Cargando…

Protective practices against tick bites in Denmark, Norway and Sweden: a questionnaire-based study

BACKGROUND: Tick-borne infections are of emerging and increasing concern in the Scandinavian countries Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Only few studies have investigated protective practices against tick bites in the general population. The aim of this multi-country study was to assess the use of protec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jepsen, Martin Tugwell, Jokelainen, Pikka, Jore, Solveig, Boman, Anders, Slunge, Daniel, Krogfelt, Karen Angeliki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6805683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31640665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7613-4
_version_ 1783461449354444800
author Jepsen, Martin Tugwell
Jokelainen, Pikka
Jore, Solveig
Boman, Anders
Slunge, Daniel
Krogfelt, Karen Angeliki
author_facet Jepsen, Martin Tugwell
Jokelainen, Pikka
Jore, Solveig
Boman, Anders
Slunge, Daniel
Krogfelt, Karen Angeliki
author_sort Jepsen, Martin Tugwell
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tick-borne infections are of emerging and increasing concern in the Scandinavian countries Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Only few studies have investigated protective practices against tick bites in the general population. The aim of this multi-country study was to assess the use of protective practices and the perception of the efficacy of them. METHODS: We surveyed the extent of using protective practices against tick bites, using the same questionnaire in three local languages. In addition, we surveyed perceptions of how good a protection the different practices provide. Altogether 783 individuals from Denmark, 789 from Norway and 1096 from Sweden participated in the study by completing an extensive online questionnaire in October 2016. RESULTS: Altogether 1011 respondents (37.9%) reported using at least three different protective practices either often or always when in areas where there are ticks, while 522 (19.6%) reported using none. Female gender was among the factors identified as positively associated with using several of the specific practices often or always when in areas where there are ticks. The gender-difference in extent of using protective practices against tick bites was particularly pronounced in Sweden. Based on a multivariable logistic regression model, being female, being from Sweden, and having experienced one or more tick bites were positively associated with using at least three different protective practices against tick bites either often or always when in areas where there are ticks (odds ratios 1.90, 1.87 and 1.88, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study, especially the observed differences by country and by gender, can be useful in targeting future information to the public. In particular, our results suggest that men across all ages should be considered a specific target group for this information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6805683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68056832019-10-24 Protective practices against tick bites in Denmark, Norway and Sweden: a questionnaire-based study Jepsen, Martin Tugwell Jokelainen, Pikka Jore, Solveig Boman, Anders Slunge, Daniel Krogfelt, Karen Angeliki BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Tick-borne infections are of emerging and increasing concern in the Scandinavian countries Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Only few studies have investigated protective practices against tick bites in the general population. The aim of this multi-country study was to assess the use of protective practices and the perception of the efficacy of them. METHODS: We surveyed the extent of using protective practices against tick bites, using the same questionnaire in three local languages. In addition, we surveyed perceptions of how good a protection the different practices provide. Altogether 783 individuals from Denmark, 789 from Norway and 1096 from Sweden participated in the study by completing an extensive online questionnaire in October 2016. RESULTS: Altogether 1011 respondents (37.9%) reported using at least three different protective practices either often or always when in areas where there are ticks, while 522 (19.6%) reported using none. Female gender was among the factors identified as positively associated with using several of the specific practices often or always when in areas where there are ticks. The gender-difference in extent of using protective practices against tick bites was particularly pronounced in Sweden. Based on a multivariable logistic regression model, being female, being from Sweden, and having experienced one or more tick bites were positively associated with using at least three different protective practices against tick bites either often or always when in areas where there are ticks (odds ratios 1.90, 1.87 and 1.88, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study, especially the observed differences by country and by gender, can be useful in targeting future information to the public. In particular, our results suggest that men across all ages should be considered a specific target group for this information. BioMed Central 2019-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6805683/ /pubmed/31640665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7613-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jepsen, Martin Tugwell
Jokelainen, Pikka
Jore, Solveig
Boman, Anders
Slunge, Daniel
Krogfelt, Karen Angeliki
Protective practices against tick bites in Denmark, Norway and Sweden: a questionnaire-based study
title Protective practices against tick bites in Denmark, Norway and Sweden: a questionnaire-based study
title_full Protective practices against tick bites in Denmark, Norway and Sweden: a questionnaire-based study
title_fullStr Protective practices against tick bites in Denmark, Norway and Sweden: a questionnaire-based study
title_full_unstemmed Protective practices against tick bites in Denmark, Norway and Sweden: a questionnaire-based study
title_short Protective practices against tick bites in Denmark, Norway and Sweden: a questionnaire-based study
title_sort protective practices against tick bites in denmark, norway and sweden: a questionnaire-based study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6805683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31640665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7613-4
work_keys_str_mv AT jepsenmartintugwell protectivepracticesagainsttickbitesindenmarknorwayandswedenaquestionnairebasedstudy
AT jokelainenpikka protectivepracticesagainsttickbitesindenmarknorwayandswedenaquestionnairebasedstudy
AT joresolveig protectivepracticesagainsttickbitesindenmarknorwayandswedenaquestionnairebasedstudy
AT bomananders protectivepracticesagainsttickbitesindenmarknorwayandswedenaquestionnairebasedstudy
AT slungedaniel protectivepracticesagainsttickbitesindenmarknorwayandswedenaquestionnairebasedstudy
AT krogfeltkarenangeliki protectivepracticesagainsttickbitesindenmarknorwayandswedenaquestionnairebasedstudy