act approach (PDSA), a scientific method promoting quality improvement, would be able to improve adherence to a sp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2019
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6805191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0996-8118 |
_version_ | 1783461325442121728 |
---|---|
author | Vanella, Giuseppe Hassan, Cesare De Bellis, Mario Giardini, Maxemiliano Grasso, Enrico Laterza, Francesco Tarantino, Ottaviano Di Giulio, Emilio |
author_facet | Vanella, Giuseppe Hassan, Cesare De Bellis, Mario Giardini, Maxemiliano Grasso, Enrico Laterza, Francesco Tarantino, Ottaviano Di Giulio, Emilio |
author_sort | Vanella, Giuseppe |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and aims A split-dose regimen for colonoscopy is recommended by international guidelines, but its adoption is still suboptimal. Our aim was to assess whether a Plan-Do-Study-Act approach (PDSA), a scientific method promoting quality improvement, would be able to improve adherence to a split-dose regimen, and to identify factors influencing its adoption. Methods This study consisted of three phases: Cycle 1: a cross-sectional assessment of split-dose adherence in consecutive outpatients/inpatients undergoing colonoscopies in 74 Italian centers; Educational intervention: regional meetings with literature review, analysis of Cycle 1 data, and discussion on corrective measures; local diffusion of educational material and tools for improvement; Cycle 2: reassessment of split-dose adherence after spontaneous local interventions. Demographic, clinical, and procedural variables were systematically collected. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of split-dose adoption. Results In total, 8213 patients (mean age = 60.29 years (SD = 13.58), men = 54 %, outpatients = 88.4 %) were enrolled between 2013 and 2016 (Cycle 1 = 4189 patients and Cycle 2 = 4024 patients). Split-dose adoption rose from 29.1 % in Cycle 1 to 51.1 % in Cycle 2 ( P < 0.0001), and being enrolled in Cycle 2 independently predicted split-dose adherence (OR = 2.9; 95 %CI 2.6 – 3.3). The adoption improved in all time slots, including colonoscopies scheduled before 0930. The main corrective measures were: rescheduling of colonoscopies after 0930 (between 0930 and 1130: OR = 2.6; 95 %CI 2.3 – 3.1; after 1130: OR = 7; 95 %CI 5.9 – 8.4); the cleansing regimen communicated by the Endoscopy unit (via form: OR = 1.6; 95 %CI 1.3 – 1.9; via visit: OR = 2.1; 95 %CI 1.7 – 2.5); a decrease in the use of deep sedation (OR = 2; 95 %CI 1.7 – 2.5). Conclusions An educational intervention with observation-driven corrections through a PDSA approach was able to substantially increase the adoption of a split-dose regimen. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6805191 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | © Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68051912019-11-01 IMPlementing split Regimen OVEr Single dose using a Plan-Do-Study-Act approach (IMPROVES study) Vanella, Giuseppe Hassan, Cesare De Bellis, Mario Giardini, Maxemiliano Grasso, Enrico Laterza, Francesco Tarantino, Ottaviano Di Giulio, Emilio Endosc Int Open Background and aims A split-dose regimen for colonoscopy is recommended by international guidelines, but its adoption is still suboptimal. Our aim was to assess whether a Plan-Do-Study-Act approach (PDSA), a scientific method promoting quality improvement, would be able to improve adherence to a split-dose regimen, and to identify factors influencing its adoption. Methods This study consisted of three phases: Cycle 1: a cross-sectional assessment of split-dose adherence in consecutive outpatients/inpatients undergoing colonoscopies in 74 Italian centers; Educational intervention: regional meetings with literature review, analysis of Cycle 1 data, and discussion on corrective measures; local diffusion of educational material and tools for improvement; Cycle 2: reassessment of split-dose adherence after spontaneous local interventions. Demographic, clinical, and procedural variables were systematically collected. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of split-dose adoption. Results In total, 8213 patients (mean age = 60.29 years (SD = 13.58), men = 54 %, outpatients = 88.4 %) were enrolled between 2013 and 2016 (Cycle 1 = 4189 patients and Cycle 2 = 4024 patients). Split-dose adoption rose from 29.1 % in Cycle 1 to 51.1 % in Cycle 2 ( P < 0.0001), and being enrolled in Cycle 2 independently predicted split-dose adherence (OR = 2.9; 95 %CI 2.6 – 3.3). The adoption improved in all time slots, including colonoscopies scheduled before 0930. The main corrective measures were: rescheduling of colonoscopies after 0930 (between 0930 and 1130: OR = 2.6; 95 %CI 2.3 – 3.1; after 1130: OR = 7; 95 %CI 5.9 – 8.4); the cleansing regimen communicated by the Endoscopy unit (via form: OR = 1.6; 95 %CI 1.3 – 1.9; via visit: OR = 2.1; 95 %CI 1.7 – 2.5); a decrease in the use of deep sedation (OR = 2; 95 %CI 1.7 – 2.5). Conclusions An educational intervention with observation-driven corrections through a PDSA approach was able to substantially increase the adoption of a split-dose regimen. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019-11 2019-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6805191/ /pubmed/31673618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0996-8118 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Vanella, Giuseppe Hassan, Cesare De Bellis, Mario Giardini, Maxemiliano Grasso, Enrico Laterza, Francesco Tarantino, Ottaviano Di Giulio, Emilio IMPlementing split Regimen OVEr Single dose using a Plan-Do-Study-Act approach (IMPROVES study) |
title | IMPlementing split Regimen OVEr Single dose using a Plan-Do-Study-Act approach (IMPROVES study) |
title_full | IMPlementing split Regimen OVEr Single dose using a Plan-Do-Study-Act approach (IMPROVES study) |
title_fullStr | IMPlementing split Regimen OVEr Single dose using a Plan-Do-Study-Act approach (IMPROVES study) |
title_full_unstemmed | IMPlementing split Regimen OVEr Single dose using a Plan-Do-Study-Act approach (IMPROVES study) |
title_short | IMPlementing split Regimen OVEr Single dose using a Plan-Do-Study-Act approach (IMPROVES study) |
title_sort | implementing split regimen over single dose using a plan-do-study-act approach (improves study) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6805191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0996-8118 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanellagiuseppe implementingsplitregimenoversingledoseusingaplandostudyactapproachimprovesstudy AT hassancesare implementingsplitregimenoversingledoseusingaplandostudyactapproachimprovesstudy AT debellismario implementingsplitregimenoversingledoseusingaplandostudyactapproachimprovesstudy AT giardinimaxemiliano implementingsplitregimenoversingledoseusingaplandostudyactapproachimprovesstudy AT grassoenrico implementingsplitregimenoversingledoseusingaplandostudyactapproachimprovesstudy AT laterzafrancesco implementingsplitregimenoversingledoseusingaplandostudyactapproachimprovesstudy AT tarantinoottaviano implementingsplitregimenoversingledoseusingaplandostudyactapproachimprovesstudy AT digiulioemilio implementingsplitregimenoversingledoseusingaplandostudyactapproachimprovesstudy |