Cargando…

Estimating the effectiveness of vaccine programs in dog populations

Dogs harbor numerous zoonotic pathogens, many of which are controlled through vaccination programs. The delivery of these programs can be difficult where resources are limited. We developed a dynamic model to estimate vaccination coverage and cost-per-dog vaccinated. The model considers the main fac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wallace, R.M., Undurraga, E.A., Gibson, A., Boone, J., Pieracci, E.G., Gamble, L., Blanton, J.D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6805755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31364582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268819001158
_version_ 1783461467178139648
author Wallace, R.M.
Undurraga, E.A.
Gibson, A.
Boone, J.
Pieracci, E.G.
Gamble, L.
Blanton, J.D.
author_facet Wallace, R.M.
Undurraga, E.A.
Gibson, A.
Boone, J.
Pieracci, E.G.
Gamble, L.
Blanton, J.D.
author_sort Wallace, R.M.
collection PubMed
description Dogs harbor numerous zoonotic pathogens, many of which are controlled through vaccination programs. The delivery of these programs can be difficult where resources are limited. We developed a dynamic model to estimate vaccination coverage and cost-per-dog vaccinated. The model considers the main factors that affect vaccination programs: dog demographics, effectiveness of strategies, efficacy of interventions and cost. The model was evaluated on data from 18 vaccination programs representing eight countries. Sensitivity analysis was performed for dog confinement and vaccination strategies. The average difference between modelled vaccination coverage and field data was 3.8% (2.3%–5.3%). Central point vaccination was the most cost-effective vaccination strategy when >88% of the dog population was confined. More active methods of vaccination, such as door-to-door or capture-vaccinate-release, achieved higher vaccination coverage in free-roaming dog populations but were more costly. This open-access tool can aid in planning more efficient vaccination campaigns in countries with limited resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6805755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68057552019-11-01 Estimating the effectiveness of vaccine programs in dog populations Wallace, R.M. Undurraga, E.A. Gibson, A. Boone, J. Pieracci, E.G. Gamble, L. Blanton, J.D. Epidemiol Infect Original Paper Dogs harbor numerous zoonotic pathogens, many of which are controlled through vaccination programs. The delivery of these programs can be difficult where resources are limited. We developed a dynamic model to estimate vaccination coverage and cost-per-dog vaccinated. The model considers the main factors that affect vaccination programs: dog demographics, effectiveness of strategies, efficacy of interventions and cost. The model was evaluated on data from 18 vaccination programs representing eight countries. Sensitivity analysis was performed for dog confinement and vaccination strategies. The average difference between modelled vaccination coverage and field data was 3.8% (2.3%–5.3%). Central point vaccination was the most cost-effective vaccination strategy when >88% of the dog population was confined. More active methods of vaccination, such as door-to-door or capture-vaccinate-release, achieved higher vaccination coverage in free-roaming dog populations but were more costly. This open-access tool can aid in planning more efficient vaccination campaigns in countries with limited resources. Cambridge University Press 2019-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6805755/ /pubmed/31364582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268819001158 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Wallace, R.M.
Undurraga, E.A.
Gibson, A.
Boone, J.
Pieracci, E.G.
Gamble, L.
Blanton, J.D.
Estimating the effectiveness of vaccine programs in dog populations
title Estimating the effectiveness of vaccine programs in dog populations
title_full Estimating the effectiveness of vaccine programs in dog populations
title_fullStr Estimating the effectiveness of vaccine programs in dog populations
title_full_unstemmed Estimating the effectiveness of vaccine programs in dog populations
title_short Estimating the effectiveness of vaccine programs in dog populations
title_sort estimating the effectiveness of vaccine programs in dog populations
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6805755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31364582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268819001158
work_keys_str_mv AT wallacerm estimatingtheeffectivenessofvaccineprogramsindogpopulations
AT undurragaea estimatingtheeffectivenessofvaccineprogramsindogpopulations
AT gibsona estimatingtheeffectivenessofvaccineprogramsindogpopulations
AT boonej estimatingtheeffectivenessofvaccineprogramsindogpopulations
AT pieraccieg estimatingtheeffectivenessofvaccineprogramsindogpopulations
AT gamblel estimatingtheeffectivenessofvaccineprogramsindogpopulations
AT blantonjd estimatingtheeffectivenessofvaccineprogramsindogpopulations