Cargando…
Neuroscientific evidence in the courtroom: a review
The use of neuroscience in the courtroom can be traced back to the early twentieth century. However, the use of neuroscientific evidence in criminal proceedings has increased significantly over the last two decades. This rapid increase has raised questions, among the media as well as the legal and s...
Autores principales: | Aono, Darby, Yaffe, Gideon, Kober, Hedy |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6805839/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31641963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0179-y |
Ejemplares similares
-
The use of neuroscientific evidence in the courtroom by those accused of criminal offenses in England and Wales
por: Catley, Paul, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
A scientist’s take on scientific evidence in the courtroom
por: Albright, Thomas D.
Publicado: (2023) -
Statistical science in the courtroom
por: Gastwirth, Joseph
Publicado: (2000) -
Diffusion tensor imaging in the courtroom: Distinction between scientific specificity and legally admissible evidence
por: van Velkinburgh, Jennifer Christine, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Cryonics in the Courtroom: Which Interests? Whose Interests?
por: Huxtable, Richard
Publicado: (2018)