Cargando…

Emerging nursing scholars guide to peer reviewing an academic manuscript

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Oerther, Sarah, Watson, Roger
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:	Editorial
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6805707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31660154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.368

Ejemplares similares

Novelty: Nursing scholars’ guide for successful publication
por: Gunawan, Joko, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Peer review processes and related issues in scholarly journals
por: Saeidnia, Soodabeh, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

JoGH policy on the use of artificial intelligence in scholarly manuscripts
por: Marušić, Ana
Publicado: (2023)

The ethical challenges of antimicrobial resistance for Nurse practitioners
por: Oerther, Sarah, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The Peer Review Process: Underwriting Manuscript Quality & Validity
por: Santini, Ario
Publicado: (2018)

Antimicrobial resistance needs to be combated at primary levels of prevention by nurses
por: Oerther, Sarah, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Systematic review of the effectiveness of training programs in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, and manuscript peer review (protocol)
por: Galipeau, James, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Peer Review of Manuscripts Submitted Via the Academy Fellowship Track
por: Casadevall, Arturo, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

mSphereDirect: Author-Initiated Peer Review of Manuscripts
por: Imperiale, Michael J., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
por: Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Publicado: (2018)

Gender bias in scholarly peer review
por: Helmer, Markus, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

A Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Article
por: Jandrić, Petar
Publicado: (2020)

How many manuscripts should I peer review per year?
por: Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Peer Review in Scholarly Biomedical Journals: a Few Things that Make a Big Difference
por: Gasparyan, Armen Yuri
Publicado: (2013)

Is open peer review, a growing trend in scholarly publishing, a double-edged sword?
por: Park, Joo-Young
Publicado: (2020)

The Korean Journal of Radiology Launches an Online Manuscript Submission and Tracking System for Peer Review
por: Cheon, Jung-Eun, et al.
Publicado: (2005)

How do we improve peer review for manuscripts from culturally divergent origins?
por: Dart, Anthony
Publicado: (2015)

Natasha R. Magson Receives Emerging Scholar Best Article Award, 2022
por: Levesque, Roger J. R.
Publicado: (2022)

Editorial: Addressing the persistent epidemic of violence against nurses
por: Oerther, Sarah, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Fundamentals of Scholarly Peer Review: A Workshop for Health Professions Educators on Practicing Scholarly Citizenship
por: Way, David P., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

‘Scholarly peer reviewing’: The art, its joys and woes
por: Kurdi, Madhuri S
Publicado: (2015)

Academic practice in ecology and evolution: Soliciting a new category of manuscript
por: Moore, Allen J., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Credit and visibility for peer reviewing: An overlooked aspect of scholarly publication
por: Menon, Vikas, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

How To Publish: Preparing Manuscripts for Clarity, Transparency, Scholarly Integrity, and Success
por: Meeks, Suzanne
Publicado: (2020)

Preparing Your Manuscript: Strong and Ethical Scholarly Writing for Multidisciplinary Audiences
por: Meeks, Suzanne
Publicado: (2021)

PREPARING YOUR MANUSCRIPT: STRONG AND ETHICAL SCHOLARLY WRITING FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY AUDIENCES
por: Meeks, Suzanne
Publicado: (2022)

Essential Guide to Manuscript Writing for Academic Dummies: An Editor's Perspective
por: Aga, Syed Sameer, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Scholarly publishing threatened?
por: Andersson, Arne, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The future of scholarly communications
por: Kiley, Robert
Publicado: (2020)

Co-reviewing and ghostwriting by early-career researchers in the peer review of manuscripts
por: McDowell, Gary S, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Mentor, Scholar, Academic, and a Massage Therapist: an Interview with Amanda Baskwill, PhD(c), MSc, RMT
por: Kennedy, Ann Blair
Publicado: (2019)

"Predatory Journals" or "Predatory Scholars?" The Essential Role of the Peer Review Process
por: Chirico, Francesco
Publicado: (2017)

Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals
por: Squazzoni, Flaminio, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

An Overproduction of Scholars
Publicado: (1893)

An overview of innovations in the external peer review of journal manuscripts.
por: Woods, Helen Buckley, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Working 9 to 5, not the way to make an academic living: observational analysis of manuscript and peer review submissions over time
por: Barnett, Adrian, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Teaching peer reviewing to medical students through authentic peer reviews: how to build the next generation of scholars
por: Schmidt, Cindy, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Factors predictive of an academic otolaryngologist’s scholarly impact
por: Shires, Courtney B., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Academic research on the internet: options for scholars and libraries
por: Laurence, Helen, et al.
Publicado: (2000)

From Peer-Reviewed to Peer-Reproduced in Scholarly Publishing: The Complementary Roles of Data Models and Workflows in Bioinformatics
por: González-Beltrán, Alejandra, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_t6evcdilhl6vogc1ko4cee0m4g