Cargando…
Effects of eating with an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback on eating rate and body weight: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Eating rate is a basic determinant of appetite regulation: people who eat more slowly feel sated earlier and eat less. A high eating rate contributes to overeating and potentially to weight gain. Previous studies showed that an augmented fork that delivers real-time feedback on eating ra...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6805487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31640791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0857-7 |
_version_ | 1783461396577517568 |
---|---|
author | Hermsen, Sander Mars, Monica Higgs, Suzanne Frost, Jeana H. Hermans, Roel C. J. |
author_facet | Hermsen, Sander Mars, Monica Higgs, Suzanne Frost, Jeana H. Hermans, Roel C. J. |
author_sort | Hermsen, Sander |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Eating rate is a basic determinant of appetite regulation: people who eat more slowly feel sated earlier and eat less. A high eating rate contributes to overeating and potentially to weight gain. Previous studies showed that an augmented fork that delivers real-time feedback on eating rate is a potentially effective intervention to decrease eating rate in naturalistic settings. This study assessed the impact of using the augmented fork during a 15-week period on eating rate and body weight. METHODS: In a parallel randomized controlled trial, 141 participants with overweight (age: 49.2 ± 12.3 y; BMI: 31.5 ± 4.48 kg/m2) were randomized to intervention groups (VFC, n = 51 or VFC+, n = 44) or control group (NFC, n = 46). First, we measured bite rate and success ratio on five consecutive days with the augmented fork without feedback (T1). The intervention groups (VFC, VFC+) then used the same fork, but now received vibrotactile feedback when they ate more than one bite per 10 s. Participants in VFC+ had additional access to a web portal with visual feedback. In the control group (NFC), participants ate with the fork without either feedback. The intervention period lasted four weeks, followed by a week of measurements only (T2) and another measurement week after eight weeks (T3). Body weight was assessed at T1, T2, and T3. RESULTS: Participants in VFC and VFC+ had a lower bite rate (p < .01) and higher success ratio (p < .0001) than those in NFC at T2. This effect persisted at T3. In both intervention groups participants lost more weight than those in the control group at T2 (p < .02), with no rebound at T3. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study indicate that an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback is a viable tool to reduce eating rate in naturalistic settings. Further investigation may confirm that the augmented fork could support long-term weight loss strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The research reported in this manuscript was registered on 4 November 2015 in the Netherlands Trial Register with number NL5432 (https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/5432). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6805487 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68054872019-10-24 Effects of eating with an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback on eating rate and body weight: a randomized controlled trial Hermsen, Sander Mars, Monica Higgs, Suzanne Frost, Jeana H. Hermans, Roel C. J. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Eating rate is a basic determinant of appetite regulation: people who eat more slowly feel sated earlier and eat less. A high eating rate contributes to overeating and potentially to weight gain. Previous studies showed that an augmented fork that delivers real-time feedback on eating rate is a potentially effective intervention to decrease eating rate in naturalistic settings. This study assessed the impact of using the augmented fork during a 15-week period on eating rate and body weight. METHODS: In a parallel randomized controlled trial, 141 participants with overweight (age: 49.2 ± 12.3 y; BMI: 31.5 ± 4.48 kg/m2) were randomized to intervention groups (VFC, n = 51 or VFC+, n = 44) or control group (NFC, n = 46). First, we measured bite rate and success ratio on five consecutive days with the augmented fork without feedback (T1). The intervention groups (VFC, VFC+) then used the same fork, but now received vibrotactile feedback when they ate more than one bite per 10 s. Participants in VFC+ had additional access to a web portal with visual feedback. In the control group (NFC), participants ate with the fork without either feedback. The intervention period lasted four weeks, followed by a week of measurements only (T2) and another measurement week after eight weeks (T3). Body weight was assessed at T1, T2, and T3. RESULTS: Participants in VFC and VFC+ had a lower bite rate (p < .01) and higher success ratio (p < .0001) than those in NFC at T2. This effect persisted at T3. In both intervention groups participants lost more weight than those in the control group at T2 (p < .02), with no rebound at T3. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study indicate that an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback is a viable tool to reduce eating rate in naturalistic settings. Further investigation may confirm that the augmented fork could support long-term weight loss strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The research reported in this manuscript was registered on 4 November 2015 in the Netherlands Trial Register with number NL5432 (https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/5432). BioMed Central 2019-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6805487/ /pubmed/31640791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0857-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Hermsen, Sander Mars, Monica Higgs, Suzanne Frost, Jeana H. Hermans, Roel C. J. Effects of eating with an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback on eating rate and body weight: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Effects of eating with an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback on eating rate and body weight: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Effects of eating with an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback on eating rate and body weight: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Effects of eating with an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback on eating rate and body weight: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of eating with an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback on eating rate and body weight: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Effects of eating with an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback on eating rate and body weight: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | effects of eating with an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback on eating rate and body weight: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6805487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31640791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0857-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hermsensander effectsofeatingwithanaugmentedforkwithvibrotactilefeedbackoneatingrateandbodyweightarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT marsmonica effectsofeatingwithanaugmentedforkwithvibrotactilefeedbackoneatingrateandbodyweightarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT higgssuzanne effectsofeatingwithanaugmentedforkwithvibrotactilefeedbackoneatingrateandbodyweightarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT frostjeanah effectsofeatingwithanaugmentedforkwithvibrotactilefeedbackoneatingrateandbodyweightarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hermansroelcj effectsofeatingwithanaugmentedforkwithvibrotactilefeedbackoneatingrateandbodyweightarandomizedcontrolledtrial |