Analytical comparison between two hematological analyzer systems: Mindray BC‐5180 vs Sysmex XN‐1000

BACKGROUND: To compare the Mindray BC‐5180 and Sysmex XN‐1000 instruments by analyzing the results of complete blood count in the external quality assessment in Shandong Province in 2018. METHODS: In the external quality assessment, 10 batches of quality control materials were issued throughout the year. The test items were WBC, RBC, Hb, PLT, and HCT. The laboratories using Mindray BC‐5180 and Sysmex XN‐1000 were screened, and the results were analyzed by t test, Passing‐Bablok regression analysis, and Bland‐Altman analysis. RESULTS: Thirty‐six laboratories using Mindray BC‐5180 instruments and thirty‐six laboratories using Sysmex XN‐1000 instruments were screened, and the average difference between the two instruments results is not significant (P > 0.05, t test). Passing‐Bablok regression analysis showed that the 95% confidence interval of the regression equation interception of each test item included 0, and the 95% confidence interval of the slope contained 1, r > 0.98, which showed that the correlation is good. The Bland‐Altman analysis showed that both instruments had more than 95% of the points within the 95% consistency limit (WBC97.2%, RBC95.6%, PLT97.2%, Hb96.7%, HCT97.5%). Within the consistency limit, the absolute value of the difference between the Mindray BC‐5180 instrument and the Sysmex XN‐1000 instrument is WBC 0.14%, RBC 0.26%, PLT 2.7%, and Hb 1.9%. HCT is 0.69%, and the difference is clinically acceptable. CONCLUSION: It can be considered that the two instruments have good correlation and consistency, and the two instruments can replace each other.