Cargando…

Comparison of conventional and Si-photomultiplier-based PET systems for image quality and diagnostic performance

BACKGROUND: A new generation of positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT) was recently introduced using silicon (Si) photomultiplier (PM)-based technology. Our aim was to compare the image quality and diagnostic performance of a SiPM-based PET-CT (Discovery MI; GE Healthcare, Mi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oddstig, Jenny, Leide Svegborn, Sigrid, Almquist, Helen, Bitzén, Ulrika, Garpered, Sabine, Hedeer, Fredrik, Hindorf, Cecilia, Jögi, Jonas, Jönsson, Lena, Minarik, David, Petersson, Richard, Welinder, Annika, Wollmer, Per, Trägårdh, Elin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6805299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31640584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0377-6
_version_ 1783461349708267520
author Oddstig, Jenny
Leide Svegborn, Sigrid
Almquist, Helen
Bitzén, Ulrika
Garpered, Sabine
Hedeer, Fredrik
Hindorf, Cecilia
Jögi, Jonas
Jönsson, Lena
Minarik, David
Petersson, Richard
Welinder, Annika
Wollmer, Per
Trägårdh, Elin
author_facet Oddstig, Jenny
Leide Svegborn, Sigrid
Almquist, Helen
Bitzén, Ulrika
Garpered, Sabine
Hedeer, Fredrik
Hindorf, Cecilia
Jögi, Jonas
Jönsson, Lena
Minarik, David
Petersson, Richard
Welinder, Annika
Wollmer, Per
Trägårdh, Elin
author_sort Oddstig, Jenny
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A new generation of positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT) was recently introduced using silicon (Si) photomultiplier (PM)-based technology. Our aim was to compare the image quality and diagnostic performance of a SiPM-based PET-CT (Discovery MI; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) with a time-of-flight PET-CT scanner with a conventional PM detector (Gemini TF; Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, OH, USA), including reconstruction algorithms per vendor’s recommendations. METHODS: Imaging of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association IEC body phantom and 16 patients was carried out using 1.5 min/bed for the Discovery MI PET-CT and 2 min/bed for the Gemini TF PET-CT. Images were analysed for recovery coefficients for the phantom, signal-to-noise ratio in the liver, standardized uptake values (SUV) in lesions, number of lesions and metabolic TNM classifications in patients. RESULTS: In phantom, the correct (> 90%) activity level was measured for spheres ≥17 mm for Discovery MI, whereas the Gemini TF reached a correct measured activity level for the 37-mm sphere. In patient studies, metabolic TNM classification was worse using images obtained from the Discovery MI compared those obtained from the Gemini TF in 4 of 15 patients. A trend toward more malignant, inflammatory and unclear lesions was found using images acquired with the Discovery MI compared with the Gemini TF, but this was not statistically significant. Lesion-to-blood-pool SUV ratios were significantly higher in images from the Discovery MI compared with the Gemini TF for lesions smaller than 1 cm (p < 0.001), but this was not the case for larger lesions (p = 0.053). The signal-to-noise ratio in the liver was similar between platforms (p = 0.52). Also, shorter acquisition times were possible using the Discovery MI, with preserved signal-to-noise ratio in the liver. CONCLUSIONS: Image quality was better with Discovery MI compared to conventional Gemini TF. Although no gold standard was available, the results indicate that the new PET-CT generation will provide potentially better diagnostic performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6805299
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68052992019-10-24 Comparison of conventional and Si-photomultiplier-based PET systems for image quality and diagnostic performance Oddstig, Jenny Leide Svegborn, Sigrid Almquist, Helen Bitzén, Ulrika Garpered, Sabine Hedeer, Fredrik Hindorf, Cecilia Jögi, Jonas Jönsson, Lena Minarik, David Petersson, Richard Welinder, Annika Wollmer, Per Trägårdh, Elin BMC Med Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: A new generation of positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT) was recently introduced using silicon (Si) photomultiplier (PM)-based technology. Our aim was to compare the image quality and diagnostic performance of a SiPM-based PET-CT (Discovery MI; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) with a time-of-flight PET-CT scanner with a conventional PM detector (Gemini TF; Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, OH, USA), including reconstruction algorithms per vendor’s recommendations. METHODS: Imaging