Cargando…
Estimating the effectiveness of vaccine programs in dog populations
Dogs harbor numerous zoonotic pathogens, many of which are controlled through vaccination programs. The delivery of these programs can be difficult where resources are limited. We developed a dynamic model to estimate vaccination coverage and cost-per-dog vaccinated. The model considers the main fac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6805755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31364582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268819001158 |
_version_ | 1783461467178139648 |
---|---|
author | Wallace, R.M. Undurraga, E.A. Gibson, A. Boone, J. Pieracci, E.G. Gamble, L. Blanton, J.D. |
author_facet | Wallace, R.M. Undurraga, E.A. Gibson, A. Boone, J. Pieracci, E.G. Gamble, L. Blanton, J.D. |
author_sort | Wallace, R.M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dogs harbor numerous zoonotic pathogens, many of which are controlled through vaccination programs. The delivery of these programs can be difficult where resources are limited. We developed a dynamic model to estimate vaccination coverage and cost-per-dog vaccinated. The model considers the main factors that affect vaccination programs: dog demographics, effectiveness of strategies, efficacy of interventions and cost. The model was evaluated on data from 18 vaccination programs representing eight countries. Sensitivity analysis was performed for dog confinement and vaccination strategies. The average difference between modelled vaccination coverage and field data was 3.8% (2.3%–5.3%). Central point vaccination was the most cost-effective vaccination strategy when >88% of the dog population was confined. More active methods of vaccination, such as door-to-door or capture-vaccinate-release, achieved higher vaccination coverage in free-roaming dog populations but were more costly. This open-access tool can aid in planning more efficient vaccination campaigns in countries with limited resources. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6805755 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68057552019-11-01 Estimating the effectiveness of vaccine programs in dog populations Wallace, R.M. Undurraga, E.A. Gibson, A. Boone, J. Pieracci, E.G. Gamble, L. Blanton, J.D. Epidemiol Infect Original Paper Dogs harbor numerous zoonotic pathogens, many of which are controlled through vaccination programs. The delivery of these programs can be difficult where resources are limited. We developed a dynamic model to estimate vaccination coverage and cost-per-dog vaccinated. The model considers the main factors that affect vaccination programs: dog demographics, effectiveness of strategies, efficacy of interventions and cost. The model was evaluated on data from 18 vaccination programs representing eight countries. Sensitivity analysis was performed for dog confinement and vaccination strategies. The average difference between modelled vaccination coverage and field data was 3.8% (2.3%–5.3%). Central point vaccination was the most cost-effective vaccination strategy when >88% of the dog population was confined. More active methods of vaccination, such as door-to-door or capture-vaccinate-release, achieved higher vaccination coverage in free-roaming dog populations but were more costly. This open-access tool can aid in planning more efficient vaccination campaigns in countries with limited resources. Cambridge University Press 2019-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6805755/ /pubmed/31364582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268819001158 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Wallace, R.M. Undurraga, E.A. Gibson, A. Boone, J. Pieracci, E.G. Gamble, L. Blanton, J.D. Estimating the effectiveness of vaccine programs in dog populations |
title | Estimating the effectiveness of vaccine programs in dog populations |
title_full | Estimating the effectiveness of vaccine programs in dog populations |
title_fullStr | Estimating the effectiveness of vaccine programs in dog populations |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimating the effectiveness of vaccine programs in dog populations |
title_short | Estimating the effectiveness of vaccine programs in dog populations |
title_sort | estimating the effectiveness of vaccine programs in dog populations |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6805755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31364582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268819001158 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wallacerm estimatingtheeffectivenessofvaccineprogramsindogpopulations AT undurragaea estimatingtheeffectivenessofvaccineprogramsindogpopulations AT gibsona estimatingtheeffectivenessofvaccineprogramsindogpopulations AT boonej estimatingtheeffectivenessofvaccineprogramsindogpopulations AT pieraccieg estimatingtheeffectivenessofvaccineprogramsindogpopulations AT gamblel estimatingtheeffectivenessofvaccineprogramsindogpopulations AT blantonjd estimatingtheeffectivenessofvaccineprogramsindogpopulations |