Cargando…

Effects of eating with an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback on eating rate and body weight: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Eating rate is a basic determinant of appetite regulation: people who eat more slowly feel sated earlier and eat less. A high eating rate contributes to overeating and potentially to weight gain. Previous studies showed that an augmented fork that delivers real-time feedback on eating ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hermsen, Sander, Mars, Monica, Higgs, Suzanne, Frost, Jeana H., Hermans, Roel C. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6805487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31640791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0857-7
_version_ 1783461396577517568
author Hermsen, Sander
Mars, Monica
Higgs, Suzanne
Frost, Jeana H.
Hermans, Roel C. J.
author_facet Hermsen, Sander
Mars, Monica
Higgs, Suzanne
Frost, Jeana H.
Hermans, Roel C. J.
author_sort Hermsen, Sander
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Eating rate is a basic determinant of appetite regulation: people who eat more slowly feel sated earlier and eat less. A high eating rate contributes to overeating and potentially to weight gain. Previous studies showed that an augmented fork that delivers real-time feedback on eating rate is a potentially effective intervention to decrease eating rate in naturalistic settings. This study assessed the impact of using the augmented fork during a 15-week period on eating rate and body weight. METHODS: In a parallel randomized controlled trial, 141 participants with overweight (age: 49.2 ± 12.3 y; BMI: 31.5 ± 4.48 kg/m2) were randomized to intervention groups (VFC, n = 51 or VFC+, n = 44) or control group (NFC, n = 46). First, we measured bite rate and success ratio on five consecutive days with the augmented fork without feedback (T1). The intervention groups (VFC, VFC+) then used the same fork, but now received vibrotactile feedback when they ate more than one bite per 10 s. Participants in VFC+ had additional access to a web portal with visual feedback. In the control group (NFC), participants ate with the fork without either feedback. The intervention period lasted four weeks, followed by a week of measurements only (T2) and another measurement week after eight weeks (T3). Body weight was assessed at T1, T2, and T3. RESULTS: Participants in VFC and VFC+ had a lower bite rate (p < .01) and higher success ratio (p < .0001) than those in NFC at T2. This effect persisted at T3. In both intervention groups participants lost more weight than those in the control group at T2 (p < .02), with no rebound at T3. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study indicate that an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback is a viable tool to reduce eating rate in naturalistic settings. Further investigation may confirm that the augmented fork could support long-term weight loss strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The research reported in this manuscript was registered on 4 November 2015 in the Netherlands Trial Register with number NL5432 (https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/5432).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6805487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68054872019-10-24 Effects of eating with an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback on eating rate and body weight: a randomized controlled trial Hermsen, Sander Mars, Monica Higgs, Suzanne Frost, Jeana H. Hermans, Roel C. J. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Eating rate is a basic determinant of appetite regulation: people who eat more slowly feel sated earlier and eat less. A high eating rate contributes to overeating and potentially to weight gain. Previous studies showed that an augmented fork that delivers real-time feedback on eating rate is a potentially effective intervention to decrease eating rate in naturalistic settings. This study assessed the impact of using the augmented fork during a 15-week period on eating rate and body weight. METHODS: In a parallel randomized controlled trial, 141 participants with overweight (age: 49.2 ± 12.3 y; BMI: 31.5 ± 4.48 kg/m2) were randomized to intervention groups (VFC, n = 51 or VFC+, n = 44) or control group (NFC, n = 46). First, we measured bite rate and success ratio on five consecutive days with the augmented fork without feedback (T1). The intervention groups (VFC, VFC+) then used the same fork, but now received vibrotactile feedback when they ate more than one bite per 10 s. Participants in VFC+ had additional access to a web portal with visual feedback. In the control group (NFC), participants ate with the fork without either feedback. The intervention period lasted four weeks, followed by a week of measurements only (T2) and another measurement week after eight weeks (T3). Body weight was assessed at T1, T2, and T3. RESULTS: Participants in VFC and VFC+ had a lower bite rate (p < .01) and higher success ratio (p < .0001) than those in NFC at T2. This effect persisted at T3. In both intervention groups participants lost more weight than those in the control group at T2 (p < .02), with no rebound at T3. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study indicate that an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback is a viable tool to reduce eating rate in naturalistic settings. Further investigation may confirm that the augmented fork could support long-term weight loss strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The research reported in this manuscript was registered on 4 November 2015 in the Netherlands Trial Register with number NL5432 (https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/5432). BioMed Central 2019-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6805487/ /pubmed/31640791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0857-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hermsen, Sander
Mars, Monica
Higgs, Suzanne
Frost, Jeana H.
Hermans, Roel C. J.
Effects of eating with an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback on eating rate and body weight: a randomized controlled trial
title Effects of eating with an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback on eating rate and body weight: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Effects of eating with an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback on eating rate and body weight: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Effects of eating with an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback on eating rate and body weight: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of eating with an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback on eating rate and body weight: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Effects of eating with an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback on eating rate and body weight: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort effects of eating with an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback on eating rate and body weight: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6805487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31640791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0857-7
work_keys_str_mv AT hermsensander effectsofeatingwithanaugmentedforkwithvibrotactilefeedbackoneatingrateandbodyweightarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT marsmonica effectsofeatingwithanaugmentedforkwithvibrotactilefeedbackoneatingrateandbodyweightarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT higgssuzanne effectsofeatingwithanaugmentedforkwithvibrotactilefeedbackoneatingrateandbodyweightarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT frostjeanah effectsofeatingwithanaugmentedforkwithvibrotactilefeedbackoneatingrateandbodyweightarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hermansroelcj effectsofeatingwithanaugmentedforkwithvibrotactilefeedbackoneatingrateandbodyweightarandomizedcontrolledtrial