of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association IEC body phantom and 16 patients was carried out using 1.5 min/bed for the Discovery MI PET-CT and 2 min/bed for the Gemini TF PET-CT. Images were analysed for recovery coefficients for the phantom, signal-to-noise ratio in the liver, standardized uptake values (SUV) in lesions, number of lesions and metabolic TNM classifications in patients. RESULTS: In phantom, the correct (> 90%) activity level was measured for spheres ≥17 mm for Discovery MI, whereas the Gemini TF reached a correct measured activity level for the 37-mm sphere. In patient studies, metabolic TNM classification was worse using images obtained from the Discovery MI compared those obtained from the Gemini TF in 4 of 15 patients. A trend toward more malignant, inflammatory and unclear lesions was found using images acquired with the Discovery MI compared with the Gemini TF, but this was not statistically significant. Lesion-to-blood-pool SUV ratios were significantly higher in images from the Discovery MI compared with the Gemini TF for lesions smaller than 1 cm (p < 0.001), but this was not the case for larger lesions (p = 0.053). The signal-to-noise ratio in the liver was similar between platforms (p = 0.52). Also, shorter acquisition times were possible using the Discovery MI, with preserved signal-to-noise ratio in the liver. CONCLUSIONS: Image quality was better with Discovery MI compared to conventional Gemini TF. Although no gold standard was available, the results indicate that the new PET-CT generation will provide potentially better diagnostic performance. BioMed Central 2019-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6805299/ /pubmed/31640584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0377-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Oddstig, Jenny
Leide Svegborn, Sigrid
Almquist, Helen
Bitzén, Ulrika
Garpered, Sabine
Hedeer, Fredrik
Hindorf, Cecilia
Jögi, Jonas
Jönsson, Lena
Minarik, David
Petersson, Richard
Welinder, Annika
Wollmer, Per
Trägårdh, Elin
Comparison of conventional and Si-photomultiplier-based PET systems for image quality and diagnostic performance
title Comparison of conventional and Si-photomultiplier-based PET systems for image quality and diagnostic performance
title_full Comparison of conventional and Si-photomultiplier-based PET systems for image quality and diagnostic performance
title_fullStr Comparison of conventional and Si-photomultiplier-based PET systems for image quality and diagnostic performance
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of conventional and Si-photomultiplier-based PET systems for image quality and diagnostic performance
title_short Comparison of conventional and Si-photomultiplier-based PET systems for image quality and diagnostic performance
title_sort comparison of conventional and si-photomultiplier-based pet systems for image quality and diagnostic performance
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6805299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31640584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0377-6
work_keys_str_mv AT oddstigjenny comparisonofconventionalandsiphotomultiplierbasedpetsystemsforimagequalityanddiagnosticperformance
AT leidesvegbornsigrid comparisonofconventionalandsiphotomultiplierbasedpetsystemsforimagequalityanddiagnosticperformance
AT almquisthelen comparisonofconventionalandsiphotomultiplierbasedpetsystemsforimagequalityanddiagnosticperformance
AT bitzenulrika comparisonofconventionalandsiphotomultiplierbasedpetsystemsforimagequalityanddiagnosticperformance
AT garperedsabine comparisonofconventionalandsiphotomultiplierbasedpetsystemsforimagequalityanddiagnosticperformance
AT hedeerfredrik comparisonofconventionalandsiphotomultiplierbasedpetsystemsforimagequalityanddiagnosticperformance
AT hindorfcecilia comparisonofconventionalandsiphotomultiplierbasedpetsystemsforimagequalityanddiagnosticperformance
AT jogijonas comparisonofconventionalandsiphotomultiplierbasedpetsystemsforimagequalityanddiagnosticperformance
AT jonssonlena comparisonofconventionalandsiphotomultiplierbasedpetsystemsforimagequalityanddiagnosticperformance
AT minarikdavid comparisonofconventionalandsiphotomultiplierbasedpetsystemsforimagequalityanddiagnosticperformance
AT peterssonrichard comparisonofconventionalandsiphotomultiplierbasedpetsystemsforimagequalityanddiagnosticperformance
AT welinderannika comparisonofconventionalandsiphotomultiplierbasedpetsystemsforimagequalityanddiagnosticperformance
AT wollmerper comparisonofconventionalandsiphotomultiplierbasedpetsystemsforimagequalityanddiagnosticperformance
AT tragardhelin comparisonofconventionalandsiphotomultiplierbasedpetsystemsforimagequalityanddiagnosticperformance