Cargando…

Glottal Closure in Women with No Voice Complaints or Laryngeal Disorders

Introduction  The understanding of normal vocal production is essential to guide any voice professional as it is fundamental to understand the effects of the posterior glottal gap on the vocal quality. Objective  The aim of the present study was to verify the association between glottic closure, aco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cielo, Carla Aparecida, Schwarz, Karine, Finger, Leila Susana, Lima, Joziane Moraes, Christmann, Mara Keli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6805197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31649756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1676108
_version_ 1783461326912225280
author Cielo, Carla Aparecida
Schwarz, Karine
Finger, Leila Susana
Lima, Joziane Moraes
Christmann, Mara Keli
author_facet Cielo, Carla Aparecida
Schwarz, Karine
Finger, Leila Susana
Lima, Joziane Moraes
Christmann, Mara Keli
author_sort Cielo, Carla Aparecida
collection PubMed
description Introduction  The understanding of normal vocal production is essential to guide any voice professional as it is fundamental to understand the effects of the posterior glottal gap on the vocal quality. Objective  The aim of the present study was to verify the association between glottic closure, acoustic parameters, and some characteristics of the videolaryngostroboscopy of young women without vocal complaints nor laryngeal disorders. Methods  This is a cross-sectional study with 56 women between 20 and 30 years old who underwent videolaryngostroboscopy. The acoustic parameters of the vowel /a:/ were analyzed using the Praat software, Release 4.6.10 (Paul Boersman and David Weenik, Amsterdam, Netherlands). Statistical Analysis  The chi-squared, Fischer, and Kruskall-Wallis tests were applied, with 5% significance. Results  Significant occurrence of posterior glottal gap (85.71%, p  < 0.001), of normal vocal folds vibration amplitude (82.14%, p  < 0.001), and of absence of significant constriction of the laryngeal vestibule (98.21%, p  < 0.001); no significant association of the glottic closure with the vocal acoustic parameters; no significant association of glottic closure, vocal folds vibration amplitude, and constriction of the laryngeal vestibule. Conclusion  There was a predominance of posterior glottal gap, normal vocal folds vibration amplitude, and absence of laryngeal vestibule constriction, and no relation with the acoustic parameters, suggesting that the posterior glottal gap did not generate impact on the vocal production of the young adult women studied.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6805197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68051972019-10-24 Glottal Closure in Women with No Voice Complaints or Laryngeal Disorders Cielo, Carla Aparecida Schwarz, Karine Finger, Leila Susana Lima, Joziane Moraes Christmann, Mara Keli Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Introduction  The understanding of normal vocal production is essential to guide any voice professional as it is fundamental to understand the effects of the posterior glottal gap on the vocal quality. Objective  The aim of the present study was to verify the association between glottic closure, acoustic parameters, and some characteristics of the videolaryngostroboscopy of young women without vocal complaints nor laryngeal disorders. Methods  This is a cross-sectional study with 56 women between 20 and 30 years old who underwent videolaryngostroboscopy. The acoustic parameters of the vowel /a:/ were analyzed using the Praat software, Release 4.6.10 (Paul Boersman and David Weenik, Amsterdam, Netherlands). Statistical Analysis  The chi-squared, Fischer, and Kruskall-Wallis tests were applied, with 5% significance. Results  Significant occurrence of posterior glottal gap (85.71%, p  < 0.001), of normal vocal folds vibration amplitude (82.14%, p  < 0.001), and of absence of significant constriction of the laryngeal vestibule (98.21%, p  < 0.001); no significant association of the glottic closure with the vocal acoustic parameters; no significant association of glottic closure, vocal folds vibration amplitude, and constriction of the laryngeal vestibule. Conclusion  There was a predominance of posterior glottal gap, normal vocal folds vibration amplitude, and absence of laryngeal vestibule constriction, and no relation with the acoustic parameters, suggesting that the posterior glottal gap did not generate impact on the vocal production of the young adult women studied. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2019-10 2019-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6805197/ /pubmed/31649756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1676108 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cielo, Carla Aparecida
Schwarz, Karine
Finger, Leila Susana
Lima, Joziane Moraes
Christmann, Mara Keli
Glottal Closure in Women with No Voice Complaints or Laryngeal Disorders
title Glottal Closure in Women with No Voice Complaints or Laryngeal Disorders
title_full Glottal Closure in Women with No Voice Complaints or Laryngeal Disorders
title_fullStr Glottal Closure in Women with No Voice Complaints or Laryngeal Disorders
title_full_unstemmed Glottal Closure in Women with No Voice Complaints or Laryngeal Disorders
title_short Glottal Closure in Women with No Voice Complaints or Laryngeal Disorders
title_sort glottal closure in women with no voice complaints or laryngeal disorders
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6805197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31649756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1676108
work_keys_str_mv AT cielocarlaaparecida glottalclosureinwomenwithnovoicecomplaintsorlaryngealdisorders
AT schwarzkarine glottalclosureinwomenwithnovoicecomplaintsorlaryngealdisorders
AT fingerleilasusana glottalclosureinwomenwithnovoicecomplaintsorlaryngealdisorders
AT limajozianemoraes glottalclosureinwomenwithnovoicecomplaintsorlaryngealdisorders
AT christmannmarakeli glottalclosureinwomenwithnovoicecomplaintsorlaryngealdisorders